10 Green Godesses....
Author
Discussion

windsorphil

Original Poster:

888 posts

285 months

Monday 14th October 2002
quotequote all
Was not surprised to see the local barracks filling up their Green Godesses at my local shell station today, apparently they are being deployed in London - have I missed something about the firefighters pay dispute? Is there an official strike date?

Anyway, support our firemen - it's outrageous that an underground train driver makes 10 grand a year more than a fireman!

edited because I can't spell!
Phil

>>> Edited by windsorphil on Monday 14th October 17:31

NoisyGriff

579 posts

291 months

Monday 14th October 2002
quotequote all
I work where the GG drivers are being trained. There are 850 cabs and they were all built around 1953.

That makes them very old.

And very slow.

I hate them. All the roads round here are gridlocked at no more than 40.

Be afraid... very afraid - they're on their way to a road near you soon.

Ballistic Banana

14,704 posts

290 months

Monday 14th October 2002
quotequote all
:tryingnottoseemlikearighttwat:

Whats a bloody Green Godess when its at home.

BB

dennisthemenace

15,605 posts

291 months

Monday 14th October 2002
quotequote all
A gert fire engine used by the army i think ?????

BLUETHUNDER

7,881 posts

283 months

Monday 14th October 2002
quotequote all
A converted bedford RL army truck from the fifties and sixties, its got a better pump rate than a civie fire truck 2000 gals a minute compared with 650 gals of the fire brigades models,just another bit of useless information

FourWheelDrift

91,843 posts

307 months

Monday 14th October 2002
quotequote all
Talking of strikes.

Are tube drivers paid more than London Bus drivers? If so it's shocking. Last strike I used the buses and couldn't believe the ammount of stress some of them have to put with yet still remain calm and very observant to all traffic, particularly cyclists. Plus they have to deal directly with passengers.

Tube drivers just have to stop at every station, go when green and shout "stand clear of the doors" at every station. Simple - doesn't deserve to paid more.

NoisyGriff

579 posts

291 months

Monday 14th October 2002
quotequote all

...its got a better pump rate than a civie fire truck 2000 gals a minute compared with 650 gals of the fire brigades models.


How and why do you know this?

Ballistic Banana

14,704 posts

290 months

Monday 14th October 2002
quotequote all
Hey cheers for that u dont ask u dont get.
So not quite useless info Thunder

BB

JohnL

1,763 posts

288 months

Monday 14th October 2002
quotequote all

Anyway, support our firemen - it's outrageous that an underground train driver makes 10 grand a year more than a fireman!


That just means that tube drivers are overpaid, not that firemen are underpaid.

What firemen are asking for is £30k starting salary after training, ie a school leaver plus six months' training. And then move on up from there of course with experience. Plus a London weighting if appropriate. What do all you graduates out there think about that?

There are loads and loads of "deserving" jobs that attract public sympathy - but you can't run a country on the basis that firemen/nurses/teachers/whateverelseisflavourofthemonth are heroes so they should be paid whatever they care to ask for.

Interesting that of that off the cuff list, firemen have the shortest training and joint lowest entry qualifications, make arguably the least contribution to the country (expecting to be shot at for that one ), yet are asking for the most pay.

Leadfoot

1,910 posts

304 months

Monday 14th October 2002
quotequote all

FourWheelDrift said: Talking of strikes.

Are tube drivers paid more than London Bus drivers? If so it's shocking. Last strike I used the buses and couldn't believe the ammount of stress some of them have to put with yet still remain calm and very observant to all traffic, particularly cyclists. Plus they have to deal directly with passengers.

Tube drivers just have to stop at every station, go when green and shout "stand clear of the doors" at every station. Simple - doesn't deserve to paid more.

was on telly t'other night. Tube driver = 31k, bus driver = 16k.

miniman

29,317 posts

285 months

Tuesday 15th October 2002
quotequote all

What do all you graduates out there think about that?



I'm not a graduate myself, but the other half has a first class degree and a PhD in Microbiology, Virology and HIV research, and has struggled for months to get a job in her field - finally got one with starting salary of £21k.

I think that this kind of work is just as important as putting out fires - its this kind of person who is coming up with cures for Cancer etc and sooner or later a lot us us on here (1 in 3) will be glad of that. They should get paid properly!

God damn it! An extra 9k per year would be just right for buying a TVR!!

dan

1,068 posts

307 months

Tuesday 15th October 2002
quotequote all
Just to play devils advocate, how many graduates will walk into a burning building they know is on the verge of collapse to try to save someone who by all accounts is likely to be already dead.

... just a thought.

Ali_D

1,115 posts

307 months

Tuesday 15th October 2002
quotequote all
I haven't heard any thing about the strike but one of my mates in the army has just been recalled from a posting in Canada (guarding us from polar bears!) to train as a fire fighter.

I always fancied being a fireman, a bit more job satisfaction than sitting behind a desk all day playing with numbers.

superlightr

12,920 posts

286 months

Tuesday 15th October 2002
quotequote all
Why cant the army/firemen use the normal fire trucks instead of the old green goddesess?

Can they not train on them as the firemen have them all?

windsorphil

Original Poster:

888 posts

285 months

Tuesday 15th October 2002
quotequote all

miniman said:I'm not a graduate myself, but the other half has a first class degree and a PhD in Microbiology, Virology and HIV research, and has struggled for months to get a job in her field - finally got one with starting salary of £21k.

I think that this kind of work is just as important as putting out fires - its this kind of person who is coming up with cures for Cancer etc and sooner or later a lot us us on here (1 in 3) will be glad of that. They should get paid properly!

God damn it! An extra 9k per year would be just right for buying a TVR!!



I too have spent a lifetime in life sciences, however the risks associated are much less than those faced by firefighters, and also there is greater opportunity for scientists to make fortunes in industry - I am not sure if there are such opportunities for firefighters.
I do agree that starting salaries in science are low, but I know a great deal of scientists earning £100,000k or more after 10-15 years in the industry (let alone those who do develop breakthrough technologies who often become multi-millionaires)-not sure how many six-figure firefighters there are.

911newbie

611 posts

283 months

Tuesday 15th October 2002
quotequote all
Ohhh ... sorry I normally just lurk on these forums but I have got to reply to Windsorphil's last post.

I work in 'science' and always have done (well, since I got my first job anyway). I know of no one, absolutely no one working in science that is in it for the money. Smart people don't join science if they want to get rich (lawyers or business etc instead). Most scientists in this country work in academia in unviersities, like myself, and we are payed very little. Typical starting salary for someone with a degree, masters, PhD and upto 6 years post doctoral experience is about £19k - 20k. I've been working in universities for 7 years now (degree & PhD & 6 years post doc experience & 3 years lecturer experience) and am on much less than £30k. 11 Years in University education before my first permanent job. Industry, at least in the UK, is not much different in either salaries or contract terms in my experience. The US is quite different and yes industrial scientists may earn £100k plus, but very rarely in Europe.

The UK has a long histroy in Science and Engineering and it was upon this base that our present industrial high living standards are based. If we devalue it and refuse to pay our scientists properly (University and Industrial) we will lose this technology advantage, as we have begun to do. Its then we can look forward to either servicing other richer countries or sliding backwards in relative living standards.

It is very difficult to compare professions, eg fireman and scientist. You may not find many scientist willing to run into burning buildings etc but equally you will not find many firemen with the knowledge skills and insight required to tackle the problems that science does.
Horse for courses, and all equally valid.

I do however find it disturbing that some professions are able to extort such seemingly massive salaries, far beyond other similar professions. Basically the train drivers had the operators by the short and curlies because they got rid of so many of them when privatised. Serves them right really, I have little sympathy with the greedy train operators.

Right, sorry bout that, rant over.
cheers

windsorphil

Original Poster:

888 posts

285 months

Tuesday 15th October 2002
quotequote all
Newbie,

You're quite right that those in academia are less well paid - I moved into the commercial world after four years of academic research.
However most universities and in particular Oxford, Cambridge, Surrey, Reading etc have spin out companies that are generating wealth for Professors and Researchers, many have their own venture capital fund too.
Six figure salaries are increasingly common in the Pharma and CRO industry and especially in the related software and technology sectors.

Still I value firefighters more than underground drivers...

Edited because I thought of something else...

>> Edited by windsorphil on Tuesday 15th October 10:54

>> Edited by windsorphil on Tuesday 15th October 11:07

nigelbasson

533 posts

289 months

Tuesday 15th October 2002
quotequote all
I have a mate who is in the Marines and currently the majority of his unit are being prepared to cover the fire service. A lot of them are being sent up to Hull to complete their driving licences required and others are being sent for fire safety training. Therefore this may suggest it's not if the firefighters strike but rather when.

miniman

29,317 posts

285 months

Tuesday 15th October 2002
quotequote all

windsorphil said:
Still I value firefighters more than underground drivers...



I agree entirely - I probably didn't make my point the way I thought it! I think the biggest problem is the difference between skilled, trained people like nurses, firefighters, doctors, scientists etc. and those who do an important job like train driving.

The point is not that train drivers are worth 30k, it is that if they are, then so are nurses etc.

neil_cardiff

17,113 posts

287 months

Tuesday 15th October 2002
quotequote all

superlightr said: Why cant the army/firemen use the normal fire trucks instead of the old green goddesess?

Can they not train on them as the firemen have them all?


It is because the civvie Fire Engines are council owned and the army are not allowed to touch them.

Just to add my bit - I can't that one of my best mates has to risk his life for such a crap amount of money. Give em the raise I say...