Young Goldman Sachs bankers ask for 80-hour week cap
Young Goldman Sachs bankers ask for 80-hour week cap
Author
Discussion

robinessex

Original Poster:

11,837 posts

203 months

Friday 19th March 2021
quotequote all
Young Goldman Sachs bankers ask for an 80-hour week cap. This is down from 95hrs per week. Excuse me for thinking, but this is just bks. I've put in 50 hrs a week occasionally in the past for short periods for urgent work, and I know how draining it is. Falling asleep at the keyboard wasn't unusual. Just how does management think a human being can function effectively working like this? I believe air traffic control operatives only work in short bursts, 2hrs max, and then a break. Exhaustive monitoring has shown this to be the limit for intense concentration by a human.

PS. Goldman Sachs reported net revenues of $44.6bn (£32.1bn) for 2020.

Boobonman

5,695 posts

214 months

Friday 19th March 2021
quotequote all
I'm in the film industry and 80-100hr weeks are not uncommon.

swisstoni

22,061 posts

301 months

Friday 19th March 2021
quotequote all
He will end up burnt out but minted.
That’s the deal with the devil they all understand when they join.

Roger Irrelevant

3,307 posts

135 months

Friday 19th March 2021
quotequote all
I predict that this thread will very quickly turn into the Four Yorkshiremen.

robinessex

Original Poster:

11,837 posts

203 months

Friday 19th March 2021
quotequote all
Boobonman said:
I'm in the film industry and 80-100hr weeks are not uncommon.
You spend 60% of your week at work? Must be interesting and exciting. It's not always the hours, it's the amount of that time when you are expected to be concentrating that's the issue.

BrettMRC

5,472 posts

182 months

Friday 19th March 2021
quotequote all
Not that different from the operating model of some of the Big Four and other consultancy firms.

You're an absolute mug if you engage with that working pattern as the norm - money is no good to you if you're dead.

MC Bodge

27,310 posts

197 months

Friday 19th March 2021
quotequote all
You'd need to love the work to put up with that. The money is fairly irrelevant if you spend your whole waking life at work anyway and end up twice divorced, with serious physical and mental health issues.

SmoothCriminal

5,766 posts

221 months

Friday 19th March 2021
quotequote all
Air traffic controllers potentially have thousands of peoples lives in their hands, think that's a bit different from spending other peoples money.

bristolracer

5,873 posts

171 months

Friday 19th March 2021
quotequote all
Boobonman said:
I'm in the film industry and 80-100hr weeks are not uncommon.
Yes but you have downtime between productions?

Tye Green

949 posts

131 months

Friday 19th March 2021
quotequote all
many small business owners will be doing those hours

AngryYorkshireman

138 posts

67 months

Friday 19th March 2021
quotequote all
Most people can't work productively for those hours.
I've done it on the odd occasion when needed, but, not for months on end.

The only people I've ever known work like that in an employed job month to month have generally been disorganised and have nothing else in their life. They're been usually unreliable at getting things done as part of a team as they assume everyone else is happy to go to a meeting at 9pm or 6am to meet deadlines.

I've experienced it with offshore teams as well - and they've not exactly noted for their high productivity.

Suspect in many cases it's young people being exploited - being promised the world and not wanting to be seen to be the lazy one.

Can understand it totally if you're running your own business - but, at the end of the day, you reap the rewards.

Boobonman

5,695 posts

214 months

Friday 19th March 2021
quotequote all
bristolracer said:
Boobonman said:
I'm in the film industry and 80-100hr weeks are not uncommon.
Yes but you have downtime between productions?
Thats the general idea, in practice one job runs into another.

InitialDave

14,260 posts

141 months

Friday 19th March 2021
quotequote all
I've pulled weeks like that, but only on occasion for end of month "crunch" scenarios. Being expected to do it by default? Nope, not happening.

I think the issue is there will always be someone who thinks being willing to do it will get them in well with those in charge, and so it becomes known that you can make these types of demands on people and you'll probably find someone to do it. If someone won't, or used to and burned out? Throw them away and get another out the pile.

Not a good thing, really.

I agree, a big chunk of money is nice, but as with long or bad commutes, or dealing with knobs, I've long settled into viewing things more on the basis of what I call "money to hassle ratio".

Mr E

22,694 posts

281 months

Friday 19th March 2021
quotequote all
Roger Irrelevant said:
I predict that this thread will very quickly turn into the Four Yorkshiremen.
Very much so.
But, I’m prepared to bet that many people work a 50 hour week pretty regularly, and not just in response to loading.

Burrow01

1,975 posts

214 months

Friday 19th March 2021
quotequote all
I have a lot of sympathy for them, as that's a crazy volume of work to be expected to do, and probably just managers on power trips or disorganised with short notice demands.

However its not a big secret that firms like this, Investment banks, big 4 consultancies etc use this "burn them out and discard" model, with the promise of future riches to entice people in.

What exactly did these graduates expect, with employer review sites like Glassdoor, they should be aware of how graduates are treated there

MC Bodge

27,310 posts

197 months

Friday 19th March 2021
quotequote all
I know somebody who is a corporate climber, goes the extra mile and all that. Senior in a major international company and has much more money than I do. On the rare occasions that I now meet them, they seem quite miserable.

Another person I know flogged their guts out for a company for years, long commute etc. was sacked/made redundant in a fairly unpleasant way. Now back to similarly flogging their guts out for another company, with an even longer commute. Not miserable, but somewhat obsessed.

I do wonder what makes them tick and what the point is for them.

untakenname

5,248 posts

214 months

Friday 19th March 2021
quotequote all
AngryYorkshireman said:
Most people can't work productively for those hours.
This, unless your paid commission for hitting targets or by the hour then it's foolish to work yourself into a grave for someone else.
One good thing about working from home (plus the advance of analytics in business) is that presentism is dying out as people can prove they are more productive working 30 hours a week than 60.


Dromedary66

1,924 posts

160 months

Friday 19th March 2021
quotequote all
MC Bodge said:
I do wonder what makes them tick and what the point is for them.
The absence of anything/anyone else in their life.

Boobonman

5,695 posts

214 months

Friday 19th March 2021
quotequote all
Dromedary66 said:
MC Bodge said:
I do wonder what makes them tick and what the point is for them.
The absence of anything/anyone else in their life.
Maybe just bills to pay? I'd rather work 37.5 hrs a week but I'd be earning in a month what I earn in a week flogging myself.

MC Bodge

27,310 posts

197 months

Friday 19th March 2021
quotequote all
Dromedary66 said:
MC Bodge said:
I do wonder what makes them tick and what the point is for them.
The absence of anything/anyone else in their life.
In one case, possibly. In the other case, not true.