Discussion
R Mutt said:
Would be a valid point if it was the case
Of course the original lockdown did disproportionately affect those not co-habiting.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/couples-established-relationship-now-officially-22728545Of course the original lockdown did disproportionately affect those not co-habiting.
But in a blow to would-be lotharios, casual sex is still banned in government guidance - although it's probably for the best given the rising number of cases.
This looks horrible and I wonder if it’s enforceable in this country?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-54261911
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-54261911
A500leroy said:
R Mutt said:
Would be a valid point if it was the case
Of course the original lockdown did disproportionately affect those not co-habiting.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/couples-established-relationship-now-officially-22728545Of course the original lockdown did disproportionately affect those not co-habiting.
But in a blow to would-be lotharios, casual sex is still banned in government guidance - although it's probably for the best given the rising number of cases.
Of course we've been advised to stay 2m from people we don't live with, but what is the law surrounding that, and how has that changed since March?
The BBC's article is a bit clearer than the one from the Mirror, though it isn't clear if 'banned' actually means illegal or just not allowed under 'guidelines'. I thought guidelines were simply guidance/recommendation.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/newsbeat-53736087
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/newsbeat-53736087
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff






k me, that's w