4.5 V 4.5LW
4.5 V 4.5LW
Author
Discussion

obiwonkeyblokey

Original Poster:

5,400 posts

269 months

Wednesday 6th July 2005
quotequote all
I know this has been covered but i need to know if both modeals were available in 2001, if so what were the price differences, and in the masses opinion was it worth it then and what premium would a LW attract now over a 4.5 of the same year and mileage.

also, what are the main differences.

thanks in advance

Nickccc

1,682 posts

277 months

Wednesday 6th July 2005
quotequote all
all 2001 cerb's are light weight's are they not?
Nick

obiwonkeyblokey

Original Poster:

5,400 posts

269 months

Wednesday 6th July 2005
quotequote all
thats what i was wondering, perhaps we are about to find out....

kojak

4,547 posts

282 months

Wednesday 6th July 2005
quotequote all
About 40 kg.

Lighter bonnet, bootlid, doors etc..

There are also minor alterations on other things as well.

Nickccc

1,682 posts

277 months

Wednesday 6th July 2005
quotequote all
Obi, when I first got my 4.5 2001 LW RR I asked a few questions. One owner here Cerbhead posted this for me.
I think it shiul answer some of your requests.
Lightweight? Well not exactly - what the factory did was to use some of the new-fangled 'jaycloth' tissue they the new Tuscan range used, instead of 100% glassfibre on the bonnet, doors and boot lid. It is slightly lighter but the main thing is it is better in crash situations. However some early cars had rattles in the doors and some less than optimal panel fits.

Wheels: Most/many 4.5/4.2 Cerberas scrape their rear tyres over fast/power-on bumps. The rear suspenders on your car have been fine-tuned by the factory over the years and feature harder springs and dampers and thicker roll bar than prior models. It is set for 8.5J rims with 255 tyres and 'Cerbera' offset. Given the vagueries of GRP production this may cause graunching on some cars. If you have a real problem with this, it is better to replace the std dampers with ones with adjustable platforms (and generally stiffen the springing/damping at the same time - 325lbs-350lbs springs and Nitrons are the ral trick) and setting the ride height correctly rather than bothering with Tuscan wheels. This will stop bump-graunch except in extremis.

Front Tyres/Steering: The factory reworked the geometry and suspension for your car as well. However the steering can still be a bit sharp and if you want to soften it some more, fit 235 tyres instead of 225. The wider tread gives greater flex on the 8.5J rims - note: same rims as rears which have 255's. Its not really worth going to 40% ratio tyres as then it is possible to feel the extra flex in sharp corners and it doesn't really work in terms of 'comfort'.

In terms of engine what you have that is different to std 4.5 is: High compression head with gas-flowed ports, bigger injectors and more aggressive ECU mapping. Should produce somewhere around 400 bhp on the rolling road. Sorry - factory bhps are not 'in car' and so you won't get the advertised 440bhp, unless on a very rose-tinted rolling road! But - the engine power delivery is a hell of a lot better than a std 4.5 which is somewhat lethargic - don't belive the marketing blurb.

The 95/98 button: the RR's ECU is set-up for high-octane petrol (because of the higher compression) and is much more aggressive (ie favours power rather than economy/greenery). However if you are cruising gently across Europe and using almost zero throttle (as if!) then the you can use 95 petrol as long as you 'press the button'..... But.... When you press the button the ECU does not change fuelling, all it does is add a 2 degree retard to the ignition timing. - you are still running a 4.5 litre high-compression engine and if you use anywhere near full throttle under more than average load with 95 octane you are very likely to get detonation - eg. being a bit exuberant at traffic lights. This will quickly wreck your engine - BE WARNED.

Finally: Tyre pressures are important - check regularly or you will start complaining. Watch the oil level, check weekly/daily - the wet sump is sensitive to levels and the engine runs under much higher levels of strain than 'normal' cars. I shouldn't have to say this but... Look after the Leather - every week!
Nick.

tvrinbfg

1,460 posts

313 months

Wednesday 6th July 2005
quotequote all
The LW was launched at the October 1999 Motorshow and the first cars started appearing in the November/December on "V" plates. At the time, TVR claimed they were 80kgs lighter, but I think 40 is more likely.

yg649

145 posts

284 months

Wednesday 6th July 2005
quotequote all
.. not that it helps your question, but I just like to say it ...


... I've got that very 1999 Motorshow car

>> Edited by yg649 on Wednesday 6th July 22:38

Steve_T

6,356 posts

301 months

Wednesday 6th July 2005
quotequote all
Rumour has it that a big lunch is sufficient to offset the difference the lightweight bits make. This of course is pure speculation.

Steve.

obiwonkeyblokey

Original Poster:

5,400 posts

269 months

Thursday 7th July 2005
quotequote all
Thanks guys,

so safe to say then that ALL 4.5's from 2001 onwards are the same