Oh Yeah!!!
Oh Yeah!!!
Author
Discussion

nelly1

Original Poster:

5,660 posts

254 months

Wednesday 13th July 2005
quotequote all
Finally got the car back after its brief sojourn with Austec to sort out a few niggles (three loooooong weeks - bloody oil pressure sensor )

Among them was the re-alignment of the back wheels so they could get a 'proper' power curve out of it.

So here it is.....





and that was with month old fuel in the tank and 30 Deg air temp......not that I'm unhappy you understand!

>> Edited by nelly1 on Wednesday 13th July 20:16

chris watton

22,547 posts

283 months

Wednesday 13th July 2005
quotequote all
That is a very cool looking chart Nelly!! you must be chuffed to bits with that!
With that amount of power, is it any wonder we can't easily go back to V8s once bitten with the S6 bug!

TUS 373

5,038 posts

304 months

Wednesday 13th July 2005
quotequote all
127 mph is not much though!!

Had they fettled the engine/tuning or was this as it is 'out of the box'. 400+ bhp is not to be sneezed at...and look at that torque! Looking very good indeed.

nelly1

Original Poster:

5,660 posts

254 months

Wednesday 13th July 2005
quotequote all
Apart from a de-cat, de-cat chip and CCC's, that's it!

It's only 127mph 'cos it was taken in fourth gear without the close-ratio gearbox

>> Edited by nelly1 on Wednesday 13th July 22:35

whitey

2,508 posts

307 months

Thursday 14th July 2005
quotequote all
CR box 4 and 5 gear is same as standard.

I was supposed to have mine on the surrey Rolling Road tonight, but has been put back a few weeks. Then I can compare it to the Cerbera's that also went on the SRR.

Do you know if Austec's RR figures are about the same as the Surrey RR?

Certainly some good figures there!

cheers
Whitey

jellison

12,803 posts

300 months

Thursday 14th July 2005
quotequote all
Have heard Pauls rollers read a tad more than Surrey RR - but having no axe to grind, could not say which is right?

Does seem high to me when Std S is supposed to be 395bhp @ 7000 and only 310 ft/lbs @ 5250. But if slightly modded then good job.

www.carfolio.com/specifications/models/car/?car=88594

That torque is the SAME as the advertised Sargaris Torgue - which begs the question how can the 400bhp S engine that make 310 (or maybe slightly more) make 355 in the Sag!!!

Torque hard to get in high rev engines - pretty much proportionate to engine size - LS1/6 5.7 chevy's make 350 - 400 ft/lbs and these are 1.7 litre bigger, but similar power.

Heard that an F1 engine make 350ish ft/lbs and 900 - 950 bhp!

powerlord

771 posts

264 months

Thursday 14th July 2005
quotequote all
nellys was rebuild late last year to RR.

Mine was rebuilt in march (was a RR anyway).

Power told me that when the latest parts it will be pushing out sagaris power (405hp).*

I imagine nellys was the same.

stu

*actually they blueprinted mine too :-)

nelly1

Original Poster:

5,660 posts

254 months

Thursday 14th July 2005
quotequote all
Paul (Austec) did say the best he'd seen from an 'S' previously was 380bhp on the same rollers, so, all things being equal.......

There's a place near me with a R.R. and a good rep. for unbiased figures.
I've booked it in for next week, so we'll see what's what.

I do know that this one feels much quicker than the three I drove prior to buying it.

oh, and it was owned by a certain picky sod who used to post on here....J_S_G, so I've no doubt it's pretty near the mark

J_S_G v2.0

6,177 posts

273 months

Friday 15th July 2005
quotequote all
nelly1 said:
oh, and it was owned by a certain picky sod who used to post on here....J_S_G, so I've no doubt it's pretty near the mark

I'm still around, lurking.

You want to get it RRd when the ambient temp's noticeably lower - 30 degrees & then stuck inside on the rollers can't be helping those figures at all.

nelly1

Original Poster:

5,660 posts

254 months

Friday 15th July 2005
quotequote all
The fuel in the tank was a month old too..........

I'll have another figure from a local RR early next week. Watch this space......