Audi Q5 2.0T or 3.2?
Audi Q5 2.0T or 3.2?
Author
Discussion

900sAds

Original Poster:

306 posts

223 months

Tuesday 26th January 2021
quotequote all
Hi All,

I am looking at Q5's to replace my wife's MK5 Golf GTI.

As there are limitations with dealers being open at the moment and lot of them requesting deposits, and no contact purchase etc, it' seems it will be difficult to get to drive a Q5 with both engines to compare (2.0T or 3.2). We are not planning to buy new, so it will be unlikely that a local non Audi dealer would have both engines available to test drive. We will test drive before committing to a purchase, however, as you can appreciate, I want to limit contact and I don't want to waste anyone's time either.

I was wondering if anyone had any opinions on what what engine suits the Q5 best? There are not many 3.2's around, so is it worth waiting for one with the right spec to come up? or is the 2.0 sufficient?

Thanks,
Ads.

Ranger 6

7,639 posts

277 months

Tuesday 26th January 2021
quotequote all
IMHO SUVs are always better with a torquey motor. They're certainly not sports cars so a wafty engine is preferable.

ZX10R NIN

30,480 posts

153 months

Tuesday 26th January 2021
quotequote all
The 3.2 is the sweeter engine & suited to the the Q5.

900sAds

Original Poster:

306 posts

223 months

Tuesday 26th January 2021
quotequote all
Looks like the 3.2 gets the most votes then. Thanks.

I'll keep an eye out as three are only 3 in budget on AT. Plus I need to sell our car first.

Hfs1889

60 posts

84 months

Tuesday 26th January 2021
quotequote all
I have a 2019 Q5 Quattro with the 45 TFSI (245 BHP) engine and don’t mind it. I drive to work and back on speed restricted roads and sometimes jump on the motorway for a junction or 2 for change of scenery. I also have access to and frequent use of (once a week to work and back) a 2017 SQ5 (petrol).

It’s not rocket science to guess which I prefer but if you aren’t going to be able to thrash it around then the 2 litre is fine. It’s very light and easy to handle, it just whines a bit when I accelerate compared to the burble of the SQ5. I wouldn’t want to pull a caravan in mine though, you’d need the 3L for that.

My wife has a 2017 Disco 5 3L diesel and I actually prefer the drive in mine to hers as it’s much less prone to roll, but hers is a nicer place to sit and a better driving position.

Pistonheader101

2,206 posts

135 months

Tuesday 26th January 2021
quotequote all
2.0T is actually a great engine and suits the Q5 well. With a remap it’s the same power, if not slightly faster than the 3.2. Doesn’t sound as nice however

ZX10R NIN

30,480 posts

153 months

Wednesday 27th January 2021
quotequote all
Hfs1889 said:
I have a 2019 Q5 Quattro with the 45 TFSI (245 BHP) engine and don’t mind it. I drive to work and back on speed restricted roads and sometimes jump on the motorway for a junction or 2 for change of scenery. I also have access to and frequent use of (once a week to work and back) a 2017 SQ5 (petrol).

It’s not rocket science to guess which I prefer but if you aren’t going to be able to thrash it around then the 2 litre is fine. It’s very light and easy to handle, it just whines a bit when I accelerate compared to the burble of the SQ5. I wouldn’t want to pull a caravan in mine though, you’d need the 3L for that.

My wife has a 2017 Disco 5 3L diesel and I actually prefer the drive in mine to hers as it’s much less prone to roll, but hers is a nicer place to sit and a better driving position.
I think the OP will be looking at the older 208 model.

900sAds

Original Poster:

306 posts

223 months

Wednesday 27th January 2021
quotequote all
Hi,

Thanks for all your comments. For clarification, yes, I will be looking at the first gen model with a budget up to around £18k, which sadly rules out the SQ5.

The car will be used as a family car, carrying bikes (will need to fit a tow bar) and for camping maybe twice a year (may need a roof box as camping with an A6 Avant has been challenging due to the size of the air tent).