Fairey Rotodyne
Author
Discussion

Lotobear

Original Poster:

8,675 posts

152 months

Wednesday 30th September 2020
quotequote all

Stumbled by accident across one of these on You Tube last night and realised I had never heard of it - what a fascinating machine. It never ceases to amaze me how the UK was so far ahead in aviation druing that era, even the US wanted to buy them.

It strikes me as an idea which could still work now - why was it never re kindled?

RizzoTheRat

28,154 posts

216 months

Wednesday 30th September 2020
quotequote all
Compound helicopters do seem to have died a death after being a popular idea in the 50's and 60's, one of the competitors for the attack helicopter competition that led to the Apache was the Cheyenne, a compound design with a pusher prop.

S. Gonzales Esq.

2,559 posts

236 months

Wednesday 30th September 2020
quotequote all
Killed by tip-jet noise IIRC.

One thread here, other PH mentions if you search.

aeropilot

39,766 posts

251 months

Wednesday 30th September 2020
quotequote all
Lotobear said:
Stumbled by accident across one of these on You Tube last night and realised I had never heard of it - what a fascinating machine. It never ceases to amaze me how the UK was so far ahead in aviation druing that era, even the US wanted to buy them.

It strikes me as an idea which could still work now - why was it never re kindled?
Noise.

The Rotodyne is generally considered to have been one of the noisiest aircraft to have ever flown.

Eric Mc

124,897 posts

289 months

Wednesday 30th September 2020
quotequote all
I reckon that the noise issue could have been solved with some thought and investment.

It was chiefly killed by the fact that it was a Fairey design which was transferred to Westland when the government forced industry mergers in the late 1950s/early 1960s.

All the helicopter projects of Fairey, Sunders Roe and Bristol were transferred to Westland in 1960 or so. Westland's main plan was to acquire licensing or conduct collaborative projects with foreign companies rather than continue with projects started by companies that had once been their UK rivals.

For the same reason, they didn't want to proceed with developments of the Belvedere.

As far as I can remember, the only home grown project that Westland continued with was the Scout/Wasp - which they had acquired from Sunders Roe.

All other Westland helicopters were based on licensed copies of Sikorsky or Bell designs. Later they collaborated with Sud Aviation/Aerosptiale in France and Agusta in Italy.

Chucklehead

2,848 posts

232 months

Wednesday 30th September 2020
quotequote all
aeropilot said:
Lotobear said:
Stumbled by accident across one of these on You Tube last night and realised I had never heard of it - what a fascinating machine. It never ceases to amaze me how the UK was so far ahead in aviation druing that era, even the US wanted to buy them.

It strikes me as an idea which could still work now - why was it never re kindled?
Noise.

The Rotodyne is generally considered to have been one of the noisiest aircraft to have ever flown.
An AN-12 flew 25k feet over my house last week and I could've sworn that it was hovering at 2000 feet for 8 minutes. Is it worse than that??

aeropilot

39,766 posts

251 months

Wednesday 30th September 2020
quotequote all
Chucklehead said:
aeropilot said:
Lotobear said:
Stumbled by accident across one of these on You Tube last night and realised I had never heard of it - what a fascinating machine. It never ceases to amaze me how the UK was so far ahead in aviation druing that era, even the US wanted to buy them.

It strikes me as an idea which could still work now - why was it never re kindled?
Noise.

The Rotodyne is generally considered to have been one of the noisiest aircraft to have ever flown.
An AN-12 flew 25k feet over my house last week and I could've sworn that it was hovering at 2000 feet for 8 minutes. Is it worse than that??
By all accounts, yes.

Eric Mc

124,897 posts

289 months

Wednesday 30th September 2020
quotequote all
The only evidence we have for the noise it produced is what you can hear on contemporary newsreel footage - and that won't be realistic as the sound may even have been overdubbed during editing.

I don't think the noise can have been that great. The jets mounted on the rotor tips were quite small - only about the size of a wine bottle. A number of other helicopters had been built using the same principle, Fairey's own Gyrodyne for example and the Fairey Ultra Light - and nobody said a huge amount about the noise they made.





Airfix and Revell both produced kits of the Rotodyne -





I am convinced that the real reason why the Rotodyne was discontinued was because it didn't fit into Westland's plans for their future.






LotusOmega375D

9,077 posts

177 months

Wednesday 30th September 2020
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
The only evidence we have for the noise it produced is what you can hear on contemporary newsreel footage - and that won't be realistic as the sound may even have been overdubbed during editing.

I don't think the noise can have been that great. The jets mounted on the rotor tips were quite small - only about the size of a wine bottle. A number of other helicopters had been built using the same principle, Fairey's own Gyrodyne for example and the Fairey Ultra Light - and nobody said a huge amount about the noise they made.

There’s a blue one of those at the Coventry airport museum. I saw it last month and it’s tiny. I couldn’t even make my mind up whether it was a real aircraft or just a model.

silverfoxcc

8,121 posts

169 months

Wednesday 30th September 2020
quotequote all
I had the Airfix kit!!

Tony1963

5,808 posts

186 months

Wednesday 30th September 2020
quotequote all
As well as the noise problem, there wasn’t really a need for it. The dream was that people would travel from city centres in these fairly large beasts. Even without the blade tip jet noise, they would’ve been pretty antisocial.

This beast was much, much noisier:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_XF-84H_Th...


Leon R

3,695 posts

120 months

Wednesday 30th September 2020
quotequote all
Tony1963 said:
As well as the noise problem, there wasn’t really a need for it. The dream was that people would travel from city centres in these fairly large beasts. Even without the blade tip jet noise, they would’ve been pretty antisocial.

This beast was much, much noisier:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_XF-84H_Th...
I've see that one in person at Dayton.

Easily one of my favourite museums ever and the only place to see an XB-70.

Eric Mc

124,897 posts

289 months

Wednesday 30th September 2020
quotequote all
Tony1963 said:
As well as the noise problem, there wasn’t really a need for it. The dream was that people would travel from city centres in these fairly large beasts. Even without the blade tip jet noise, they would’ve been pretty antisocial.

This beast was much, much noisier:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_XF-84H_Th...
Not only was it noisy, it set up a dreadful resonance which made people throw up.

GliderRider

2,851 posts

105 months

Wednesday 30th September 2020
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Fairey's own Gyrodyne for example and the Fairey Ultra Light - and nobody said a huge amount about the noise they made.
One of the many different jobs my Dad did when working at RAE Farnborough was to take noise measurements of the Fairey Gyrodyne. He was given a leather flying helmet for hearing protection... He considered this particular task to be why he was almost completely deaf in later life. He would say, 'If I can't see your lips, I can't hear you'.

I did see somewhere that by the time the Rotodyne was scrapped, there was already a cure for the worst of the noise it made.

Edited by GliderRider on Thursday 1st October 21:23

Zad

12,948 posts

260 months

Thursday 1st October 2020
quotequote all
From various accounts, the "Mk2" Rotodyne Z was going to be considerably quieter, although there are always going to be limits on what you can do, the tip jets were only lit on take-off and landing, so during cruise when the rotor was auto-gyro-ing they were relatively quiet. I suspect that if the US govt had pumped as much money into a Rotodyne-like machine as they did into the V22 / Osprey, then they would have ended up with a faster, safer and more flexible aircraft. After all, they did interesting things with the hovercraft LCAC.

Eric Mc

124,897 posts

289 months

Thursday 1st October 2020
quotequote all
I still think that it is a concept worth pursuing.

The Berkshire Museum of Aviation has a complete Gyrodyne on display.

Scotty2

1,433 posts

290 months

Thursday 1st October 2020
quotequote all
I think offshore rig supplies would suit the Rotodyne. Potentially safer than Helicopters.

City to City another potential - noise improvement a caveat.

JxJ Jr.

652 posts

94 months

Thursday 1st October 2020
quotequote all
Don't forget the Sud-Ouest Djinn which, with some 170+ made according to Google, was moderately successful.

hidetheelephants

33,929 posts

217 months

Thursday 1st October 2020
quotequote all
Tony1963 said:
As well as the noise problem, there wasn’t really a need for it. The dream was that people would travel from city centres in these fairly large beasts. Even without the blade tip jet noise, they would’ve been pretty antisocial.
Yes, those Chinooks you see flying around are a collective figment of the imagination; no use to the armed forces at all, they prefer to walk.

Tony1963

5,808 posts

186 months

Thursday 1st October 2020
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
Yes, those Chinooks you see flying around are a collective figment of the imagination; no use to the armed forces at all, they prefer to walk.
WTAF are you on about? The Chinook and Rotodyne have very little in common, and the Chinnok isn't really known for transporting commuters from city centre to nearby airport.