What to do?
Author
Discussion

Drawweight

Original Poster:

3,596 posts

145 months

Wednesday 9th December 2020
quotequote all
Background: my wife and her 2 brothers each have a share in her late fathers house.
It’s a semi in a scruffy northern city worth approx £110k and has a sitting tenant.

The tenant is fine and pays regularly but as you can imagine split 3 ways (plus upkeep) it’s not a lot each. Besides we could all do with a decent lump sum each.

We have offered it to the tenant but she can only raise £85k which is a fair bit short.

What should we do? Kick the tenant out and try to sell it on the open market? Try and sell it with sitting tenant and would anyone want it and would they pay market price?

One of the brothers has a mate (I know rolleyes) who suggested getting an interest only mortgage of £75k and using the rent to pay said mortgage. Split the £75k but I’m unsure how this works, if it’s even possible and what happens later.

Any ideas how to maximise the income?

clockworks

7,673 posts

174 months

Wednesday 9th December 2020
quotequote all
Gut feeling: sell to the tenant for £85k.

OK, it's £25k under the possible open market value (without a sitting tenant), but split that 3 ways, and your missus is only down £8k.
You'll also save on estate agent's fees, and hopefully get the money a lot faster than waiting for the tenant to leave, then trying to sell.

Skyedriver

23,393 posts

311 months

Wednesday 9th December 2020
quotequote all
clockworks said:
Gut feeling: sell to the tenant for £85k.

OK, it's £25k under the possible open market value (without a sitting tenant), but split that 3 ways, and your missus is only down £8k.
You'll also save on estate agent's fees, and hopefully get the money a lot faster than waiting for the tenant to leave, then trying to sell.
Sounds the simplest way around this.
Save Estate Agent fees for a start, and the hassle of trying to split the monthly income and more so who pays the maintenance, arranges foe repairs etc.
You get the money and invest wisely and that shortfall of £8k will soon disappear.

Nick928

365 posts

184 months

Wednesday 9th December 2020
quotequote all
Assuming it’s a formal tenancy with a signed contract then an investor will definitely be interested at anything below market price.
I’d certainly suggest speaking to an estate agent before throwing £25k down the toilet.

Caddyshack

14,790 posts

235 months

Wednesday 9th December 2020
quotequote all
All 3 parties could get a buy to let on it but it may be an issue if a true sitting tenant as the solicitor may need to report to the lender that there is not vacant possession when the mortgage is put in place and not on an AST.

Edited to add: the vacant possession is probably only relevant if property is being transferred at same time.

Edited by Caddyshack on Wednesday 9th December 20:45

Thin White Duke

2,422 posts

189 months

Wednesday 9th December 2020
quotequote all
If I was one of the three involved I'd want the easiest option - sell to the tenant and take my circa £28k.

Nickbrapp

5,277 posts

159 months

Wednesday 9th December 2020
quotequote all
I think I would also sell to the tenant, you may be
Down a bit but you’ll change that woman’s life, good chance she would never be able to buy a house otherwise

As said by the time you’ve paid EA fees etc especially

Drawweight

Original Poster:

3,596 posts

145 months

Wednesday 9th December 2020
quotequote all

Thanks all.

I’ve got some figures.

The woman pays £525 per month.We’ve had 2 valuations done both around the £100k mark but I’ve no idea the market just now. The house is in Rochdale btw.

Now if we were to advertise the property even at £90k I make that a yield of 14% if my method is correct .Is that enough to interest an investor?

Another complication is we’re not sure if the tenant can afford even the £85k

Wilmslowboy

4,762 posts

235 months

Wednesday 9th December 2020
quotequote all
Drawweight said:
Thanks all.

I’ve got some figures.

The woman pays £525 per month.We’ve had 2 valuations done both around the £100k mark but I’ve no idea the market just now. The house is in Rochdale btw.

Now if we were to advertise the property even at £90k I make that a yield of 14% if my method is correct .Is that enough to interest an investor?

Another complication is we’re not sure if the tenant can afford even the £85k
£525 * 12 = £6,300 / £90,000 = 7% yield (before costs) - that is not a great result for a northern town.








Drawweight

Original Poster:

3,596 posts

145 months

Thursday 10th December 2020
quotequote all
Wilmslowboy said:
£525 * 12 = £6,300 / £90,000 = 7% yield (before costs) - that is not a great result for a northern town.
Cheers, I got that formula the wrong way round silly

The consensus in the family I think will be to offer it to the woman first then just put it on the market at the beginning of the year.

mjcneat

285 posts

198 months

Thursday 10th December 2020
quotequote all
Oh Rochdale, that "scruffy Northern" town.


NickCQ

5,392 posts

125 months

Thursday 10th December 2020
quotequote all
Not seeing much of Rochdale in that picture...

TR4man

5,527 posts

203 months

Thursday 10th December 2020
quotequote all
NickCQ said:
Not seeing much of Rochdale in that picture...
Be thankful

Mr Whippy

32,453 posts

270 months

Thursday 10th December 2020
quotequote all
Isn’t there something about selling an inherited asset “cheap“, as in HMRC worrying itself over losing out on any cap gains.

Definitely worth double checking on the sell cheap to get rid angle and any issues.

bristoltype603

256 posts

76 months

Thursday 10th December 2020
quotequote all
One word: Auction

It's an arms length sale so HMRC will be happy. It's quick so not months (years?) of waiting on a tenant who may or may not be able to scrape together some money. It's precisely the type of property that buyers at auction want. Also as there is more than one executor you need to move fast because sooner or later they'll all start disagreeing.


Enut

1,003 posts

102 months

Thursday 10th December 2020
quotequote all
Mr Whippy said:
Isn’t there something about selling an inherited asset “cheap“, as in HMRC worrying itself over losing out on any cap gains.

Definitely worth double checking on the sell cheap to get rid angle and any issues.
I think there is far more chance of HMRC getting involved if you inherit an asset (property in this example) and then sell relatively quickly for a large gain. They might well get a small amount of CGT but they may well be interested in case they missed out on a bigger chunk of IHT, for example if the property was under valued at probate.

Enut

1,003 posts

102 months

Thursday 10th December 2020
quotequote all
mjcneat said:
Oh Rochdale, that "scruffy Northern" town.

If it's the property in the picture I'll give you £110K!

LeadFarmer

7,411 posts

160 months

Friday 11th December 2020
quotequote all
Enut said:
mjcneat said:
Oh Rochdale, that "scruffy Northern" town.

If it's the property in the picture I'll give you £110K!
House Insurance company - "Do you live near water, a lake or a river"?
Enut - "Errrrrr, ummmmm, errrrr ........... no"
House insurance company - "This call is being recorded"
Enut - "Errrrr, ummmmm...." (puts phone down)


Edited by LeadFarmer on Friday 11th December 09:50

Iamnotkloot

1,903 posts

176 months

Friday 11th December 2020
quotequote all
LeadFarmer said:
House Insurance company - "Do you live near water, a lake or a river"?
Enut - "Errrrrr, ummmmm, errrrr ........... no"
House insurance company - "This call is being recorded"
Enut - "Errrrr, ummmmm...." (puts phone down)


Edited by LeadFarmer on Friday 11th December 09:50
Like that smile

I live near'ish Rochdale, I'd say a typical picture would look more like this:


Mr Whippy

32,453 posts

270 months

Friday 11th December 2020
quotequote all
Enut said:
Mr Whippy said:
Isn’t there something about selling an inherited asset “cheap“, as in HMRC worrying itself over losing out on any cap gains.

Definitely worth double checking on the sell cheap to get rid angle and any issues.
I think there is far more chance of HMRC getting involved if you inherit an asset (property in this example) and then sell relatively quickly for a large gain. They might well get a small amount of CGT but they may well be interested in case they missed out on a bigger chunk of IHT, for example if the property was under valued at probate.
You’d be mad to under value at probate if it falls into the tax free allowance, to then definitely have a capital gain.

So I suppose it depends.