Didn't know an MD-80 could do this
Discussion
I used to fly every week (monday and friday) in MD80s in the US when I lived there around the end of the last century. I liked them as they really seemed to have more 'get up and go' than the other tin I flew on. Also on the times I was lucky to be in rows 1-5 them became lovely and quiet as they accelerated and you couldn't hear the engine noise any more.
They also had a good trick of using reverse thrust to 'self push back' from the gates on some days. Which always started with rolling forward a few feet before the PiC stuck her in reverse and floored her! I guess this was to unstick the wheels/brakes.
They also had a good trick of using reverse thrust to 'self push back' from the gates on some days. Which always started with rolling forward a few feet before the PiC stuck her in reverse and floored her! I guess this was to unstick the wheels/brakes.
A TU-154 stuffed full of holiday makers doesn't do a bad job either!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1uWFfOO0V8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1uWFfOO0V8
Having flown the DC-9, the junior size, it is clear to me the crew didn't use the standard profile for departure. Did anyone notice how the gear was retracted very early, the altitude over the runway remains nearly constant as it accelerates and then it goes into a steep climb which is unsustainable. They were trading airspeed for altitude. Noise abatement profiles are typically done at V2 (which guarantees minimum single engine climb gradient) to a specified altitude.
Swift93 said:
Having flown the DC-9, the junior size, it is clear to me the crew didn't use the standard profile for departure. Did anyone notice how the gear was retracted very early, the altitude over the runway remains nearly constant as it accelerates and then it goes into a steep climb which is unsustainable. They were trading airspeed for altitude. Noise abatement profiles are typically done at V2 (which guarantees minimum single engine climb gradient) to a specified altitude.
As I read it, Nassau doesn't have any departure noise abatement procedures, so I guess the crew call it as they see it, subject to any ATC constraints.MarkwG said:
As I read it, Nassau doesn't have any departure noise abatement procedures, so I guess the crew call it as they see it, subject to any ATC constraints.
My airline required a standard profile for all departures, V2 to 1000AGL at which point the VNAV (B737NG) would move the bug to a normal climb profile, 250 IAS to 10,000'.Swift93 said:
MarkwG said:
As I read it, Nassau doesn't have any departure noise abatement procedures, so I guess the crew call it as they see it, subject to any ATC constraints.
My airline required a standard profile for all departures, V2 to 1000AGL at which point the VNAV (B737NG) would move the bug to a normal climb profile, 250 IAS to 10,000'.Gassing Station | Boats, Planes & Trains | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff





