The best supercars to buy in 2020
Discussion
https://www.pistonheads.com/news/ph-features/the-b...
Can't disagree with their selection, but it is rather disappointing that they have used the stock Racing Green photo rather than one of far better photos on this forum
Can't disagree with their selection, but it is rather disappointing that they have used the stock Racing Green photo rather than one of far better photos on this forum
TVRMs said:
Bit thin on actual super cars?
Define Supercar.. At what point does a Sports Car become a Supercar?They even say they have stretched it a bit to make the list.. Don't think there are many supercars for 25k, Cerbera probably is the closest thing and used to give Supercars of era a bloody nose. A supercar for the average Joe perhaps.
TVRMs said:
Jhonno said:
TVRMs said:
Bit thin on actual super cars?
Define Supercar.. At what point does a Sports Car become a Supercar?They even say they have stretched it a bit to make the list.. Don't think there are many supercars for 25k, Cerbera probably is the closest thing and used to give Supercars of era a bloody nose. A supercar for the average Joe perhaps.
Can’t find a definition, so more perception and opinion?
Edited by anonymous-user on Sunday 29th November 07:59
TVRMs said:
Don’t think there are any super cars for 25k. A Cerb delivers good performance for 25k, but not sure it’s a super car.
Can’t find a definition, so more perception and opinion?
In it's day, it made a mockery of most things we do still regard as supercars - Top Gear magazine stated that to catch a Cerbera you needed to have an F1, and F50 or a pretty fast bike. That sounds pretty super to me Can’t find a definition, so more perception and opinion?

900T-R said:
TVRMs said:
Don’t think there are any super cars for 25k. A Cerb delivers good performance for 25k, but not sure it’s a super car.
Can’t find a definition, so more perception and opinion?
In it's day, it made a mockery of most things we do still regard as supercars - Top Gear magazine stated that to catch a Cerbera you needed to have an F1, and F50 or a pretty fast bike. That sounds pretty super to me Can’t find a definition, so more perception and opinion?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XGATSb54YEQ&in...
For me, the performance is no longer ‘supercar’.
But, the experience absolutely is.
Get out of a manual GT3 (admittedly not as fast as it’s peers), and the Cerbera doesn’t feel lacking in performance. It does feel just as special, if not more so, because it’s got so much depth of character (classic vs modern) and it’s so dam unique.
But chasing a GT3 on ‘give and take’ roads, and the 25 year gap suddenly seems so obvious.
But, the experience absolutely is.
Get out of a manual GT3 (admittedly not as fast as it’s peers), and the Cerbera doesn’t feel lacking in performance. It does feel just as special, if not more so, because it’s got so much depth of character (classic vs modern) and it’s so dam unique.
But chasing a GT3 on ‘give and take’ roads, and the 25 year gap suddenly seems so obvious.
The ´supercar´ moniker should be seen in the context of its time or half the cars listed under that banner in the back pages of Evo would not be there anymore... I mean, any current hot hatchback would see off a Countach without breaking a sweat.
Imran999 said:
For me, the performance is no longer ‘supercar’.
But, the experience absolutely is.
Get out of a manual GT3 (admittedly not as fast as it’s peers), and the Cerbera doesn’t feel lacking in performance. It does feel just as special, if not more so, because it’s got so much depth of character (classic vs modern) and it’s so dam unique.
But chasing a GT3 on ‘give and take’ roads, and the 25 year gap suddenly seems so obvious.
But, the experience absolutely is.
Get out of a manual GT3 (admittedly not as fast as it’s peers), and the Cerbera doesn’t feel lacking in performance. It does feel just as special, if not more so, because it’s got so much depth of character (classic vs modern) and it’s so dam unique.
But chasing a GT3 on ‘give and take’ roads, and the 25 year gap suddenly seems so obvious.
Imran999 said:
For me, the performance is no longer ‘supercar’.
But, the experience absolutely is.
Get out of a manual GT3 (admittedly not as fast as it’s peers), and the Cerbera doesn’t feel lacking in performance. It does feel just as special, if not more so, because it’s got so much depth of character (classic vs modern) and it’s so dam unique.
But chasing a GT3 on ‘give and take’ roads, and the 25 year gap suddenly seems so obvious.
This is a interesting one, have just sold my cerb ajp and stillBut, the experience absolutely is.
Get out of a manual GT3 (admittedly not as fast as it’s peers), and the Cerbera doesn’t feel lacking in performance. It does feel just as special, if not more so, because it’s got so much depth of character (classic vs modern) and it’s so dam unique.
But chasing a GT3 on ‘give and take’ roads, and the 25 year gap suddenly seems so obvious.
owning a 992 4s, you can really see how things have moved on in the car world. The cerb couldn’t even get close to it in terms of speed and handling, but it made up for in in charm and raw driving experience.
The cerb v8 is by no means a slow car but and back in the 90s I would imagine it could shift with the best of them.
Like you say it’s not all about performance, it’s about the charm / feeling a enjoyable cars offers.
My tricky dilemma is what can I now replace my cerb with.
GT4RS said:
The cerb v8 is by no means a slow car but and back in the 90s I would imagine it could shift with the best of them.
Other than the engine management, which is mainly there to reduce emissions and improve efficiencyIs there any part of the AJP8 Cerb that couldn't have been built in the 60s?
ukkid35 said:
GT4RS said:
The cerb v8 is by no means a slow car but and back in the 90s I would imagine it could shift with the best of them.
Other than the engine management, which is mainly there to reduce emissions and improve efficiencyIs there any part of the AJP8 Cerb that couldn't have been built in the 60s?
Ultimately if the design of something existed it could have been made years ago, just perhaps in a more manual/different way..
Everything is an evolution.
Jhonno said:
I'd say you could argue that about a lot of cars.
Ultimately if the design of something existed it could have been made years ago, just perhaps in a more manual/different way..
Everything is an evolution.
I don't t think so, there's pretty much no difference between the construction of a Cerb and a Griffith 200Ultimately if the design of something existed it could have been made years ago, just perhaps in a more manual/different way..
Everything is an evolution.
Consider the difference between a Fifth Gen Fiesta and a Ford Anglia
Yes there is evolution for both, but the mass produced cars have been transformed both by technology and construction techniques
ukkid35 said:
I don't t think so, there's pretty much no difference between the construction of a Cerb and a Griffith 200
Consider the difference between a Fifth Gen Fiesta and a Ford Anglia
Yes there is evolution for both, but the mass produced cars have been transformed both by technology and construction techniques
The monocoque chassis, discs, injection, aluminium panels etc etc existed in the 60's Ford just didn't use it at the time. Technology is a given, but a Cerb isn't about aids/Sat Nav etc.Consider the difference between a Fifth Gen Fiesta and a Ford Anglia
Yes there is evolution for both, but the mass produced cars have been transformed both by technology and construction techniques
Gassing Station | Cerbera | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff