Weapons you've never heard of
Weapons you've never heard of
Author
Discussion

BrettMRC

Original Poster:

5,558 posts

183 months

Monday 24th January 2022
quotequote all
This was a new one on me!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIM-26_Falcon

Nuclear A2A in service. (Almost used during Cuban missile crisis)


Simpo Two

91,327 posts

288 months

Monday 24th January 2022
quotequote all
A nuclear bomb to bring down an aeroplane seems a bit excessive!

Eric Mc

124,791 posts

288 months

Monday 24th January 2022
quotequote all
Are you referring to the Hughes Genie missile? (I didn't open the link). It wasn't designed to shoot down a single aeroplane. It was designed to shoot down the expected hoards of Soviet bombers as they crossed the Bering Straights on their way to drop atom bombs on US targets.

By the end of the 1950s this attack scenario was fading as ICBMs began to take over as the main offensive nuclear system.


Shar2

2,257 posts

236 months

Monday 24th January 2022
quotequote all
Eric, the AIM-26 was an updated Falcon missile fitted with a nuclear warhead, unlike the Genie, the Falcon was a guided missile.

Eric Mc

124,791 posts

288 months

Monday 24th January 2022
quotequote all
The Genie was even scarier if it was unguided.

I'm surprised the US didn't try nuclear hand grenades.

AlexIT

1,685 posts

161 months

Monday 24th January 2022
quotequote all
Having read that in 50s the Americans planned to use nuclear bombs to make way for the Interstate 40, it doesn't come as a surprise they also developed a use as AA missiles.

Did they also plan to sell them for personal defence?

Project Plowshare

GT03ROB

13,988 posts

244 months

Monday 24th January 2022
quotequote all
Over here there have been a number of nuclear explosions used to support various infrastructure projects. Surprisingly recently as well. If you are interested look up Lira.

Shar2

2,257 posts

236 months

Monday 24th January 2022
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
The Genie was even scarier if it was unguided.

I'm surprised the US didn't try nuclear hand grenades.
I think they would have done if they could. They did make the Davy Crockett nuclear mortar bomb though.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davy_Crockett_(nucle...


Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

284 months

Monday 24th January 2022
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
The Genie was even scarier if it was unguided.

I'm surprised the US didn't try nuclear hand grenades.
Genie being tested

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1VZ7FQHTaR4

RizzoTheRat

28,082 posts

215 months

Monday 24th January 2022
quotequote all
The Russian 200 knot nuclear torpedo's are quite a scary idea too. Fire it roughly in the direction of the enemy contact and hope your fancy titanium hull is strong enough to survive the shock.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VA-111_Shkval


Edited by RizzoTheRat on Monday 24th January 12:00

46and2

834 posts

56 months

Monday 24th January 2022
quotequote all
The Genie would have been one of the safer nuclear weapons for the general population as the fallout generated would have been minimal.

Eric Mc

124,791 posts

288 months

Monday 24th January 2022
quotequote all
Shar2 said:
I think they would have done if they could. They did make the Davy Crockett nuclear mortar bomb though.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davy_Crockett_(nucle...

I think keeping your head down when firing that thing was pretty essential eek

BrettMRC

Original Poster:

5,558 posts

183 months

Monday 24th January 2022
quotequote all
RizzoTheRat said:
The Russian 200 knot nuclear torpedo's are quite a scary idea too. Fire it roughly in the direction of the enemy contact and hope your fancy titanium hull is strong enough to survive the shock.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VA-111_Shkval


Edited by RizzoTheRat on Monday 24th January 12:00
Especially given the limited range of the early ones!

Equus

16,980 posts

124 months

Monday 24th January 2022
quotequote all
RizzoTheRat said:
The Russian 200 knot nuclear torpedo's are quite a scary idea too. Fire it roughly in the direction of the enemy contact and hope your fancy titanium hull is strong enough to survive the shock.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VA-111_Shkval
Wikipedia said:
Some reports indicate that the VA-111 possibly exceeds speeds of 250 kn (460 km/h; 290 mph), and that work on a 300 kn (560 km/h; 350 mph) version was underway.
If you strapped a man in place of the warhead, that would be fast enough to take the World Water Speed Record. yikes

Simpo Two

91,327 posts

288 months

Monday 24th January 2022
quotequote all
Equus said:
If you strapped a man in place of the warhead, that would be fast enough to take the World Underwater Speed Record. yikes
EFA...!

eharding

14,648 posts

307 months

Monday 24th January 2022
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Equus said:
If you strapped a man in place of the warhead, that would be fast enough to take the World Underpants Accident Speed Record. yikes
EFA...!
EFA^2

Steve_D

13,801 posts

281 months

Tuesday 25th January 2022
quotequote all


Straight out of the Heath Robinson/Wile E. Coyote design studio.

Steve

Simpo Two

91,327 posts

288 months

Tuesday 25th January 2022
quotequote all
Steve_D said:
Straight out of the Heath Robinson/Wile E. Coyote design studio.
'ACME' hehe

RizzoTheRat

28,082 posts

215 months

Tuesday 25th January 2022
quotequote all
There was also a man portable version of the warhead the Davey Crockett used

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Atomic_Demol...

DaviBrons

12 posts

50 months

Friday 28th January 2022
quotequote all
CSS-5 mod.1, also referred to as DF-21
The most recent modification, the DF-21D, became the world's first and only anti-ship ballistic missile. The DF-21 can also be used as a carrier for anti-satellite/anti-missile weapons.
But kinetic space-to-earth systems are our future. Soon we will see a really strange and frightening weapon.