Discussion
Mainly because i'm fed up with missing shots because i'm in the middle of a lens change.
Plus there's the issue of cost. I can barely afford one L lens, let alone a number of them.
Edit:
What lenses would you reccommend? For a multiple L approach, i'd assume the following:
24-70 = £930
70-200 = £1400
100-400 = £1100
Making a grand total of just over £3400. Or, in PH terms, a perfectly decent trackday car.
>> Edited by agent006 on Wednesday 29th June 22:51
Plus there's the issue of cost. I can barely afford one L lens, let alone a number of them.
Edit:
What lenses would you reccommend? For a multiple L approach, i'd assume the following:
24-70 = £930
70-200 = £1400
100-400 = £1100
Making a grand total of just over £3400. Or, in PH terms, a perfectly decent trackday car.
>> Edited by agent006 on Wednesday 29th June 22:51
7dayshop.com prices
I'd go for
24-70 f2.8L USM (£849)
70-200 f2.8L USM (£769)
EF 2X II EXTENDER (£194)
Cheaper would be
24-70 f2.8L USM (£849)
70-200 f4L USM (£399)
EF 2X II EXTENDER (£194)
Or
24-70 f2.8L USM (£849)
100-400 f4.5/5.6L USM IS (£1039)
(although this leaves a "gap"
All against
28-300mm f/3.5-5.6 L IS USM (£1499)
Food for thought...
J
I'd go for
24-70 f2.8L USM (£849)
70-200 f2.8L USM (£769)
EF 2X II EXTENDER (£194)
Cheaper would be
24-70 f2.8L USM (£849)
70-200 f4L USM (£399)
EF 2X II EXTENDER (£194)
Or
24-70 f2.8L USM (£849)
100-400 f4.5/5.6L USM IS (£1039)
(although this leaves a "gap"
All against
28-300mm f/3.5-5.6 L IS USM (£1499)
Food for thought...
J
joust said:
Food for thought...
It is indeed. As a purely image quality solution then yours wins out.
I've missed countless shots switching lenses, and it's only a matter of time before my cackhandedness leaves at least one piece of my kit heading rapidly south towards a hard surface; so one lens to do the whole lot would be a nice thing to have.
Plus with a teleconverter i'd have the option of a 56-600 (albeit a rather dark one).
some very interesting comments here: www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/showproduct.php?product=217&sort=7&cat=27&page=3
Phil S said:True - I did say it was the cheaper option. I suppose it depends what you want the images for - if mainly "for the web" then you can crank up the ISO and then when you sample them back down to web size the noise will get removed.
But 70-200 f4 with 2x extender will give you a 140-400 f8 lens, a bit slow for track day use (especially in cloudy old England..)
J
Why has nobody mentioned this lens?...
www.canon.co.uk/For_Home/Product_Finder/Cameras/EF_Lenses/Zoom_Lenses/EF_35350mm_f3556L_USM/
Martin.
www.canon.co.uk/For_Home/Product_Finder/Cameras/EF_Lenses/Zoom_Lenses/EF_35350mm_f3556L_USM/
Martin.
V6GTO said:
Why has nobody mentioned this lens?...
www.canon.co.uk/For_Home/Product_Finder/Cameras/EF_Lenses/Zoom_Lenses/EF_35350mm_f3556L_USM/
Martin.
The 28-300 'replaced' the 35-350...
Gassing Station | Photography & Video | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



