Jamie Wallis - Bridgend MP
Author
Discussion

ClaphamGT3

Original Poster:

12,034 posts

266 months

Sunday 19th December 2021
quotequote all
And the hits just keep on coming for Boris Johnson;

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-59712424

I think I speak for all genuine Tories when I say we'll be only too pleased to see the back of this 'delightful' character but I can't see the inevitable by election going well for Johnson

Cotty

41,887 posts

307 months

Sunday 19th December 2021
quotequote all
Driving whilst unfit? Do they mean he was drunk or just a fat bd.

Gecko1978

12,302 posts

180 months

Sunday 19th December 2021
quotequote all
Why not charged beeathlizer and your done surely. Or I'd he refusing to give a sample cos he has covid will claim he was protecting others from infection and police will then drop charge.....

bitchstewie

64,261 posts

233 months

Sunday 19th December 2021
quotequote all
BBC Article said:
A message on Mr Wallis's Facebook page said a planned surgery with constituents on Saturday had to be postponed until the New Year as he had tested positive for Covid.
Could that be the definition of "unfit" if he was meant to be isolating?

Another one with some interesting sidelines.

Jamie Wallis: Bridgend MP 'misled press' over sugar daddy site

biggbn

30,190 posts

243 months

Sunday 19th December 2021
quotequote all
Sounds like a lovely fella, must fit right in in the House of Commons....

gareth_r

6,560 posts

260 months

Sunday 19th December 2021
quotequote all
CPS - https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/road-traffic...


Section 4 RTA 1988 - Driving/Attempting to drive or being in charge of a motor vehicle whilst unfit
Under s.4(1) RTA 1988, it is an offence if a person drives or attempts to drive a motor vehicle on a road or other public place whilst unfit through drink or drugs. Similarly, s.4(2) RTA 1988 makes it an offence if the person is in charge of a motor vehicle when under the influence of drink or drugs.
It is important to note the interplay between s.4 RTA 1988 and s. 5A RTA 1998 (Driving or being in charge with concentration of alcohol/specified controlled drug above specified limit). Where the level of drugs exceeds the specified amount, the appropriate charge would be s. 5A RTA 1988. If the level of the drug does not exceed the specified limit, but where there is sufficient evidence of impairment, the charge will be contrary to s.4 RTA 1988.

DeejRC

8,731 posts

105 months

Sunday 19th December 2021
quotequote all
Im amused at the sugar daddy thing smile

anonymous-user

77 months

Sunday 19th December 2021
quotequote all
Jesus Christ what an absolute scumbag.

bitchstewie

64,261 posts

233 months

Sunday 19th December 2021
quotequote all
I thought we wanted MP's with real-world experience of business hehe


anonymous-user

77 months

Sunday 19th December 2021
quotequote all
South Wales’s answer to Jeffery Epstein

DeejRC

8,731 posts

105 months

Sunday 19th December 2021
quotequote all
So...did he run the Sugar Daddy company or was he offering himself as a Sugar Daddy? And no, Im not clicking on any random links smile

bitchstewie

64,261 posts

233 months

Sunday 19th December 2021
quotequote all
Read the BBC article and follow the link about half way down to Buzzfeed.

Quite safe smile

DeejRC

8,731 posts

105 months

Sunday 19th December 2021
quotequote all
Disappointing frown
I was really hoping he was being offered as one of the sugar daddies on the website.

As to the website and business itself, shrug, doesn't bother me at all, apart from the bks of having thousands of businessmen clients on the books.
The Western Mail used to run this sort of stuff in print back when I lived in Wales. Ive known plenty of girls put themselves thru uni that way.