Will tattoos go out of fashion?
Poll: Will tattoos go out of fashion?
Total Members Polled: 181
Discussion
When I was a child, very few people had tattoos. There was quite a negative view towards tattoos and they certainly weren’t fashionable.
Fast forward 50 years and they seem to be everywhere. So ubiquitous that any shock value has long since dissipated.
Is it just a fad and will tattoos again become unpopular or taboo? Or are they here to stay forever?
Using that horrid US phrase - I don’t have any skin in the game, not having any tattoos although I find it interesting as my older brother had some quite noticeable ones done 45 years ago and it was definitely something unusual and frowned upon at that time.
Fast forward 50 years and they seem to be everywhere. So ubiquitous that any shock value has long since dissipated.
Is it just a fad and will tattoos again become unpopular or taboo? Or are they here to stay forever?
Using that horrid US phrase - I don’t have any skin in the game, not having any tattoos although I find it interesting as my older brother had some quite noticeable ones done 45 years ago and it was definitely something unusual and frowned upon at that time.
A lot of regret coming up for a lot of people!
Anyone with a betty Boo on their Calf, or a barbwire around their upper arm from 1990- they don't look so cool now they are 50, but there are not that many of them becasue it was a bit of a fad then
Same aging will happen and the next generation will see that times alot in their parents , that will put them off IMO
Anyone with a betty Boo on their Calf, or a barbwire around their upper arm from 1990- they don't look so cool now they are 50, but there are not that many of them becasue it was a bit of a fad then
Same aging will happen and the next generation will see that times alot in their parents , that will put them off IMO
They’ve been around for 5000 years or more so doubt they’ll fizzle out soon.
Does anyone get a tattoo for shock value? I would say not.
Sure, plenty of people will regret one done in haste but plenty others won’t. I doubt a faded tat will be top of the worry list when you’re in a care home.
Does anyone get a tattoo for shock value? I would say not.
Sure, plenty of people will regret one done in haste but plenty others won’t. I doubt a faded tat will be top of the worry list when you’re in a care home.
They've undoubtedly become mainstream and despite protestations I do believe from taking to a lot of people that the initial tattoo was had for some kind of shock/look-at-me/aren't I cool/aren't I a rebel reason but that subsequent ones less so.
The shock value these days is finding someone without a tattoo - really rare and quite individual as a choice
I was in the Navy and most Tats were drunken run ashore things with subsequent amounts of sobering up regret - even for subsequent ones. These days I believe any inebriation will preclude you from getting one done.
The shock value these days is finding someone without a tattoo - really rare and quite individual as a choice

I was in the Navy and most Tats were drunken run ashore things with subsequent amounts of sobering up regret - even for subsequent ones. These days I believe any inebriation will preclude you from getting one done.
Everywhere I go, there are more and more tattoo shops/parlours opening up, normally with an advertorial tag line of "I'm offering something different that the town doesn't have".
Where I work, I see many of the youngsters, who might earn £1.5k pm, but have already allocated £600-800 on a new tattoo. Fortunately they live at home, but as a consequence of the need to tattoo, never have any money. It seems to be a very InstaSnapFace thing of showing off your new tattoo to garner approval from your peers - "yeah, it's meant to be a monkey-snow-leopard-on-acid, cos my grandad went to Whipsnade once as a kid and really liked them".
Where I work, I see many of the youngsters, who might earn £1.5k pm, but have already allocated £600-800 on a new tattoo. Fortunately they live at home, but as a consequence of the need to tattoo, never have any money. It seems to be a very InstaSnapFace thing of showing off your new tattoo to garner approval from your peers - "yeah, it's meant to be a monkey-snow-leopard-on-acid, cos my grandad went to Whipsnade once as a kid and really liked them".
I think they are starting to become less popular as they become more common. My two sons (early mid 20s) think tattoos are "lame" and a waste of money. Hardly any of their friends have got any either.
Lots of people in our family have them (not me or the wife, but wife's sister, my brother, my nephew) but in our house, none.
Lots of people in our family have them (not me or the wife, but wife's sister, my brother, my nephew) but in our house, none.
GitsNovelties said:
A lot of regret coming up for a lot of people!
Anyone with a betty Boo on their Calf, or a barbwire around their upper arm from 1990- they don't look so cool now they are 50, but there are not that many of them becasue it was a bit of a fad then
Same aging will happen and the next generation will see that times alot in their parents , that will put them off IMO
I don't think tattoos will go out of fashion, but certain styles of tattoos will become unfashionable like the examples above.Anyone with a betty Boo on their Calf, or a barbwire around their upper arm from 1990- they don't look so cool now they are 50, but there are not that many of them becasue it was a bit of a fad then
Same aging will happen and the next generation will see that times alot in their parents , that will put them off IMO
The difference now is the fashion for having facial tattoos. Not many people had a Betty Boo tattoo on their forehead in the 90s.
As a medic people have been taking their clothes off in front of me for almost forty years.
In the eighties 'professional' tattoos on men were usually
military & maritime - these were often recognisable as having been military insignia or some such but no detail could be discerned on old skin
hardcore gay (Muscle Mary types)
definitely not mainstream in working class men - very occasional football insignia
Self administered or amateur tattoos on men
prison
not very bright/disturbed
Tattoos on women
prostitutes
hardcore gay
disturbed - often other evidence of self mutilation
very very occasional 'artistic' tattoo - tiny rose or dolphin on posh girls.
Facial tattoos on either - very disturbed - almost prama facie evidence of serious childhood abuse/personality disorder
After about the '90s they started turning up on young people; later on menopausal men and women. So they have completely lost any diagnostic value. FWIW I never found them to be frightening - probably because my older male cousins are inked (military and naughty boys).
I never got any not through any strong antipathy but I have never done anything significant enough to be worth commemorating and don't have the physique to display them.
My kids are 19 and 21. Lad thinks they are 'lame'. Daughter is gay, arty and 'edgy' so no doubt at some point she'll turn up with a selction of those sh
t monochrome, 'ironic' cartoons inked onto her 
In the eighties 'professional' tattoos on men were usually
military & maritime - these were often recognisable as having been military insignia or some such but no detail could be discerned on old skin
hardcore gay (Muscle Mary types)
definitely not mainstream in working class men - very occasional football insignia
Self administered or amateur tattoos on men
prison
not very bright/disturbed
Tattoos on women
prostitutes
hardcore gay
disturbed - often other evidence of self mutilation
very very occasional 'artistic' tattoo - tiny rose or dolphin on posh girls.
Facial tattoos on either - very disturbed - almost prama facie evidence of serious childhood abuse/personality disorder
After about the '90s they started turning up on young people; later on menopausal men and women. So they have completely lost any diagnostic value. FWIW I never found them to be frightening - probably because my older male cousins are inked (military and naughty boys).
I never got any not through any strong antipathy but I have never done anything significant enough to be worth commemorating and don't have the physique to display them.
My kids are 19 and 21. Lad thinks they are 'lame'. Daughter is gay, arty and 'edgy' so no doubt at some point she'll turn up with a selction of those sh
t monochrome, 'ironic' cartoons inked onto her 
vikingaero said:
I don't care if anyone does have a tattoo. It's their body, and if it makes it happier then all power to them. Just do it for the right reasons rather than being a sheeple.
Can you please tell me the right reasons just so I know next time I get a tattoo as obviously I wouldn't want to do it for the wrong ones.duffy78 said:
vikingaero said:
I don't care if anyone does have a tattoo. It's their body, and if it makes it happier then all power to them. Just do it for the right reasons rather than being a sheeple.
Can you please tell me the right reasons just so I know next time I get a tattoo as obviously I wouldn't want to do it for the wrong ones.vikingaero said:
I can understand people having a tattoo as a reminder of their Nan/Grandad. The wrong reason would be something like: "I'm going to have a tribal tattoo on my lower back to be different...."
No different to wanting anything for any reason. Do it, regret it later, or not. There’s the kind of sneering starting to creep in that people use purely because they themselves wouldn’t do/own a certain thing, belittling it just because it isn’t their personal choice and marking it out as being somehow wrong.
shirt said:
vikingaero said:
I can understand people having a tattoo as a reminder of their Nan/Grandad. The wrong reason would be something like: "I'm going to have a tribal tattoo on my lower back to be different...."
No different to wanting anything for any reason. Do it, regret it later, or not. There’s the kind of sneering starting to creep in that people use purely because they themselves wouldn’t do/own a certain thing, belittling it just because it isn’t their personal choice and marking it out as being somehow wrong.
ade73 said:
oddman said:
hardcore gay (Muscle Mary types)
That's getting used on the protein shake slurping knackers at work. 
I see tattoos and other features of hypermasculinisation as the counterpart to the lip filler, botox hyperfeminine trend in women.
Suspect, as others here, a communication system/culture which favours pictures over other values and ideas is somewhat to blame
vikingaero said:
I can understand people having a tattoo as a reminder of their Nan/Grandad. The wrong reason would be something like: "I'm going to have a tribal tattoo on my lower back to be different...."
You dont need a reason to get a tattoo, it can just be because something looks nice and yes also if you just want to feel different to the mainstream or the same as a peer group (thinking rockers, emo, goths, hipsters etc)It's up to the individual involved imo.
Edited by duffy78 on Thursday 24th February 10:39
Gassing Station | The Lounge | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



