350Z Pics
Author
Discussion

bad_roo

Original Poster:

5,193 posts

259 months

Wednesday 3rd August 2005
quotequote all
Just a bit of fun and an excuse to play with the clamps and suckers and also experiment with the new remote control unit I got.

Never done self portrait driving shots before.







Now need something with a longer lever arm to get it right out off the car...


>> Edited by bad_roo on Wednesday 3rd August 16:32

_dobbo_

14,619 posts

270 months

Wednesday 3rd August 2005
quotequote all
Looks like fun - I really must get a rig myself!

The middle one looks really noisy - I notice it was shot at iso 200, so it can't be that - what processing have you done on it? Was the noise deliberate?

bad_roo

Original Poster:

5,193 posts

259 months

Wednesday 3rd August 2005
quotequote all
I think it went that way during resizing. Put a cleaner version up there now.

up-the-dubs

4,282 posts

251 months

Wednesday 3rd August 2005
quotequote all
Great pics, What speed is the car going to get the effect?

Prof Higgins

11,706 posts

261 months

Wednesday 3rd August 2005
quotequote all
Was this the remote release from German ebayer? If so any probs to mention with unit or delivery etc? Nice pics

marctwo

3,666 posts

282 months

Wednesday 3rd August 2005
quotequote all
Prof Higgins said:
Was this the remote release from German ebayer? If so any probs to mention with unit or delivery etc? Nice pics



I have the remote release from the German bloke on e-bay and the service was excellent. The release itself is a little plasticy but works well and you can't complain compared to the price of the original Canon part!

bad_roo

Original Poster:

5,193 posts

259 months

Thursday 4th August 2005
quotequote all
Yep, it's from that German seller. The first one sent through had a faulty charger unit but when I pointed this out he sent another one through with no quibbles. The transmitter could do with being a bit beefier but it all seems to work OK.

I was driving slowly in second gear, trying to reduce jerkiness and vibration as much as possible, I experimented with four, six and ten second exposures, with and without flash. In order to get an ultra-crisp image, many magazine photographers insist on the engine being switched off and the car being pushed (giving away trade secrets ) so vehicle speed is not a priority.

Nuggs

4,640 posts

256 months

Thursday 4th August 2005
quotequote all
Like the pics, especially the first. I took some shots of my old man's Z a little while ago - fantastic car to photograph due to the level of detailing.

Anyway, apologies for the semi-hijack, but here are a few of mine...








>> Edited by Nuggs on Thursday 4th August 16:56

bad_roo

Original Poster:

5,193 posts

259 months

Friday 5th August 2005
quotequote all
Gonna bite and ask the obvious question. How did you do that last effect?

rico

7,917 posts

277 months

Friday 5th August 2005
quotequote all
bad_roo said:
Gonna bite and ask the obvious question. How did you do that last effect?


Ditto. Thats excellent!

Nuggs

4,640 posts

256 months

Tuesday 9th August 2005
quotequote all
rico said:

bad_roo said:
Gonna bite and ask the obvious question. How did you do that last effect?

Ditto. Thats excellent!

Sorry chaps, only just noticed your posts, otherwise I'd have responded earlier.

I can't remember the name of the PS filter which I used to get the effect (I'm at work with no PS on my computer) but will have a look tonight.

It didn't take long to get the desired effect in any case...

Rico - long time no chat mate, life okay?