2nd RMS failure in 6000 miles. Advice required.
Discussion
I know this topic has been done to death and i myself posted on the last one to say that my RMS had been replaced and i saw no major issue, that was back in Nov 2004 when the vehicle (2003 996 C2) had covered 11448 miles. I have today been told by my local OPC that the RMS has again failed having only covered a further 6677 miles, not taking into account the time the car has been droping oil i should imagine the seal lasted approx 5500 miles and a total of seven months. The OPC has informed me that under warranty they are happy to replace it once again, i am concerned at the longevity of this part. My warranty expires in Sept and i now feel obliged to replace it just to cover the RMS, a situation i shouldn't find mysef in! Can anyone give me their views or advice on this matter? am i entitled to demand more? of should i accept the offer made by the OPC, is this issue devaluing the potential Resale value of my car given this info can be obtained on resale?
Dunno, but I'd say it was a no brainer getting the extended warranty on a car this expensive. I wouldn't buy it off you second hand without the OPC warranty...
Have you asked them about a replacement engine? I thought they did this under some circumstances, although that may only be when its out of tolerance by more than a certain amount.
If it wewre me I'd ask them why the seal is failing. (Don't expect a detailed answer!) I understand it's a more serious problem causing the seals to fail, mostly it's not a problem actually with the seals. (Crank bearing / floaty crank or soimething like that.) My advice would be to change the car straight after seal replacement unless the fundamental problem can be solved under warranty.
It is my intention to renew the warranty but this isn't the issue, my rant is at the very fact that this componant hasn't managed to cover 12,000 miles. If it was replaced now and i didn't renew the warranty and it failed again in 6k Porsche want nothing to do with it! Rough justice i say
Thanks Dan, That's the info i needed, i know the warranty is invaluable but i don't want the hassle of running the car back every 6k for an RMS. I'm not sure what damage the clutch has .... will suffer? unless the problem is resolved, and as i said earlier the stigma attached to the car will inevitably effect its desirability.
darrenraven said:
Nice idea but i'm not to keen on the styling ..... no offence to anyone it's just personal choice!! I'll see what the outcome is on the RMS and may very seriouly consider taking the hit and moving up to the Gt3. Wish i'd have thought more when i purchased the C2!
Fair enough. I didn't think the GT3 was too badly composed when I drove it on Sat - no worse than my Noble and the seats were softer which helps. Not my first choice car for potholes though. Personally I prefer the turbos styling - all part of life's rich tapestry!
Gassing Station | Porsche General | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff




What a bummer!