Cost cap and car damage
Cost cap and car damage
Author
Discussion

andygo

Original Poster:

7,150 posts

271 months

Monday 19th July 2021
quotequote all
With the current cost cap in place and reducing in years to come, in the light of the huge costs to repair cars after a big shunt, wouldn't it make sense for the car to be to be repaired without a cost cap being involved.

I'm not saying who's fault the Bottas/Russell crash or the Hamilton/Verstappen was, but it seems like an innocent(ish) party could be unfairly compromised on what are much tighter budgets. There could be put in place a limit on the cap waiver and an agreed damage lower limit by the scrutineers so wear and tear items cant be changed unless damaged beyond repair.

Just a thought and I'm sure there will be a few comments and ideas, not that the FIA will care, lol.

TheDeuce

28,905 posts

82 months

Monday 19th July 2021
quotequote all
Just another variable that the teams have to deal with, working within fixed resources.

It's the same for everyone of course.. In the end it's just another way in which luck can effect a teams campaign each season.

mw88

1,457 posts

127 months

Monday 19th July 2021
quotequote all
The teams will make a big fuss about the cost of damage, but they would have already spent money to produce spares regardless of crash damage.

I guess actual $$ spent, may depend on where parts are in their life cycle. Writing off brand new suspension or bodywork in a crash may mean they have to produce more later in the year, rather than stuff that would be scrapped after that race anyway.

They will already have spare chassis/tubs, suspension, bodywork, wheels etc that's been transported all over the world.

TheDeuce

28,905 posts

82 months

Monday 19th July 2021
quotequote all
Also bare in mind that the FIA are able at their discretion to agree extra budget allowance under special discretion - as yet the limit of such discretion had not been tested.

But don't be surprised if a lot of the noise from TP's about the high costs they suffer is at least part in preparation for a potential request for budget compensation down the line. For example, had the stewards decided blame was entirely on Lewis then Horner just might have started pushing the angle with the FIA to get a little extra £££

rdjohn

6,739 posts

211 months

Monday 19th July 2021
quotequote all
Should they be allocated extra cash for repairs? No! The budget cap probably only affect the top 5-teams.

The teams are racing last year’s tubs and substantially last years cars. Mercedes had 4 but lost one in Imola. I understood Toto’s grievance, but the rules are sensible. Doing that involves reallocating manufacturing resources away from next year’s car - the material cost is small, in comparison.

No doubt RB may need to build an extra tub, but half the season has now gone, so perhaps 1-extra will be sufficient.

thegreenhell

19,953 posts

235 months

Monday 19th July 2021
quotequote all
Smaller teams with budgets lower than the budget cap have been adversely affected by the cost of crash damage repairs for years. The big teams will just have to suck it up like the rest of them.

cholo

1,148 posts

251 months

Monday 19th July 2021
quotequote all
If they were worried about the cost of the damage, surely the answer would be for them to crash less?

andygo

Original Poster:

7,150 posts

271 months

Monday 19th July 2021
quotequote all
cholo said:
If they were worried about the cost of the damage, surely the answer would be for them to crash less?
What a great idea, lets tell them all not to crash - easier said than done at 180mph. It's like the reason why soldeirs go to war - it will never happen to them.

cholo

1,148 posts

251 months

Monday 19th July 2021
quotequote all
andygo said:
What a great idea, lets tell them all not to crash - easier said than done at 180mph. It's like the reason why soldeirs go to war - it will never happen to them.
As Toto said, it takes two to tango. Every driver knows that there is a chance that they could end up in the barrier when they stick a wheel in front on the corner, so surely they have to budget for that if they want to go racing? Any team who sets their yearly budget out based on no total losses are surely plain stupid?

tight fart

3,241 posts

289 months

Monday 19th July 2021
quotequote all
what about an Admiral multi car policy?

GadgeS3C

4,531 posts

180 months

Monday 19th July 2021
quotequote all
tight fart said:
what about an Admiral multi car policy?
Surely an Admiral Multi-21 car policy? wink

andygo

Original Poster:

7,150 posts

271 months

Monday 19th July 2021
quotequote all
cholo said:
As Toto said, it takes two to tango. Every driver knows that there is a chance that they could end up in the barrier when they stick a wheel in front on the corner, so surely they have to budget for that if they want to go racing? Any team who sets their yearly budget out based on no total losses are surely plain stupid?
On the other hand, they would be a bit stupid driving like miss Daisy and having a few mill unspent at the end of the season that they could have spent on development and can't carry forward to the next season..

And even if they drove like miss Daisy, there's still the issue of getting involved in someone else's accident.

saaby93

32,038 posts

194 months

Monday 19th July 2021
quotequote all
cholo said:
As Toto said, it takes two to tango. Every driver knows that there is a chance that they could end up in the barrier when they stick a wheel in front on the corner
or they cut across the front of someone?

Sandpit Steve

13,003 posts

90 months

Monday 19th July 2021
quotequote all
It’s part of racing, and in other series it’s usually the driver who pays the bill for accident damage. I wonder if F1 teams might get insurance against accidents, but the assessment process would be more difficult for prototype are made by the team themselves, rather than with cars from Dallara or Porsche.

Red Bull’s biggest worry this afternoon, is if they can get the restricted PU components out of that wreck in something approaching a serviceable condition. Sporting penalties are much worse than financial ones!

wibble cb

3,927 posts

223 months

Monday 19th July 2021
quotequote all
I have a ‘cock ups ‘ budget factored into my yearly plan, but we know that a big error out of left field, a bit like mr. Verstappen, can throw a v large spanner in those plans, we have to suck it up, same as they do.

james_TW

16,341 posts

213 months

Thursday 22nd July 2021
quotequote all
Idiot question here - If a car is totally destroyed and the team has used their allocated engine/gearbox, are they then penalised?

Sandpit Steve

13,003 posts

90 months

Thursday 22nd July 2021
quotequote all
james_TW said:
Idiot question here - If a car is totally destroyed and the team has used their allocated engine/gearbox, are they then penalised?
Short answer - yes.

They’re only allowed three engines during the season (and limited numbers of other PU components), if they use a fourth one they’re penalised, irrespective of the reasons why.

rdjohn

6,739 posts

211 months

Friday 23rd July 2021
quotequote all
I read that they get an extra £100k allowance for a retirement, so RB will have an extra £200k available to fix Max’s car after the “technical retirement” of Checo in the Sprint race.

Teddy Lop

8,301 posts

83 months

Friday 23rd July 2021
quotequote all
Nah, same with engine components too.

The problem you have is there's scope to take advantage from incidents where blame is never resolved and motives and never fully known. Probably moreso for PU I guess.

Cold

16,096 posts

106 months

Saturday 24th July 2021
quotequote all
Horner says the crash at Silverstone has cost RB $1.8m.

https://www.reuters.com/lifestyle/sports/verstappe...