Two thirds of coronavirus victims would have died anyway
Two thirds of coronavirus victims would have died anyway
Author
Discussion

bobmedley

Original Poster:

85 posts

99 months

robbieduncan

1,993 posts

260 months

Wednesday 25th March 2020
quotequote all
Surely 100% would have died over a long enough time scale?

greygoose

9,422 posts

219 months

Wednesday 25th March 2020
quotequote all
I would expect 100%, maybe over several decades though.

oyster

13,508 posts

272 months

Wednesday 25th March 2020
quotequote all
Is the other third made up of contenders for The Gathering?

bobmedley

Original Poster:

85 posts

99 months

Wednesday 25th March 2020
quotequote all
True laugh

But he does say this year, which I couldn't fit into the title.......

Edited by bobmedley on Wednesday 25th March 17:04

Wonderman

2,952 posts

219 months

Wednesday 25th March 2020
quotequote all
bobmedley said:
But probably not in ICU/ ventilator in high numbers simultaneously, thus using capacity that could be used to save other lives...when they say protecting the NHS (other than giving it to staff, was it 14% of cases in Spain is health workers?) it means not having to stratify access to this capacity i.e.to prioritize those likely to survive.

JagLover

46,220 posts

259 months

Wednesday 25th March 2020
quotequote all
bobmedley said:
Anyone else getting a distinct feeling of back tracking?

Wasn't he the chap who predicted 500K deaths from swine Flu?

Sophisticated Sarah

15,078 posts

193 months

Wednesday 25th March 2020
quotequote all
JagLover said:
bobmedley said:
Anyone else getting a distinct feeling of back tracking?

Wasn't he the chap who predicted 500K deaths from swine Flu?
He was probably fishing for research funding