Cam guru required
Cam guru required
Author
Discussion

hoofa

Original Poster:

3,153 posts

225 months

Thursday 4th November 2021
quotequote all
Gents here is a cam spec, what kind of cam is it , mild, sporty ? , any ideas as I am not a cam expert [, it’s a roller cam but not sure what to compare it too. url]|https://thumbsnap.com/udDzAzL4[/url]

Edited by hoofa on Thursday 4th November 19:06

Boosted LS1

21,200 posts

277 months

Thursday 4th November 2021
quotequote all
I think that's pretty sporty. Plenty of lift, early intake opening . Uses 1.6 rockers to help with the extra lift.

Edited by Boosted LS1 on Saturday 6th November 22:30

hoofa

Original Poster:

3,153 posts

225 months

Friday 5th November 2021
quotequote all
I see the pc police have visted !!! Why do I bother with pistonheads

spitfire4v8

4,018 posts

198 months

Friday 5th November 2021
quotequote all
didnt simon reply ? was something else taken down ?

i started writing a lengthy piece but im not a cam guy so thought my mumblings would be of little use as none of it was really based on factual evidence.

Boosted LS1

21,200 posts

277 months

Friday 5th November 2021
quotequote all
There was a reply by Zener. He said it wasn't an oof ters cam lol and it isn't. The naughty boy, lol.

hoofa

Original Poster:

3,153 posts

225 months

Friday 5th November 2021
quotequote all
spitfire4v8 said:
didnt simon reply ? was something else taken down ?

i started writing a lengthy piece but im not a cam guy so thought my mumblings would be of little use as none of it was really based on factual evidence.
Jules your comments are more than welcome

rev-erend

21,587 posts

301 months

Saturday 6th November 2021
quotequote all
The link below may be useful..

http://www.wolfitt.com/kentcamdata.htm

Boosted LS1

21,200 posts

277 months

Saturday 6th November 2021
quotequote all
OP has 13.81 mm of lift (more then any of the kent cams) so it's racey imo plus it's a roller cam so will have fast ramp rates and more duration at peak lift then a conventional cam.

spitfire4v8

4,018 posts

198 months

Saturday 6th November 2021
quotequote all
I'm not into cams as such and haven't done any back to back testing with them, because with cam in block engines it's just too much of an effort, but I was going to say that historically people have run a narrow lsa to improve the midrange but cams like that tend to fall off after peak power quickly. A wider lsa helps spread the power out over a wider rev band, but might ultimately make less peak midrange.

Also because of the nature of your install (centrifugal supercharger) you have an inlet port which is effectively seeing higher flows than normally aspirated with rising revs. On overlap this pushes some of the fresh charge straight through the exhaust port..

the upshot is that if you are chasing the numbers then i would definitely go with a wider lsa than you have now. If it were my engine and I was starting from a blank sheet regarding cams (you have a minority install, you're the only person i know with exactly that spec) I would go for something over 115deg lsa .. and to be honest I'd probably push for something like 120. Because you have a roller cam the manufacturer has presumably pushed for very rapid opening and closing actions (otherwise why use one?) so with a tight LSA you will have a lot of lift on overlap, so spreading the lsa would be surely the first priority ?

But as I say .. i'm not big into cams and typically use the accepted industry standard cams for normally aspirated engines .. centrifugal chargers is something i know little about, I'm just telling it as if i were building your engine.

Boosted LS1

21,200 posts

277 months

Saturday 6th November 2021
quotequote all
That cam's going to make a lot of numbers with a centri due to there being virtually no overlap. The valve lift helps fill the cylinders as does the duration so it can run a lesser boost threshold. It'll be mega :-)

Check piston to valve clearances, use a solid lifter.