john boyega . Disney was racist
Discussion
I don’t know why people keep doing this.
Surely he should be thankful. Now noone will touch him.
Nick cannon had an outburst a while ago - believe what you want to believe and think what you want but if you have a career in the public eye make sure you think before you let your views out in public.
Edited because I got outed as a posh pervert.
I am not posh.
Surely he should be thankful. Now noone will touch him.
Nick cannon had an outburst a while ago - believe what you want to believe and think what you want but if you have a career in the public eye make sure you think before you let your views out in public.
Edited because I got outed as a posh pervert.
I am not posh.
Edited by pidsy on Thursday 3rd September 22:43
Tycho said:
It wasn't Disney being racist. It was Disney having an incompetent strategy for the writing of the story and they didn't know what to do with any of the characters so they focused on the main 2.
And I dare say there has been a lot more people upset by that particular crime! 
Ian974 said:
Tycho said:
It wasn't Disney being racist. It was Disney having an incompetent strategy for the writing of the story and they didn't know what to do with any of the characters so they focused on the main 2.
And I dare say there has been a lot more people upset by that particular crime! 
t. All of the characters were pretty forgettable.I can see where he's coming from, but he seems to be overlooking the not insignificant point that the second of the Star Wars sequels was such a nuclear wet-s
t bomb of a movie that it took considerable skill to bring it to any ending at all.
His character should really have died in the second movie, which would have given him a meaningful if cliched story arc. Instead they saved him for the most utterly pointles and s
t of reasons that... aaaagh, that movie was so bad!
Actors are wasted in movies more often than not, I imagine.
t bomb of a movie that it took considerable skill to bring it to any ending at all.His character should really have died in the second movie, which would have given him a meaningful if cliched story arc. Instead they saved him for the most utterly pointles and s
t of reasons that... aaaagh, that movie was so bad!Actors are wasted in movies more often than not, I imagine.
Edited by glazbagun on Friday 4th September 00:14
Tycho said:
It wasn't Disney being racist. It was Disney having an incompetent strategy for the writing of the story and they didn't know what to do with any of the characters so they focused on the main 2.

The character was set up well in the first movie and then given a silly side quest for something to do in the second.
Don't mistake poor writing for racism would have been my suggestion to him.
TheDrBrian said:
Tycho said:
It wasn't Disney being racist. It was Disney having an incompetent strategy for the writing of the story and they didn't know what to do with any of the characters so they focused on the main 2.
That and they wanted to appeal to China.BadBull said:
Dragged from obscurity. Now believes his own hype. Thinks he's an A-lister. Thinks people want to hear what he has to say. Plays the race card because a films focus was (shock horror) on the main characters.
.
In the first movie he was one of the main characters and he would reasonably have had every expectation that would continue. .
The problem was that the second movie was written and directed by someone who had little interest in telling a coherent story, or developing the themes from the first movie, but just wanted to trample on the brand and promote an extreme feminist agenda. His character became a casualty in that process, though less so than Luke.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



