Rejecting Car 30 days - Consumer Rights Act 2015
Discussion
Edit:
Unfortunate tale of scam motor trader selling dodgy motors and not accepting rejection under consumer rights act.
Now a police matter.
Nothing to see here, move along.
I'll be sure to come back later with updates, but shouldn't have details up here while formal things are in motion.
Unfortunate tale of scam motor trader selling dodgy motors and not accepting rejection under consumer rights act.
Now a police matter.
Nothing to see here, move along.
I'll be sure to come back later with updates, but shouldn't have details up here while formal things are in motion.
Edited by V6XF on Monday 28th February 20:05
See section 20 (15) - it seems to be after they agree to refund but they could insist they want to inspect before they refund. so in a way get it off you first.
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/15/enact...
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/15/enact...
V6XF said:
My question is, do they have to refund me before they collect?
They're evidently completely untrustworthy, so I'm vary wary of letting them take thousands of pounds worth of car off my drive with nothing back in my bank account.
.
With the shoe on the other foot, how do they know that if they pay first you're not going to hide the car somewhere and block their numbers?They're evidently completely untrustworthy, so I'm vary wary of letting them take thousands of pounds worth of car off my drive with nothing back in my bank account.
.
123DWA said:
V6XF said:
My question is, do they have to refund me before they collect?
They're evidently completely untrustworthy, so I'm vary wary of letting them take thousands of pounds worth of car off my drive with nothing back in my bank account.
.
With the shoe on the other foot, how do they know that if they pay first you're not going to hide the car somewhere and block their numbers?They're evidently completely untrustworthy, so I'm vary wary of letting them take thousands of pounds worth of car off my drive with nothing back in my bank account.
.
They come, check I haven't put the windscreen through and such, pay me then take it away. Much like buying a car but in reverse.
Canon_Fodder said:
V6XF said:
I was hoping for a mutually timed exchange.
They come, check I haven't put the windscreen through and such, pay me then take it away. Much like buying a car but in reverse.
Suggest that to them - they might agree. They come, check I haven't put the windscreen through and such, pay me then take it away. Much like buying a car but in reverse.
OP out of interest if they have such a dodgy reputation, why on earth did you buy from them?
martinbiz said:
Canon_Fodder said:
Suggest that to them - they might agree.
This. In this day and age it couldn't be easier, they come and inspect the car, then phone back to base and get them to make a transfer to you, it should be in your bank within minutes and away they goOP out of interest if they have such a dodgy reputation, why on earth did you buy from them?
Their answer is still "take us to court", won't entertain a rejection at all. So now I'm enlisting solicitors. More of a waste of time and money for something they could very easily rectify. It's only a sale in reverse. Something I wouldnt expect is difficult on a sub £10k car.
The most unusual thing about their response is that it'll just cost them more in the long run. (unless they disappear completely, which I'm now dreading).
Edited by V6XF on Friday 25th February 11:51
V6XF said:
Last week I bought a very tidy car, looks nice, drives nice. Unfortunately, it drank 2 litres of oil on the way back to Nottingham from London.
Oh dear.
Local garage today has confirmed it's totally borked and it wants a new lump or full rebuild.
Why are they refusing you refund?Oh dear.
Local garage today has confirmed it's totally borked and it wants a new lump or full rebuild.
Edited by V6XF on Friday 25th February 11:49
Do they disagree with your local garages opinion?
Did they agree to you getting it inspected independently?
It's odd that such a dealer you describe would simply say "take us to court"
OP the best thing you should do now is take it for an MOT to prove it's a failure a week after you've bought it.
Dealer could question your local garages diagnosis, will be more difficult for them to do that if you have an Mot fail from a different garage showing the emissions you describe.
Dealer could question your local garages diagnosis, will be more difficult for them to do that if you have an Mot fail from a different garage showing the emissions you describe.
Following consultation with my solicitors they've actually been naughtier than I first realised.
The matter is now in the hands of my bank's fraud department, trading standards and the police.
So I'll leave this thread cold for a while and update upon eventual resolution / non-resolution.
Could everyone please keep their fingers crossed for me?
The matter is now in the hands of my bank's fraud department, trading standards and the police.
So I'll leave this thread cold for a while and update upon eventual resolution / non-resolution.
Could everyone please keep their fingers crossed for me?
4rephill said:
Pity the OP has deleted and edited the original opening post, so the thread makes no sense now.
(Also disappointing that yet again, the first person to reply didn't quote the original post, so it couldn't disappear, turning this into a meaningless thread)
Or, it's down until there's some progress, then I can put the content back.(Also disappointing that yet again, the first person to reply didn't quote the original post, so it couldn't disappear, turning this into a meaningless thread)
Once it's back up, I'll be sure to include all legitimate facts related to the thread for everyone to see. Not the most clever thing to do during an ongoing legal issue though. Unfortunately, threads from Pistonheaders have turned up in court during an ongoing case previously.
Edited by V6XF on Monday 28th February 20:02
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



