996 TT question
Author
Discussion

sek

Original Poster:

40 posts

266 months

Saturday 16th July 2005
quotequote all
Have there been any important mechanical changes since the 996 TT came out (in 2000 I beleive). As far as I can tell, it seems that the answer is no, but I'd be interested to hear if that's wrong. Also, has the TT tip been a five speeder from day one?

Thanks

t urbo

218 posts

289 months

Saturday 16th July 2005
quotequote all
Late 2003 models had the tolerances changed in the front diff, apparently for the better but many of them now make a rattle noise at 1000-1800rpm in gears 5 and 6. They say that the noise is normal and fades with miles but mine hasnt. What OPC mean is 'don't worry you will get used to it in a year or so'!

>> Edited by t urbo on Saturday 16th July 11:22

robbom3

265 posts

254 months

Saturday 16th July 2005
quotequote all
There's the X50 upgrade. Don't think I'd class it as a mechanical change, it's actually an option. I don't think this was available on the early cars.

Roshambo

580 posts

274 months

Saturday 16th July 2005
quotequote all
Minor changes from its launch in 2000 until now.

A glovebox, rain sensitive wipers & auto dipping mirror were made standard in 2002 I believe.

I also believe that the software on the ECU was upgraded. I remember being told by a few tuners that the later cars are slightly smoother & that they use a different version of their tuning software depending on the year of the car, but nothing I guess that really matters or was advertised.

Ro.

roshambo

580 posts

274 months

Monday 18th July 2005
quotequote all
1000-1800rpm in 5th & 6th !!
My TT really doesn't like that gear at those revs !

Ro.

t urbo

218 posts

289 months

Monday 18th July 2005
quotequote all
roshambo,
All 996 tt's should be fine with pulling from as low as 800 rpm, yes thats right 800 rpm all the way to the redline.

Carrera2

8,352 posts

259 months

Monday 18th July 2005
quotequote all
Silly question (new to Porsches) but why's it called a TT - is it because of the twin turbo? Surely it's a bi-turbo though....?

silver993tt

9,064 posts

266 months

Monday 18th July 2005
quotequote all
In Germany it's referred to as a bi-turbo, in the US it's referred to as a twin turbo.

Carrera2

8,352 posts

259 months

Monday 18th July 2005
quotequote all
silver993tt said:
In Germany it's referred to as a bi-turbo, in the US it's referred to as a twin turbo.


I see - any ideas why we've adopted the yank variation?

In my mind a twin turbo has the two turbos in series, with one larger than the other to reduce lag, while a bi-turbo is literally just two identical turbos (one for each bank of the engine).

roshambo

580 posts

274 months

Monday 18th July 2005
quotequote all
Mine will do it, but it doesn't half complain while its doing it, a trait of turbocharged engines I thought.
I have had a couple of V6 engined cars & they happily pull from less than 1k revs in 6th without complaint, but my TT dont like it much.

Ro.

ColinC2

36 posts

256 months

Tuesday 19th July 2005
quotequote all
Carrera2 said:


I see - any ideas why we've adopted the yank variation?

In my mind a twin turbo has the two turbos in series, with one larger than the other to reduce lag, while a bi-turbo is literally just two identical turbos (one for each bank of the engine).



However correct it might be not quite the same is it ... a 996 BT ? :-) How reliable would that be?