Solution for speedo error on 996 turbos.
Solution for speedo error on 996 turbos.
Author
Discussion

adamt

Original Poster:

2,825 posts

279 months

Sunday 19th June 2005
quotequote all
This has been my only annoyance with our car. When we go to Vmax the speedo always over-reads hugely, perhaps by 15mph sometimes.

Anywho i have been driving in Europe for the last couple of days and have had the digital speedo in kmh. Whilst driving through france at a fairly decent clip i noticed that the analogue speedo(which is still in mph) was showing a much higher speed than the kmh digital reading.

So last night i conducted a little test. Speed up to 186mph on the digital speedo and then switch to kmh(easily done i had set everything up beforehand) and the kmh display came up, reading 279kmh.(172mph)

What do you guys think? Have Porsche FUBAR'd with their mph equations or something?

all the best
adam

flemke

23,437 posts

264 months

Sunday 19th June 2005
quotequote all
Adam,

Does your car have factory-spec tyres on it? Don't Ruf use a very low aspect-ratio tyre? That would increase the rate of over-reading.

On the GT3-II, indicated 203 is actual 190.
On the CGT, indicated 217 is actual 206.
Both were on standard Pilot Sports that were about 1/3 worn.

adamt

Original Poster:

2,825 posts

279 months

Sunday 19th June 2005
quotequote all
We have crappy Yokohama AVS Sports, which are 315/25 19 at the rear.

What was the CGT like at 206mph? Was it bouncing off the limiter?

adam

GuyR

2,536 posts

309 months

Monday 20th June 2005
quotequote all
The error varies from car to car.

My car at the last VMax was indicated at 200/201mph through the timing beam and was doing an actual 196mph, so it's very close. Tyres are stock sizes, but Pirelli Corsas.

I would have thought that the ecu could be adjusted using the Porsche diagnostic/programming tool.

The error between km and mph seems odd though.

Guy

adamt

Original Poster:

2,825 posts

279 months

Monday 20th June 2005
quotequote all
I agree, it is really puzzling,

But i am really sure that the kmh ready is pretty accurate, probably only a few kmh off at 330 or so. I guess we will just have to wait for vmax!


adam

p.s YHM

flemke

23,437 posts

264 months

Monday 20th June 2005
quotequote all
GuyR said:
The error varies from car to car.

My car at the last VMax was indicated at 200/201mph through the timing beam and was doing an actual 196mph, so it's very close. Tyres are stock sizes, but Pirelli Corsas.
Guy,
I think you'll find that, for a given set of nominal dimensions, from one maker to another there is considerable variation in the actual dimensions - both rolling diameter and width.

GuyR

2,536 posts

309 months

Monday 20th June 2005
quotequote all
flemke said:

Guy,
I think you'll find that, for a given set of nominal dimensions, from one maker to another there is considerable variation in the actual dimensions - both rolling diameter and width.



Agreed. I recall checking the rolling circumference for the Corsas though and they were very similar to the Michelin Pilots that were fitted, if not identical. I did VMax with both sets of tires and wasn't getting any noticeable difference in speedo readings, well at least not of the order of Adams, whose car has shown 15-20mph over-speed.

>> Edited by GuyR on Monday 20th June 13:58

flemke

23,437 posts

264 months

Monday 20th June 2005
quotequote all
adamt said:
We have crappy Yokohama AVS Sports, which are 315/25 19 at the rear.

What was the CGT like at 206mph? Was it bouncing off the limiter?

adam
Adam,
If you run the numbers I think you'll find that, in theory, the Yokohamas have about 2% greater diameter than what I think is standard on the 996TT (285/30/18?).

The CGT was pretty much at its true max speed. As I said in the article, there may have been another 1 mph in it, but I had to back off for traffic, which had started to build (plus I had to allow time for Roger Green to do some runs). Maybe the true max for the car is 207, but maybe not. Then you get into following or head winds, uphill or down, etc. Who knows?
The rev limit seems to be at about 8200. I'd say that in sixth we were at around 8000-8100. I was not focusing on the tach at the time.

Cheers.

adamt

Original Poster:

2,825 posts

279 months

Monday 20th June 2005
quotequote all
Excellent stuff, i sadly missed the EVO issue, and havent read the article, but thank you for your account it is really appreciated.

I love chasing the Vmax of these cars, because it is so exciting, and also there is always that nagging feeling that it could have gone a bit faster!

all the best
adam

dazren

22,612 posts

288 months

Monday 20th June 2005
quotequote all
adamt said:
Excellent stuff, i sadly missed the EVO issue, and havent read the article, but thank you for your account it is really appreciated.

Think I've still got it. I'll bring it to VMAX.

DAZ

GuyR

2,536 posts

309 months

Monday 20th June 2005
quotequote all

Stock Turbo is 295/30/18 which on PS2 is 832 revs/mile, whereas 315/25/19 is 824 revs/mile (source Tirerack.com). This is a 1% error, so would only account for 2pm at 200mph, not the 15-20mph difference that Adam is seeing.

The speed sensor is presumably from the ABS. The question is whether the front or rear wheels are used, or an average. This would dictate which tire diameter changes (front or rear or both) affect the speedo reading.

PS The Evo article was great. I have every issue of Evo published, it's the only mag I keep of the dozens I buy each month.



>> Edited by GuyR on Monday 20th June 15:11

adamt

Original Poster:

2,825 posts

279 months

Monday 20th June 2005
quotequote all
Thanks Daz much appreciated.

I am still puzzled by the fact that the car sees 186mph but when you switch to kmh it is showing 279kmh...really strange,

all the best
adam

Java John

5 posts

253 months

Monday 20th June 2005
quotequote all
Just a thought...are you sure it read 279kmh and not 297kmh? 297kmh is 186mph.

>> Edited by Java John on Monday 20th June 19:24

adamt

Original Poster:

2,825 posts

279 months

Tuesday 21st June 2005
quotequote all
John that is an excellent point, but i am very sure it read 279kmh.

But still good point

all the best
adam

Rods

1,798 posts

280 months

Tuesday 21st June 2005
quotequote all
adamt said:
John that is an excellent point, but i am very sure it read 279kmh.

But still good point

all the best
adam


Best go out and try again then Adam,just to be sure...

Marki

15,763 posts

297 months

Tuesday 21st June 2005
quotequote all
Rods said:

adamt said:
John that is an excellent point, but i am very sure it read 279kmh.

But still good point

all the best
adam



Best go out and try again then Adam,just to be sure...



adamt

Original Poster:

2,825 posts

279 months

Tuesday 21st June 2005
quotequote all
Rods said:

adamt said:
John that is an excellent point, but i am very sure it read 279kmh.

But still good point

all the best
adam



Best go out and try again then Adam,just to be sure...


I was seriously considering that....Bounce: