Another royal on the way.

[TTmonkey]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56065300

I’m yawning already

[TTmonkey]

Lol auto text has struck.


Could an admin alter the thread title please?

[Craigyp79]

Will it be a Corgi?

[PeteinSQ]

I thought you were just being offensive!

[TTmonkey]

PeteinSQ said:

I thought you were just being offensive!

I just don’t know how that happened... these iPads make so much stuff up when you aren’t checking before submitting.



Thanks Admin!

[anonymous-user]

Craigyp79 said:

Will it be a Corgi?

shapeshifting lizard.

[CaptainSlow]

I thought they were saving the planet and only having one? Or was that for everyone else?

[ReallyReallyGood]

Will the child be British, American, Canadian, or..... actually I DGAF

[glennjamin]

She's really adding to her responsibilities list for when they split....

[105.4]

CaptainSlow said:

I thought they were saving the planet and only having one? Or was that for everyone else?

Yep, that rule only applies to the plebs.

A couple we know lambasted my Wife for “killing the planet” when we had our daughter, (our only child).

Meanwhile they are on their 5th child

[105.4]

The Spruce Goose said:

shapeshifting lizard.

Neither. I’d put money on the child being ‘gender non-binary’.

[milkround]

I'm not sure what the negativity is. A married couple in the public eye are having a second child. As far as I'm concerned the best of luck to them. I hope they have a happy healthy child.

I really don't get it. In terms of people to dislike they are ridiculously down the list. I'd rather condemn members of the royal family who are suspected child abusers personally.

[rfisher]

Already said it's a boy.

Obviously the sprog can decide its gender later (not).

Odious couple.

I feel sorry for HM Liz - she won't be seeing this grandchild either.

Charlie won't be that bothered.

[towser44]

milkround said:

I'm not sure what the negativity is. A married couple in the public eye are having a second child. As far as I'm concerned the best of luck to them. I hope they have a happy healthy child.

I really don't get it. In terms of people to dislike they are ridiculously down the list. I'd rather condemn members of the royal family who are suspected child abusers personally.

I think it's because they have previously come out and gave a limit on the number of children people should have to 'limit environmental impact' when it's not really their business to do so, likewise it's none of ours what they do, albeit they did say they would limit their number to 2.

[survivalist]

milkround said:

I'm not sure what the negativity is. A married couple in the public eye are having a second child. As far as I'm concerned the best of luck to them. I hope they have a happy healthy child.

I really don't get it. In terms of people to dislike they are ridiculously down the list. I'd rather condemn members of the royal family who are suspected child abusers personally.

Indeed. But to some they aren’t British enough, or grateful, or some other patriotic nonsense. Who knows ...

[Johnnytheboy]

I wonder if this one will be christened with a real name or another nickname?

[Wacky Racer]

Harry's gone from hero to zero in five years.

[TwigtheWonderkid]

Well I'm no royalist, and have no real interest in them to be honest, but.......a young couple are expecting a baby. In my world, that's a nice thing. Perhaps I'm out of touch.

[TTmonkey]

rfisher said:

Already said it's a boy.

Obviously the sprog can decide its gender later

Charlie won't be that bothered.

They’ve not said if it’s a boy or girl. Just that Archie is going to be a big brother.

[survivalist]

Wacky Racer said:

Harry's gone from hero to zero in five years.

Quote the revise for me.

He went from a saccharin poster boy for those who don’t like to think for themselves, to someone who realised that he probably had another 5-6 decades on this earth and decided to live for himself, rather than others.

Good on him.