Just when you thought the Daily Mail has peaked…

[anonymous-user]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9750993/D...


RFK murdered Marilyn Monroe with CIA supplied poison..

As you might guess , absolutely hee-haw proof or actual evidence lol.

[Trackdayer]

Strange indeed. Pretty harmless drivel though, compared to something like the Guardian that stirs up real hate and division over non-issues.

[HocusPocus]

Yawn!

Cannot even be bothered to read the article, but will leave the outraged bashers to get stuck into each other as their Saturday entertainment.

[grumbledoak]

Trackdayer said:

Strange indeed. Pretty harmless drivel though, compared to something like the Guardian that stirs up real hate and division over non-issues.

Answer in post 2. PH delivers again!

[Randy Winkman]

grumbledoak said:

Trackdayer said:

Strange indeed. Pretty harmless drivel though, compared to something like the Guardian that stirs up real hate and division over non-issues.

Answer in post 2. PH delivers again!

The Daily Mail "harmless"?

[zygalski]

grumbledoak said:

Trackdayer said:

Strange indeed. Pretty harmless drivel though, compared to something like the Guardian that stirs up real hate and division over non-issues.

Answer in post 2. PH delivers again!

Indeed.
Posted without a shred of irony too, I’ll bet.

[Trackdayer]

Randy Winkman said:

The Daily Mail "harmless"?

Many would argue It's on the right side of the culture war.

[grumbledoak]

Randy Winkman said:

The Daily Mail "harmless"?

They are all cheeks of the same arse. Anyone arguing any moral or intellectual superiority among these wastes of good toilet roll paper is only really declaring their own cretinism.

[TeaNoSugar]

Trackdayer said:

Strange indeed. Pretty harmless drivel though, compared to something like the Guardian that stirs up real hate and division over non-issues.

Top trolling.

Never heard the Daily Mail described as “harmless drivel” before. Drivel, certainly, but never preceded by “harmless”!

[valiant]

Trackdayer said:

Randy Winkman said:

The Daily Mail "harmless"?

Many would argue It's on the right side of the culture war.

We at war again?

Why don’t I get these memos?

[Vanden Saab]

valiant said:

Trackdayer said:

Randy Winkman said:

The Daily Mail "harmless"?

Many would argue It's on the right side of the culture war.

We at war again?

Why don’t I get these memos?

you have a lack of culture

[aparna]

I should refresh my memory of the Geneva convention, maybe the comments can be classed as a cyber weapon?

Edited by aparna on Saturday 3rd July 11:19

[TheJimi]

No-one else found the piece even a little bit intriguing?

[Red9zero]

Surprised they have column space for anything other than Diana at the moment.

[Exige77]

Red9zero said:

Surprised they have column space for anything other than Diana at the moment.

The internet has limitless space.

It doesn’t need to start a new edition when it gets to 500 stories

[Super Sonic]

Trackdayer said:

Randy Winkman said:

The Daily Mail "harmless"?

Many would argue It's on the right side of the culture war.

As opposed to the left side.

[LargeRed]

The Press are harmless. It's the BBC you have to watch out for .....

On Lady Di 60th bdaay, Harry and William were to attend the grand unveiling. NO the BBC made big announcements about watching their body behavior.

They are Royalty, not the Bash Street Kids !!

[Randy Winkman]

LargeRed said:

The Press are harmless. It's the BBC you have to watch out for .....

On Lady Di 60th bdaay, Harry and William were to attend the grand unveiling. NO the BBC made big announcements about watching their body behavior.

They are Royalty, not the Bash Street Kids !!

From the Daily Mail 2 days ago:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-9745697...

"Princess Diana statue unveiling: Expert examines body language of princes William and Harry"

[captain_cynic]

aparna said:

I should refresh my memory of the Geneva convention, maybe the comments can be classed as a cyber weapon?

Edited by aparna on Saturday 3rd July 11:19

According to the rules of comment engagement shots must not be directed with an intent to main...

So I'm not calling you a , I'm calling canteen a

[markcoznottz]

Mail might as well rebrand as ‘the royal’.