Fair FX and Revolut
Discussion
Was advised to get money out of both as they are not covered by FSCS.
Surely companies who's only business is money would or should be covered by the FSCS ?
I imagine these current conditions may be hard enough on them to cause concern.?
Edit to add, I don't use either but found it odd that they would not be covered as I've said.
Surely companies who's only business is money would or should be covered by the FSCS ?
I imagine these current conditions may be hard enough on them to cause concern.?
Edit to add, I don't use either but found it odd that they would not be covered as I've said.
Edited by Brads67 on Thursday 9th April 22:11
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Not sure if it matters in this case. I think the question is reversed. Why would you want to keep money in Revolut? It doesn’t appear to do anything some of the other fintechs do other than not have a U.K. banking licence. So unless that is particularly important to you or you are extremely loyal to Lithuania...
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Ok granted it probably sounded a bit dramatic, but it was a Bank Director, I posted because I thought all companies like this would be obliged to be in the compensation scheme.
This guy obviously does not think well of the two companies mentioned and advocated having bugger all to do with them

As I have said, I don't use them.
Gassing Station | Finance | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


