This makes me sad.
Author
Discussion

james-witton

Original Poster:

1,363 posts

130 months

Wednesday 10th November 2021
quotequote all
I have spent my career in HR (not the most popular job) because I really do believe that people are the essential part of any organisation. I passionately believe in the right person for the job, regardless of age, sex, race etc.
But when I see this it makes feel sad, and, as a white man, somewhat discriminated against. This isn’t some ‘anti-woke’ or hidden bigotry post. But I can’t help who I am, so why would it be harder for me to get a job with this firm than others of a different sex or race?


Zarco

20,268 posts

232 months

Wednesday 10th November 2021
quotequote all
Nice nails.

JuanCarlosFandango

9,556 posts

94 months

Wednesday 10th November 2021
quotequote all
Waiting for the wokemon to come along and explain how hiring people based on skin colour isn't racist. So long as you choose the right skin colour.

Johnnytheboy

24,499 posts

209 months

Wednesday 10th November 2021
quotequote all
In the UK, it would be interesting to ignore this policy, get sacked, then take your former employer to a tribunal.

barryrs

4,955 posts

246 months

Wednesday 10th November 2021
quotequote all
Zarco said:
Nice nails.
Looks like James is the ideal demographic smile

Zarco

20,268 posts

232 months

Wednesday 10th November 2021
quotequote all
barryrs said:
Zarco said:
Nice nails.
Looks like James is the ideal demographic smile
If you can't beat 'em.

BabySharkDooDooDooDooDooDoo

15,078 posts

192 months

Wednesday 10th November 2021
quotequote all
Has happened in the U.K. for a while in one way or another. The wonderful term “positive discrimination” was used to explain it’s ok.



bigandclever

14,215 posts

261 months

Wednesday 10th November 2021
quotequote all
It’s not even about hiring, it’s about interviewing.

DaveCWK

2,302 posts

197 months

Wednesday 10th November 2021
quotequote all
Question is, how can the innocent Generic White Man appropriately categorise himself so he isn't discriminated against?
It's not possible to become a woman or change skin colour, but some other ideas:

- state you are of Romany/Gypsy heritage - believe this is often a separate ethnicity tick box & is unverifiable.
- lie about sexuality? Again, unverifiable.

TonyRPH

13,472 posts

191 months

Wednesday 10th November 2021
quotequote all
This happened in South Africa back in the 90's.

It was known as 'affirmative action'.

Now, in a country that has a predominantly non white population, this was accepted (and expected with the abolition of apartheid) - but in a country that has a predominantly white population?

EDIT: Just to be clear - I believe that a person should be employed based on their skills and suitability for the role, and race should not come into it at all.




Edited by TonyRPH on Wednesday 10th November 22:19

Dr Murdoch

3,903 posts

158 months

Wednesday 10th November 2021
quotequote all
Zarco said:
Nice nails.
He's got nipples like bullets

rodericb

8,521 posts

149 months

Wednesday 10th November 2021
quotequote all
bigandclever said:
It’s not even about hiring, it’s about interviewing.
They can still hire white men but have to demonstrate that they've interviewed other demographics. But there's the greater target of tripling the numbers of female and minority folk in senior roles by 2023. I have a suspicion that anyone playing funny with the process and not doing their bit for that 2023 will find themselves forfeiting bonuses, or on the way out...

Countdown

47,362 posts

219 months

Wednesday 10th November 2021
quotequote all
Johnnytheboy said:
In the UK, it would be interesting to ignore this policy, get sacked, then take your former employer to a tribunal.
They won't be sacked, they'll get a lower bonus.

Maybe what will happen is that all the high-performing hiring managers will move to an organisation that recruits purely on a merit basis and "woke" organisations such as this one will go broke because they've not been recruiting the best person for the job.... so really they're only hurting themselves.

Ivo Shandor

53,012 posts

206 months

Wednesday 10th November 2021
quotequote all
Johnnytheboy said:
In the UK, it would be interesting to ignore this policy, get sacked, then take your former employer to a tribunal.
There was a case sort of similar to this in Cheshire when the best candidate for Cheshire constabulary was ignored in favour of an ethnic minority.

Ivan stewart

2,792 posts

59 months

Wednesday 10th November 2021
quotequote all
I bet the Chinese and the Russians are doing this too!!!

Terminator X

19,567 posts

227 months

Thursday 11th November 2021
quotequote all
As part of my old job I was in charge of recruitment for the sector I worked in. We always recruited our view of the right person for the job and I certainly could not give 2 fks about either the colour of their skin or their sex gender. I'd be amazed if anyone other than a small minded minority cares about it either.

Makes a good headline though and winds us all up.

TX.

anonymous-user

77 months

Thursday 11th November 2021
quotequote all
Ivan stewart said:
I bet the Chinese and the Russians are doing this too!!!
And the Indians - try getting a well-paid office job in Delhi or Mumbai if you're a muslim.

Eric Mc

124,794 posts

288 months

Thursday 11th November 2021
quotequote all
Which newspaper is this and which banks are applying this policy?

StevieBee

14,851 posts

278 months

Thursday 11th November 2021
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Which newspaper is this and which banks are applying this policy?
I think I know why you asked that question and was thinking the same myself. But it does indeed appear to be a legit story. The article appeared in CityAM and also The Times. It relates to the bank State Street (no, me neither!) who have since denied the policy.

otolith

65,515 posts

227 months

Thursday 11th November 2021
quotequote all
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2021/11/07/in...

"State Street said it required managers to demonstrate they had interviewed female and ethnic minority candidates and that executives’ bonuses are tied to whether they had met targets to boost recruitment of minority staff. "

"But a spokesman dismissed a report in The Sunday Times that hiring white men would require approval. It added that appointments could be challenged to address the risk of bias and also signalled it expects hiring managers to produce diverse shortlists of candidates. Recruiters must put together a panel including at least one woman and one person of colour, it said."

"The company is the latest to link executive pay to diversity targets. Santander said recently that bankers would get bigger bonuses for hiring more women and minorities, as well as demonstrating progress on climate change. "

"The Financial Conduct Authority and Prudential Regulation Authority have said they could force companies to link bonuses to diversity targets, saying progress in the area needs to be sped up."