Hatie Kopkins

[nadger]

Is she
A) a spite filled, knuckle dragging, racist xenophobe
B) a grifting chancer, willing to say anything for the spotlight
C) a conduit for the alternate views of many, not represented in the media/politics at the moment
What do we think?

[Gecko1978]

I used to think B but more of her stuff I watched and read felt like A.

[Drezza]

I think she thrives out of shocking a reaction out of people to gain popularity. A bit like an internet troll. I have found myself agreeing with some of the stuff she says before but overall i don't pay her much attention and she doesn't particularly offend me like most people. People get too offended these days.

[cherryowen]

Who fking cares

[mx5nut]

nadger said:

Is she
A) a spite filled, knuckle dragging, racist xenophobe
B) a grifting chancer, willing to say anything for the spotlight

Yes

[anonymous-user]

She’s a st for brains waster without a useful cell in her.

Her good luck is half the country is more stupid.

[andyeds1234]

She’s the same all the other pondlife who discovered that there’s money to be made in a post truth world. Lie, offend, abuse, conspire, and repeat. Views = dollars, and nothing else matters.

[Leins]

D) An irrelevance, as important to me as the back catalogue of the Bedingfield siblings or recipes for tapioca pudding. Actually, probably less so

[Monkeylegend]

Bit like groundhog day again, same old st just a different day, not worth the bandwith discussing all this again is it?

[10126 Torino]

E)....Loser on the Apprentice.....

[dmahon]

A mixture of the 3. I follow her on Twitter and though she can be a bit of a knob, a few things she calls out are on the money, especially on the virus situation.

Even with aholes like Piers Morgan, saying things as they are in a hyper PC world can be a redeeming feature.

[milkround]

People who stand out and get attention on here:

1. Those who have some amazing talent, like the intelligence of skill and knowledge in a particular topic.

2. Those who have obscene money and fancy cars etc.

3. Those who chat drivel and basically say things to get a reaction.

The mainstream media is just like this website. She knows what she is doing and is cashing in on her persona.

[Matty3]

milkround said:

People who stand out and get attention on here:

1. Those who have some amazing talent, like the intelligence of skill and knowledge in a particular topic.

2. Those who have obscene money and fancy cars etc.

3. Those who chat drivel and basically say things to get a reaction.

The mainstream media is just like this website. She knows what she is doing and is cashing in on her persona.

You have my attention - which is your category?

[0ddball]

If you can't be famous, be infamous. She says what she needs to say to get a reaction from the slow witted. Clarkson has been doing the same for the past 30 years and most of you lapped that up.

[colin_p]

A true national treasure.

[anonymous-user]

0ddball said:

If you can't be famous, be infamous. She says what she needs to say to get a reaction from the slow witted. Clarkson has been doing the same for the past 30 years and most of you lapped that up.

If Hopkins and Clarkson bred, would the offspring basically be Emporer Palpatine?

Edited by janesmith1950 on Sunday 17th May 00:23

[scrubchub]

Mining Subsidence Man said:

May I just say, I'd hit it like a ginger stepchild.

"Hit it like a ginger step-child"? What the fk does that even mean? I mean, I get the sentiment, but what a pathetic turn of phrase....

[Amirhussain]

0ddball said:

If you can't be famous, be infamous. She says what she needs to say to get a reaction from the slow witted. Clarkson has been doing the same for the past 30 years and most of you lapped that up.

Harsh on Clarkson. Whilst we have seen him make an idiot of himself on the telly and contradict himself at times, no way you can compare him to that hateful bh. Outside of the motoring stuff, he as made some top top shows.

[milkround]

Matty3 said:

milkround said:

People who stand out and get attention on here:

1. Those who have some amazing talent, like the intelligence of skill and knowledge in a particular topic.

2. Those who have obscene money and fancy cars etc.

3. Those who chat drivel and basically say things to get a reaction.

The mainstream media is just like this website. She knows what she is doing and is cashing in on her persona.

You have my attention - which is your category?

Err isn't it obvisous from my posting in Biker Banter? I own a Honda PCX.

[Scrump]

There is already a Katie Hopkins appreciation thread here:
https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...