National Education Union - announcement due...
Discussion
Just had a tip off from a teacher friend that the NEU have called an emergency executive meeting for tomorrow with an announcement expected regarding primary schools returning on Monday 4th. Wording states ‘proposed opening of primary schools’.
Any other NEU members received this?
Wonder if a walkout is pending??
Any other NEU members received this?
Wonder if a walkout is pending??
21TonyK said:
I think so as that article relates to London only, this may come as a shock to some but there is more to the UK than London.......RammyMP said:
I don’t know why the government seem to think primary school teachers and school staff are expendable. If it’s not safe for senior schools how’s it safe for junior schools?
Are they saying it’s not safe for secondary school staff? I thought secondary schools were staying closed to prepare them for mass testing which is being implemented to stop secondary school kids and their families spreading it within the community. ie nothing to do with protecting teachers?wiggy001 said:
RammyMP said:
I don’t know why the government seem to think primary school teachers and school staff are expendable. If it’s not safe for senior schools how’s it safe for junior schools?
Are they saying it’s not safe for secondary school staff? I thought secondary schools were staying closed to prepare them for mass testing which is being implemented to stop secondary school kids and their families spreading it within the community. ie nothing to do with protecting teachers?RammyMP said:
I don’t know why the government seem to think primary school teachers and school staff are expendable. If it’s not safe for senior schools how’s it safe for junior schools?
Risk, reward and practicalities.The older the kids, the more able they are to learn remotely.
Nobody is saying that everyone who gets the virus is going to die. No one has ever said that. So the whole "expendable" line is frankly bulls
t. Teachers in at risk groups are still able to self-isolate (certainly they do at our kids' school).What they are saying is that they want the minimum number of people at risk of contracting and spreading the virus when balanced against the "reward". In this instance it means ensuring the education of younger kids isn't seriously compromised.
That whole balance and equation likely also figures in that the older the kids are, the more risky contracting the virus could be. (I get that someone will quote 0.000000001% risk of people over 16 being harmed etc...but those people don't have to stand in front of news crews when a 16yr old dies...more importantly, if it were their 16yr old their view on things would be *very* different).
RammyMP said:
I don’t know why the government seem to think primary school teachers and school staff are expendable. If it’s not safe for senior schools how’s it safe for junior schools?
Secondary school kids can be left home alone,primary ones cant,so parents cant go to work & keep the economy afloat/make profits for the bosseskowalski655 said:
RammyMP said:
I don’t know why the government seem to think primary school teachers and school staff are expendable. If it’s not safe for senior schools how’s it safe for junior schools?
Secondary school kids can be left home alone,primary ones cant,so parents cant go to work & keep the economy afloat/make profits for the bossesTCX said:
kowalski655 said:
RammyMP said:
I don’t know why the government seem to think primary school teachers and school staff are expendable. If it’s not safe for senior schools how’s it safe for junior schools?
Secondary school kids can be left home alone,primary ones cant,so parents cant go to work & keep the economy afloat/make profits for the bossesDelay the start so schools can arrange testing, that’s a joke too, the government should be arranging that not school staff, they should be teaching.
My daughter is 11, I can’t leave her at home all day while I’m at work, if she’s not back in school soon she might have to come work with me.
It’s all a s
t show.SpeckledJim said:
wiggy001 said:
RammyMP said:
I don’t know why the government seem to think primary school teachers and school staff are expendable. If it’s not safe for senior schools how’s it safe for junior schools?
Are they saying it’s not safe for secondary school staff? I thought secondary schools were staying closed to prepare them for mass testing which is being implemented to stop secondary school kids and their families spreading it within the community. ie nothing to do with protecting teachers?
ks that implies anyone who contracts Covid will die. Despite government figures that show a mortality rate is very low and even lower when you consider that ‘deaths within 28 days is what’s being measured. ONS figures for first wave - The rate of COVID-19-related deaths among teaching and educational professionals, which for the purposes of the data collection excludes TAs, educational support assistants, lunchtime and crossing patrols, school secretaries and advisers and inspectors, was 6.7 per 100,000 for men and 3.3 for women.
Compare with death rates in other sectors. Health is misleading as it includes frontline as well as non contact professions

As NHS frontline seeing COVID patients every day. I and my colleagues are pretty p
ed off with the antics of teaching unions
Compare with death rates in other sectors. Health is misleading as it includes frontline as well as non contact professions
As NHS frontline seeing COVID patients every day. I and my colleagues are pretty p
ed off with the antics of teaching unionsGassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


