War Of the Worlds
Author
Discussion

peterpeter

Original Poster:

6,438 posts

286 months

Friday 1st July 2005
quotequote all
saw this tonight..read quite a few rave reviews.

First half a hour is pretty awesome.

Then Tom's Kids get irritating. 10 minutes later, Im hoping the girl gets slaughtered fast.

The best special effect is the bit with the exploding bridge from the trailer.

nothing else really tops that.

the second half is pretty poor. There is a really tedious 20 minute section in the basement of Tim Robbins House, where the girl is even more irritating.

Incredible thing is, that Independence day, one of the cheesiest most stupid films of all time....was better.


Best part of the evening was the King Kong Trailer.





maserati3200gt

1,576 posts

263 months

Friday 1st July 2005
quotequote all
[quote=peterpeter]saw this tonight..read quite a few rave reviews.

First half a hour is pretty awesome.

Then Tom's Kids get irritating. 10 minutes later, Im hoping the girl gets slaughtered fast.

The best special effect is the bit with the exploding bridge from the trailer.

nothing else really tops that.

the second half is pretty poor. There is a really tedious 20 minute section in the basement of Tim Robbins House, where the girl is even more irritating.

Incredible thing is, that Independence day, one of the cheesiest most stupid films of all time....was better.


Best part of the evening was the King Kong Trailer.

very similar to what talk sport had said today.
P.S I loved Ind Day!
Good effects

dilbert

7,741 posts

260 months

Friday 1st July 2005
quotequote all
Are the Martians any good?

JonRB

80,038 posts

301 months

Friday 1st July 2005
quotequote all
Martians? Don't you know that the chances of anything coming from Mars are a million to one against?

peterpeter

Original Poster:

6,438 posts

286 months

Friday 1st July 2005
quotequote all
dilbert said:
Are the Martians any good?


not really, they just look like they were pulled out of the ET prop cupboard.

The tripods were quite impressive.

dilbert

7,741 posts

260 months

Friday 1st July 2005
quotequote all
Ahh but they were tripods and not floatey thingys made out of an old anglepoise lamp!

cinqster

1,057 posts

308 months

Friday 1st July 2005
quotequote all
Bet it no longer starts in Surrey?!

>> Edited by cinqster on Friday 1st July 00:48

maserati3200gt

1,576 posts

263 months

Friday 1st July 2005
quotequote all
dilbert said:
Ahh but they were tripods and not floatey thingys made out of an old anglepoise lamp!



LmaO !!!!

GavinPearson

5,715 posts

280 months

Friday 1st July 2005
quotequote all
I'm really disappointed. I wanted to see a film where the Martians go up Exhibition Road in London and destroy Imperial College (HG graduated from there) and then go on to Woking (he was from Woking). HG had the Martians destroy all the places he loathed.

Setting the film in America destroys the plot somewhat, then again perhaps I expect too much.

alexkp

16,484 posts

273 months

Friday 1st July 2005
quotequote all
Independence Day - despite rampant jingoism and about a supermarket's worth of cheese was great fun from beginning to end.

Apparently they are doing a sequal....

rsvmilly

11,288 posts

270 months

Friday 1st July 2005
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
'Thanksgiving'? (For saving the world again)

Pulsatingstar

1,719 posts

277 months

Friday 1st July 2005
quotequote all
dilbert said:
Are the Martians any good?


Are there even Martians in it? I heard they have made them come from somewhere else as we now know too much about Mars for it to seem feasable :|

fishtek69

535 posts

267 months

Friday 1st July 2005
quotequote all
I went to see this yesterday too, and came away with very mixed opinions of the film.

The scenes involving real sets were really impressive, about as good as they come in some respects. There's a scene involving a Boeing 747 that really takes some beating, such is the scale of the thing (apparently, a real 747 was used too). However, I found some of the CGI effects rather dissapointing, particularly the shots of people coming to an end when the alien machines first show themselves.

The film also ends rather abruptly. The middle 90 minutes are really intense, but then the film just ends really quickly and doesn't explain itself brilliantly. If you know the story already then you'll know basically what happens in the end; this ending just isn't explained well, and you are left with so many questions as to what happened here and there. It was almost as if they ran out of money and so just though 'what the hell, that'll do'.

There was also quite a few continuity mistakes. As an example, there is a scene where all electrical items have been disabled by an EMP (electro-magnetic pulse). And yet this guy is filming the arrival of the aliens with a camcorder, and the film even makes a feature of the camcorder and emphasises the fact that it's working...when it couldn't possibly work any more. You'll see what I mean when you see the film.

This film is very good, and as a piece of cinema it is brilliant. I think though it could have been made better.

I agree that, after 30 mins, I wanted to throw the little girl to the aliens myself - she's so annoying. I also agree that Independence Day is probably a more impressive film, bearing in mind it was made years ago.

Overall though, the film is definately worth a viewing.

Ecks Ridgehead

4,285 posts

257 months

Friday 1st July 2005
quotequote all
I haven't seen it...I was totally put off by the trailer. After Jeff Wayne's musical version, it just didn't sound right without Richard Burton saying the "No-one would have believed, in the last years of the 19th century, that human affairs were being watched from the timeless worlds of space..." line. American Trailer Man just doesn't cut it.

peterpeter

Original Poster:

6,438 posts

286 months

Friday 1st July 2005
quotequote all
Ecks Ridgehead said:
I haven't seen it...I was totally put off by the trailer. After Jeff Wayne's musical version, it just didn't sound right without Richard Burton saying the "No-one would have believed, in the last years of the 19th century, that human affairs were being watched from the timeless worlds of space..." line. American Trailer Man just doesn't cut it.


they do actually say that line at the start, sort of.

Its morgan freeman I think.

I think the original music would have helped too.

puggit

49,794 posts

277 months

Friday 1st July 2005
quotequote all
spoiler alert if you look below!

fishtek69 said:
The scenes involving real sets were really impressive, about as good as they come in some respects. There's a scene involving a Boeing 747 that really takes some beating, such is the scale of the thing (apparently, a real 747 was used too)
You can see this bit of the set on the Universal Studios tour in Hollywood

It was just as impressive in real life!


fishtek69

535 posts

267 months

Friday 1st July 2005
quotequote all
peterpeter said:

Ecks Ridgehead said:
I haven't seen it...I was totally put off by the trailer. After Jeff Wayne's musical version, it just didn't sound right without Richard Burton saying the "No-one would have believed, in the last years of the 19th century, that human affairs were being watched from the timeless worlds of space..." line. American Trailer Man just doesn't cut it.



they do actually say that line at the start, sort of.

Its morgan freeman I think.

I think the original music would have helped too.


Yeah, I loved that music. The sound effects and music in the new film are pretty good, but I miss that "waah-oo waah-oo waah-oo" sound from the Richard Burton musical version.

The new alien tripod thingy's do make a cool low-pitched two-tone foghorn type of sound though - sounded awesome in the cinema, and even quite scary and times.

And yeah, it sounded like Morgan Freeman to me too.

yertis

19,711 posts

295 months

Friday 1st July 2005
quotequote all
A version set in Victorian England would be so cool, infinitely cooler than the modern day US (which will anyway look out of date within the decade, like some spastic 1970's "Towering Posiedon '78" type rubbish). The US makes me sick actually, with their myopic cultural scope.

Like Titanic, I refuse to see this film on principle.

.Adam.

1,867 posts

292 months

Friday 1st July 2005
quotequote all
Have just read that Jeff Wayne is going to do a CG version of the film, following the book closely, so I guess that might have the proper music, and maybe even use the Richard Burton narration.

stesrg

1,578 posts

267 months

Friday 1st July 2005
quotequote all
fishtek69 said:
There was also quite a few continuity mistakes. As an example, there is a scene where all electrical items have been disabled by an EMP (electro-magnetic pulse). And yet this guy is filming the arrival of the aliens with a camcorder, and the film even makes a feature of the camcorder and emphasises the fact that it's working...when it couldn't possibly work any more.


Hmm I thought this was set in the 50s hence the camcorder would have been a wind up jobie as you said a 747 is in the film, is it war of the worlds modern day then?
Ste...