3 months notice - IT jobs
Discussion
I've received an offer today from a company for the role of Senior SQL Database Developer.
Having browsed the agreement/terms I noted they have put in a 3-month notice clause.
Sure, that could be considered normal these days but in the fast-paced world of tech, I'm concerned it may put future employers off as tech companies usually want their new recruits to start asap - 3 months could be too long?
If I accept, this will be the longest notice period I've agreed to - I was thinking of getting them to compromise to six weeks.
Any thoughts or experiences are welcome.
Having browsed the agreement/terms I noted they have put in a 3-month notice clause.
Sure, that could be considered normal these days but in the fast-paced world of tech, I'm concerned it may put future employers off as tech companies usually want their new recruits to start asap - 3 months could be too long?
If I accept, this will be the longest notice period I've agreed to - I was thinking of getting them to compromise to six weeks.
Any thoughts or experiences are welcome.

It's normal for senior roles. Also it's not set in concrete - you can normally negotiate it downwards (nobody wants to employ somebody who would rather not be there). And finally any prospective new Employer will normally be aware that people are on 3 month contracts and will be willing to wait for the right person.
Abdul Abulbul Amir said:
And they work both ways. Earlier this year I was made redundant from a job 2 weeks after completing my probation period and moving from one month to three months notice. Very nice
Mine doesn't. I have to give 3 months notice, they only have to give me 1 month. 
towser44 said:
Abdul Abulbul Amir said:
And they work both ways. Earlier this year I was made redundant from a job 2 weeks after completing my probation period and moving from one month to three months notice. Very nice
Mine doesn't. I have to give 3 months notice, they only have to give me 1 month. 
t. When it works both ways it can be a benefit. We went through multiple rounds of redundancies and anyone that was at risk was sent on gardening leave. Once they were confirmed they continued to be paid for 3 months. That's a nice buffer to find another job.towser44 said:
Abdul Abulbul Amir said:
And they work both ways. Earlier this year I was made redundant from a job 2 weeks after completing my probation period and moving from one month to three months notice. Very nice
Mine doesn't. I have to give 3 months notice, they only have to give me 1 month. 
As has been said, three months is common for more senior roles, and as a result anyone else will be prepared (and expect) to wait if they want you in future. It’s also good in case of redundancy, given that you won’t have built up any service to count towards a pay out.
If you want to leave in a hurry you can always request a shorter exit period at that point in time. Just remember that they don’t have to say yes, so you’ll need to be prepared to work a three month notice if it comes to it.
If you want to leave in a hurry you can always request a shorter exit period at that point in time. Just remember that they don’t have to say yes, so you’ll need to be prepared to work a three month notice if it comes to it.
Gassing Station | Jobs & Employment Matters | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



very good!