RE: Jaguar XJ-SC | The Brave Pill
RE: Jaguar XJ-SC | The Brave Pill
Saturday 23rd April 2022

Jaguar XJ-SC | The Brave Pill

So wrong it's right?



Some victories are knockouts, and others are won on points. This week's Pill falls into the latter category when it comes to braveness. Lots of the elements of this well-priced Jaguar XJ-S might seem only moderately courageous on their own, but lumped together it is definitely one our our bolder offerings.

The first part of the prosecution's case is the famously shonky build quality that was still affecting all Jaguar products in the mid-80s, with this borne out by our Pill's MOT history being chequered enough to use as a chess board. Next comes the purple colour scheme that even the Artist Formally Known as Prince might have regarded as excessively mauve, plus a rear spoiler that couldn't look more incongruous if it was covered in fairy lights. Then consider the fact that this is one of the earlier Targa-style XJ-S convertibles, the ones that left a substantial amount of framework in place even with the fabric roof folded. And finally there's both the six-cylinder engine in place of a creamy V12, and the unexpected sight of a chunky gear lever where the delicate selector for an autobox would normally go. Yep, this is a very rare manual convertible.

Stuck together, that list in a car that is always going to be fishing in a very small pond for potential buyers. Something the selling dealer has acknowledged with an enticing price tag. Granted, £8,995 isn't the bottom of the market for an XJ-S these days - the imbalance between supply and demand that has dogged the car for most of its existence means rougher examples do still turn up cheaper. But our Pill has also been given some extensive recent restoration work, including a bare metal respray into the eye-bruising colour.


The six-cylinder XJ-S felt like a car that arrived well after it should have done. The original XJ-S had been launched with a V12 engine, reaching the market just before the mid-70s fuel crisis arrived to make the GT's low teens mpg look unacceptable. Jaguar quickly developed a revised 'high efficiency' engine, although 'higher' would be closer to the mark - revised cylinder heads and fuel injection moved economy closer to 20mpg, if rarely getting it over the mark. Fearing that didn't go far enough, Jaguar also commissioned a smaller engined XJ-S that would use a 3.8-litre AJ-6 six-pot for better mpg and lower entry-level pricing.

By the time this arrived in 1983 the decade was booming and the fuel crisis over. The six-pot XJ-S had 225hp, which was still enough to qualify it as a proper sportscar by the standards of the age, and some reviewers reported that the lighter powerplant did indeed improve handling responses. But as with many of the era's attempts at downsizing it didn't actually save much fuel; real-world economy wasn't much better than the V12 when driven at a similar pace. So the 3.6 and later 4.0-litre sixes were always seen as poor relations to the V12s.

The original XJ-S Convertible's awkward roof was another half measure, although one that Jaguar couldn't be entirely blamed for. The combination of increasingly tough American roll-over protection standards and the risk aversion of British Leyland's lawyers had created a belief within the company that some external protection framing was necessary for crash compliance, leading to the structure created for the Triumph Stag. The XJ-SC arrived more than a decade later, but it sported a very similar exoskeleton, with a full-width bar running between its B pillars when the roof was down, and the continued use of the coupe's fully framed doors. The quantities of wind in hair were similar to those of a full convertible, but it looked inelegant.


In this fashion conscious part of the market inelegant struggles to sell, especially as rival manufacturers were still offering fully convertible convertibles. Soon after the XJ-SC was launched an American coachbuilder, Hess & Eisenhardt in Ohio, started to produce its own fully decapitated convertible XJ-S, which looked much better and seems to have encouraged Jaguar to try again. A new fully convertible XJ-S arrived in 1988, and from that point onwards the Targa cars looked as if they had got lost down an evolutionary dead end.

Our Pill is a 1987 Targa-style XJ-SC convertible, and one that had clearly led an interesting life to judge from its MOT record. It failed its first digitized test in July 2006 on the basis of pitted discs, a below-par parking brake and a corroded suspension attachment. All these issues were sorted, with a clean pass recorded the following month. But the Jag's next MOT came five years later, producing a much more serious list of failure points including an insecure steering rack, excessive corrosion in both sides of the front structure and an excess of exhaust carbon monoxide. The car was put in for another test two weeks later in what seems to have been a triumph of hope over experience. The engine was now in tune, but none of the structural faults had been addressed and the tester even managed to find a few more for good measure.

It was the sort of 'not even close' MOT fail that would be a death warrant for most cars, but somebody clearly loved this XJ-S. Another five years passed before another MOT produced an even more grizzly fail sheet in April 2016, the reported rust now spreading to the rear structure and front crossmember. But then, in an act that seems to have been driven by pure love and what must have been a sturdy bank account, the car got properly sorted out - with a clean pass recorded four months later. Another gap in use followed, but the MOTs in 2020 and 2021 were both advisory free, although with only 50 miles between them.


The advert says our Pill's body kit, alloy wheels and rear spoiler are genuine TWR parts, applied at the same time as the rebuild. The combination of the pseudo-wing and the fabric roof looks deeply odd to me, although you may regard it as the height of sophistication. No matter; it would be relatively simple to remove it given the helpful shot showing it is held on by just four bolts inside the bootlid. The rest of the car looks pretty decent in the images, and presuming the structural work accurately targeted the car's corrosion it may well be that rarest of things, an inexpensive, rust-free Jaguar XJ-S. The manual gearbox is also a real novelty, just four of the 44 XJ-S currently listed in the classifieds have one; it might not suit the car's character as well as the auto but it will always be a conversation starter.

So, to summarize, our Pill is the wrong convertible with the wrong gearbox wearing both a courageous colour and an oddball bodykit. Yet the basics actually look well sorted and sensible when compared to the rust and risks common to cheaper versions of the XJ-S. You could never accuse this one of being a dull or obvious choice, which is one sort of brave.


See the full ad here



Author
Discussion

yme402

Original Poster:

670 posts

133 months

Saturday 23rd April 2022
quotequote all
Ugly doesn’t even start to describe this monstrosity

alabbasi

3,246 posts

118 months

Saturday 23rd April 2022
quotequote all
I had one of these for a while. It was a 6 cylinder with a 5 speed. The 5 speed manual made it a completely different car to the automatic.

Pflanzgarten

7,748 posts

56 months

Saturday 23rd April 2022
quotequote all
No buttresses, fail.

Chubbyross

5,014 posts

116 months

Saturday 23rd April 2022
quotequote all
Brave, as in I’d need courage to admit I owned it.

Double Fault

1,465 posts

294 months

Saturday 23rd April 2022
quotequote all
Always liked the rear on these…..not with that wing though

Gareth9702

400 posts

163 months

Saturday 23rd April 2022
quotequote all
I think that would be a brave choice and most likely will prove to be a bitter pill to swallow. Brave because of the challenging appearance, a bitter pill because we all know the rust is merely hidden, not cured.

Johnnytheboy

24,499 posts

217 months

Saturday 23rd April 2022
quotequote all
Interesting that the article refers to it as purple but it photos as blue. I've had this problem before photoing purple things.

AndySheff

6,935 posts

238 months

Saturday 23rd April 2022
quotequote all
What would annoy me about driving that is the stop position of the wipers. It's like the wiper parking position is broken and they just stop where they are when you turn them off.

Esceptico

8,897 posts

140 months

Saturday 23rd April 2022
quotequote all
I have a bit of a soft spot for the XJS, as I remember it being launched (unlike the E Type). But that must be the least desirable version they made (and the previous owner has seemingly tried hard to make it worse!)

Anyone thinking that looks good is probably beyond Specsavers’ help.

AmyRichardson

1,998 posts

73 months

Saturday 23rd April 2022
quotequote all
yme402 said:
Ugly doesn’t even start to describe this monstrosity
Yep. I grew up rather liking XJ-Ss, then to my early-2000s eyes they looked awful and now I've warmed to them again (somewhat.)

But not this - the targa-ish roof throws out every line and proportion that was even close to being right, and that paint...

ducnick

2,289 posts

274 months

Saturday 23rd April 2022
quotequote all
My dad had a 3.6 manual before swapping to a newer 4L auto. The older pre facelift rear lights cars were terrible for rust but I had a soft spot for the manual, it drove very well and made a xjs much more of a sports car. Still not a gearbox that should be rushed, there was a sense of a big flywheel for sure. Swapping the gear knob for one with a heavy tungsten insert improved matters.

TUS373

5,238 posts

312 months

Saturday 23rd April 2022
quotequote all
Rear number plate is wonky. It's a minor thing, but could be suggestive as the tip of the iceberg.

The XJS I like was Simon Templar's, AKA the Saint. Creamy white coupe. It was a lovely looking graceful thing. Looked perfect. The car for sale is fussy in several respects. They never looked right with a wing and body kit. Such 80s bolt ons detracted from the cars beautiful shape.

pycraft

1,500 posts

215 months

Saturday 23rd April 2022
quotequote all
If I had an absolute ton of money (which I don't) and the time (which I don't) I'd get this, take it to Lynx (if it still existed) and make an Eventer out of it. Sadly none of these will happen.


ChrisCh86

1,135 posts

75 months

Saturday 23rd April 2022
quotequote all
Clearly this car has been loved - hence the extensive rust repair work / restoration

Given that hopefully that's sorted and the manual gearbox and engine should be fairly trouble free, this seems like a good choice (and not actually that brave)!

The only thing that's brave is whether you can live with the looks!

Oldwolf

1,057 posts

224 months

Saturday 23rd April 2022
quotequote all
I have always lusted after an XJS, just not this one.
Jaguars should, in my view, be graceful and classy. This is neither.

jamieduff1981

8,092 posts

171 months

Saturday 23rd April 2022
quotequote all
Gareth9702 said:
a bitter pill because we all know the rust is merely hidden, not cured.
Seems rather accusative? These aren't difficult cars to sort out metal-work wise and there are numerous specialists with photographs all over their websites showing proper before-during-after rust repair on the XJ-S bodyshells.

Just curious as to why you're stating this one hasn't been fixed properly?

wpa1975

14,845 posts

145 months

Saturday 23rd April 2022
quotequote all
An XJS as a coupe or a full convertible is fine this is awful, wrong colour and the bodykit does not work.

Would also be a brave purchase with the amount of welding it has had.

jamieduff1981

8,092 posts

171 months

Saturday 23rd April 2022
quotequote all
The reason the 3.6 wasn't much better on fuel compared to the V12 is that it had a much shorter final drive ratio, such that the 0-60 time was very slightly quicker than the much taller geared HE V12.

The 3.6 could be said to do its best work lower down the RPM range also, whereas the V12 really loves to rev.

I've never quite managed to really like the cabriolet, but aid never say never. If I had a convertible XJ-S I'd go for a later full convertible as then I'd get the 4 seats. Yes, I achieve that which so many claim is completely impossible - I regularly go out with the full family of 4 in our 2+2 cars.

biggles330d

2,696 posts

181 months

Saturday 23rd April 2022
quotequote all
I worked in a pub as a youth. The landlady's wife had one of these, in that metallic ruby/burgundy colour jaguar do. At the time it looked a smart thing.
But there was a definately 'pub landlords' vibe about it, especially when we had to collect kitchen supplies from tesco in it once the pub grub delivery had been made and all the missing items for the menu were realised. Happy days.

Slowlygettingit

947 posts

72 months

Saturday 23rd April 2022
quotequote all
I see the occasional coupe (no idea which model etc) on the road and think they have aged well looks wise and agree with the post about Simon Templar’s car.

However this imho is definitely less than the sum of its parts and like staring at the sun should probably be avoided