M4 to C43 AMG - Anyone had both?
Discussion
I have an itch to scratch with an AMG and due to company car rules I can't get a 63 as I need to keep it to 3.0 or below engine size.
I had an M4 last year and it was amazing (wish I hadn't sold it). I considered a C43 AMG at the time (both coupes) but went with the M4 as I didn't like the crabbing the C43 suffered with.
Now I have owned the M4 I don't know what else can bring me the same buzz for 35-40k 3.0 engine and 4 seats so I am looking at the C43 again, the 2nd generation car?
I know the M4 will be a bit more lively and the C43 a bit more reserved. I will drive them both back to back but had a string of BMW's but wanted something different but not if I will be disappointed.
Has anyone had both?
I had an M4 last year and it was amazing (wish I hadn't sold it). I considered a C43 AMG at the time (both coupes) but went with the M4 as I didn't like the crabbing the C43 suffered with.
Now I have owned the M4 I don't know what else can bring me the same buzz for 35-40k 3.0 engine and 4 seats so I am looking at the C43 again, the 2nd generation car?
I know the M4 will be a bit more lively and the C43 a bit more reserved. I will drive them both back to back but had a string of BMW's but wanted something different but not if I will be disappointed.
Has anyone had both?
Edited by interstellar on Wednesday 9th September 12:08
I'd say go & try a Giulia Quadrifoglio they're really something special more so imo than the M4 having supplied a few C43's they're not full fat AMGs (I think Mercedes should have kept the 400 badgefor these) it's a M340i/S4/5 competitor, as long as you're happy with that the yes it's a good pick.
As I said if it has to be 3.0 or below then I'd personally be buying the Giulia:
https://www.autotrader.co.uk/car-details/202008192...
https://www.autotrader.co.uk/car-details/202009093...
https://www.autotrader.co.uk/car-details/202007211...
https://www.autotrader.co.uk/car-details/202008242...
As I said if it has to be 3.0 or below then I'd personally be buying the Giulia:
https://www.autotrader.co.uk/car-details/202008192...
https://www.autotrader.co.uk/car-details/202009093...
https://www.autotrader.co.uk/car-details/202007211...
https://www.autotrader.co.uk/car-details/202008242...
C63 owners would say it isn’t and it’s often called a baby amg. The badge is official and it’s an Amg on the website although it’s performance is S4, m340i comparable really.
I don’t think the m4 can be beaten really for under 40k
I don’t think the m4 can be beaten really for under 40k
Edited by interstellar on Thursday 10th September 07:56
I chose a 440i over a C43 (amongst other things) - so obviously there’s no way I’d choose one over an M4. As has already been said, it’s not a full fat AMG.
The Giulia Quad is a bombastic thing to drive and is like a 4 door supercar but the overall quality is seriously lacking. I ended up buying a Giulia Veloce and it wasn’t a very happy experience (but again, a great thing to drive) and the BMW & Mercedes is a league or two above when it comes to the cabin and a place to spend time.
My Veloce did have folding rear seats however and I managed to get 2 650B mountain bikes and weekend gear into it with a bit of organising. I couldn’t do that with a 4 coupe.
The Giulia Quad is a bombastic thing to drive and is like a 4 door supercar but the overall quality is seriously lacking. I ended up buying a Giulia Veloce and it wasn’t a very happy experience (but again, a great thing to drive) and the BMW & Mercedes is a league or two above when it comes to the cabin and a place to spend time.
My Veloce did have folding rear seats however and I managed to get 2 650B mountain bikes and weekend gear into it with a bit of organising. I couldn’t do that with a 4 coupe.
MarkJS said:
I chose a 440i over a C43 (amongst other things) - so obviously there’s no way I’d choose one over an M4. As has already been said, it’s not a full fat AMG.
The Giulia Quad is a bombastic thing to drive and is like a 4 door supercar but the overall quality is seriously lacking. I ended up buying a Giulia Veloce and it wasn’t a very happy experience (but again, a great thing to drive) and the BMW & Mercedes is a league or two above when it comes to the cabin and a place to spend time.
My Veloce did have folding rear seats however and I managed to get 2 650B mountain bikes and weekend gear into it with a bit of organising. I couldn’t do that with a 4 coupe.
Thanks, good to know on all fronts. The cabin in the c43 seems quite special so I will try it and see. I have had so many BMW’s I need to try something else and the Giulia although a weapon doesn’t seem the right car for work and 15-20k a year but I will definitely have a test drive and see whether the grin factor changes that. The Giulia Quad is a bombastic thing to drive and is like a 4 door supercar but the overall quality is seriously lacking. I ended up buying a Giulia Veloce and it wasn’t a very happy experience (but again, a great thing to drive) and the BMW & Mercedes is a league or two above when it comes to the cabin and a place to spend time.
My Veloce did have folding rear seats however and I managed to get 2 650B mountain bikes and weekend gear into it with a bit of organising. I couldn’t do that with a 4 coupe.
This is all theory of course so I need to drive all 3 and see what is best
I had a C43 and I found it to be quite a quick, competent and comfortable car. The only real downside to the C43 was (my perception of) the weight of the thing, it just felt a little too heavy for me and I ended up getting something lighter. The crabbing thing didn't bother me at all. I should add that the C43 wasn't my daily.
Unknown_User said:
I had a C43 and I found it to be quite a quick, competent and comfortable car. The only real downside to the C43 was (my perception of) the weight of the thing, it just felt a little too heavy for me and I ended up getting something lighter. The crabbing thing didn't bother me at all. I should add that the C43 wasn't my daily.
I’d totally agree with this - the Mercedes is a lovely car but just didn’t feel as nimble as the 440i and didn’t make quite as nice a noise. The crabbing that has been mentioned - if you mean the car feeling/sounding like it’s dragging the inside front wheel on mid/full lock at low speeds, the then Alfa Giulia also does this. It feels and sounds horrible.
MarkJS said:
Unknown_User said:
I had a C43 and I found it to be quite a quick, competent and comfortable car. The only real downside to the C43 was (my perception of) the weight of the thing, it just felt a little too heavy for me and I ended up getting something lighter. The crabbing thing didn't bother me at all. I should add that the C43 wasn't my daily.
I’d totally agree with this - the Mercedes is a lovely car but just didn’t feel as nimble as the 440i and didn’t make quite as nice a noise. The crabbing that has been mentioned - if you mean the car feeling/sounding like it’s dragging the inside front wheel on mid/full lock at low speeds, the then Alfa Giulia also does this. It feels and sounds horrible.
The m4 might need to return to the fold.
interstellar said:
MarkJS said:
Unknown_User said:
I had a C43 and I found it to be quite a quick, competent and comfortable car. The only real downside to the C43 was (my perception of) the weight of the thing, it just felt a little too heavy for me and I ended up getting something lighter. The crabbing thing didn't bother me at all. I should add that the C43 wasn't my daily.
I’d totally agree with this - the Mercedes is a lovely car but just didn’t feel as nimble as the 440i and didn’t make quite as nice a noise. The crabbing that has been mentioned - if you mean the car feeling/sounding like it’s dragging the inside front wheel on mid/full lock at low speeds, the then Alfa Giulia also does this. It feels and sounds horrible.
The m4 might need to return to the fold.
Gassing Station | Car Buying | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff





