Non- motorway routes for EVs
Author
Discussion

tali1

Original Poster:

5,284 posts

223 months

Tuesday 25th August 2020
quotequote all
Sat-navs give Non- motorway route options , so do EVs perform more efficiently on A and B roads and get longer range ? (even with longer non-mway journey )

robbieduncan

1,993 posts

258 months

Tuesday 25th August 2020
quotequote all
I suspect that travelling at a constant speed on the motorway will be more efficient that speeding up and slowing down on A or B roads. If your are worried about efficiency use cruise and travel a bit slower on the motorway. 60 will be massively more efficient than 70 or 80

jjwilde

1,904 posts

118 months

Tuesday 25th August 2020
quotequote all
I mean... kinda. The slower you drive the further it will go, that's why the 'record' for distance from, say, a Tesla is something like 670 miles to a charge.

But with modern EVs (Tesla, Niro, Kona, Zoe etc) you should get 200-300miles on the motorway no worries.

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

276 months

Tuesday 25th August 2020
quotequote all
Constant speed is better, lower speed is more efficient to a point (depends on heating etc).

Speeding up and slowing down using regen has an energy cost (you get back roughly 70% round trip), so in traffic you'll probably do worse overall than keeping a constant speed on motorway (say 30-50mph vs 70mph). if the A/B roads are clear they could well be better bu you can always go slower on motorways... (I know, I wouldn't either).

anonymous-user

76 months

Tuesday 25th August 2020
quotequote all
autopilot on b roads is pretty efficient. requires discipline otherwise

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

276 months

Tuesday 25th August 2020
quotequote all
sambucket said:
autopilot on b roads is pretty efficient. requires discipline otherwise
I've tried to match AP's efficiency and consistency and I cant get close.

cailean

917 posts

195 months

Tuesday 25th August 2020
quotequote all
You don't have to drive at or over the speed limit, it's not a target...

craigjm

20,308 posts

222 months

Tuesday 25th August 2020
quotequote all
robbieduncan said:
60 will be massively more efficient than 70 or 80
Do those rules still apply in the same way as ICE cars?

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

276 months

Tuesday 25th August 2020
quotequote all
craigjm said:
Do those rules still apply in the same way as ICE cars?
More so, theres far less cost to going slower in an EV

leef44

5,143 posts

175 months

Tuesday 25th August 2020
quotequote all
cailean said:
You don't have to drive at or over the speed limit, it's not a target...
But then you get angry people behind you, shouting "don't you know how to drive, get off the road?" silly

romeogolf

2,112 posts

141 months

Wednesday 26th August 2020
quotequote all
tali1 said:
Sat-navs give Non- motorway route options , so do EVs perform more efficiently on A and B roads and get longer range ? (even with longer non-mway journey )
By the time you've got a few extra miles out of the battery, surely you'll have driven those extra miles taking a less direct route on back roads?

Yes, slower speeds are more efficient, but as others have said, there are also losses with changes of speed. Sitting at 60ish on the motorway will probably do you better than trying to find another route.

anonymous-user

76 months

Wednesday 26th August 2020
quotequote all
craigjm said:
robbieduncan said:
60 will be massively more efficient than 70 or 80
Do those rules still apply in the same way as ICE cars?
a small pedantic but important point, please don't confuse "efficiency" with "consumption"!!

To a large degree, EVs are not actually about "efficiency" because they always efficient . A typical PMAC electric motor has a peak efficiency of around 98% and a minimum efficiency of 96% as compared to an ICE that only reaches a peak efficiency of around 25%, but has a min efficiency of 0% (idling).

For an EV, what we need to talk about in cinsumption, ie how much power is it taking to move the car, rather than the efficiency with which it is converting chemical energy in the battery to kinetic energy.

Broadly, the energy required to move a car against atmospheric drag goes up with the square of speed, and so around 40 to 50 mph, this starts to dominate other losses, such as tyre drag, rolling friction (bearings etc).





SCEtoAUX

4,119 posts

103 months

Friday 28th August 2020
quotequote all
As someone who has covered over 50k miles in a Nissan Leaf, my tip here is to not use cruise control.

From my experience it does not use the throttle as cleverly as a human.

leef44

5,143 posts

175 months

Friday 28th August 2020
quotequote all
SCEtoAUX said:
As someone who has covered over 50k miles in a Nissan Leaf, my tip here is to not use cruise control.

From my experience it does not use the throttle as cleverly as a human.
this depends on the driver, I'm with you on this one - it's the same with ICE.

If you are looking far enough ahead then you can anticipate when to let off the throttle whereas cruise control may continue until it gets closer to upcoming traffic, brake and then accelerate up again as it frees up.