Charlie and the Chocolate Factory
Charlie and the Chocolate Factory
Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

83 months

Wednesday 20th July 2005
quotequote all
[redacted]

pdV6

16,442 posts

290 months

Wednesday 20th July 2005
quotequote all
Thought this was going to be holiday tales from Vixpy...

Chim_Knee

12,689 posts

286 months

Wednesday 20th July 2005
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Cinemas have to be like that mate, otherwise you wouldn't be able to see the screen. Don't worry too much - just hold Anna's hand and you'll be fine.

HTH.

mrs_knee

342 posts

280 months

Wednesday 20th July 2005
quotequote all
I thought that this was going to be a rude thread seeing as it was started by you

edited because I had written a load of drivel!

>> Edited by mrs_knee on Wednesday 20th July 16:17

pdV6

16,442 posts

290 months

Wednesday 20th July 2005
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]

Just so long as its 70% cocoa, or else it'll have to be renamed the "Chocolate flavour factory"

JagLover

46,758 posts

264 months

Wednesday 20th July 2005
quotequote all
pdV6 said:
Thought this was going to be holiday tales from Vixpy...




jimothy

5,151 posts

266 months

Wednesday 20th July 2005
quotequote all
Lets be honest, how many bad Tim Burton films are there?

Still think the original suggestion of Marilyn Manson as Willie Wonka would have been interesting...

vixpy1 on tour

42,699 posts

293 months

Wednesday 20th July 2005
quotequote all
JagLover said:

pdV6 said:
Thought this was going to be holiday tales from Vixpy...







I thought it was about a Gay Drug dealer.

pdV6

16,442 posts

290 months

Wednesday 20th July 2005
quotequote all
los angeles said:
I could have done without the silly song and dance numbers from the Oompah-Loompahs... There's a non-Roald Dahl psychology back story inserted ...which to mind is a waste of time and against the spirit of the book.

If talking about the "spirit" of the book, surely the OL songs are a pre-requisite of the film, as they give the moral lessons throughout?

Coco H

4,237 posts

266 months

Wednesday 20th July 2005
quotequote all
You have to have the disturbing O-L songs in - the book is a bit well weird (but good)

Depp is at least more visually appealing than the last WW

Does the film cross the divide and become one of those for both children and adults?

gooby

9,269 posts

263 months

Wednesday 20th July 2005
quotequote all
jimothy said:
Lets be honest, how many bad Tim Burton films are there?

:


How shallow is the sea?

Most Burton films would be greatly improved by actually having a story. There are some exeptions (Very few) but generally cack.

Before anyone replies... Batman

mastiff

2,515 posts

270 months

Wednesday 20th July 2005
quotequote all
In the original film, the first shot of Gene Wilder showed him with a limp, resting on a cane. He then throws away the cane and performs a forward roll/somersault movement. According to Gene Wilder, this was an attempt to show the "darker" side of Willy Wonka, in that he couldn't always be trusted.

There is a slightly dark side to most of Roald Dahl's work.

I am looking forward to this version, as a child it was one of my favourites.

JonRB

80,041 posts

301 months

Friday 29th July 2005
quotequote all
I'm seeing it this afternoon with my wife and son.

I'm quite looking forward to it as I'm a fan of Tim Burton's work and also rate Johnny Depp.