Using your vehicle for self defence
Using your vehicle for self defence
Author
Discussion

Pixelpeep 135

Original Poster:

8,933 posts

171 months

Friday 13th May 2022
quotequote all
Hasn't happened to me, or anyone i know, but sometimes i've felt a vibe that something was going to go down...

I have had a situation which happened right in the height of all that moped crime just before covid where a few kids on mopeds circling the car, erratic movements, peering in, swerving in front and then out of the way etc. Not sure what the motivation was, car jacking, robbery, just messing about?

I've always driven flavour of the month cars for car jackings Golf R, Audi S3 and now an M135i so i think i am a little more heightened to it.

I said to my other half at the time, "if it comes to it, i'm ploughing into them, hope you are ok with that.."

only reason i bring it up now is that story that was in the news about the woman who nudged a protester and got banned from driving. The common theme seems to be you shouldn't use your vehicle as a weapon.

Where would you sit in a situation like above?

UTH

12,218 posts

207 months

Friday 13th May 2022
quotequote all
Interesting.

If you can prove it was in self defence, wouldn't it be the same as using a knife or other weapon in self defence?

untakenname

5,350 posts

221 months

Friday 13th May 2022
quotequote all
If it's self defence then it's ok, guy killed a knifeman with his car a couple of months back and was released without charge.
https://inews.co.uk/news/maida-vale-stabbing-drive...

Canon_Fodder

1,775 posts

92 months

Friday 13th May 2022
quotequote all
Pixelpeep 135 said:
H

"if it comes to it, i'm ploughing into them, .."
If they're pointing a gun / knife at you - yes

Otherwise - no



Driver101

14,451 posts

150 months

Friday 13th May 2022
quotequote all
There's already a few threads running on this very topic. Getting yourself out of a potentially dangerous situation is nothing like the woman pushing the protestors with her Range Rover.

It wasn't a nudge either. She was on the verge of going over the top of them. If they didn't slide on the road surface then the RR would have gone over them.

Edited by Driver101 on Friday 13th May 11:47

kiethton

14,639 posts

209 months

Friday 13th May 2022
quotequote all
Have done so once

Guy threatening me with a screwdriver and trying to block me leaving a residential car park (olld flat) while his mate went to collect a van to block me in. I was already on the phone to the police - "I fear for my safety, can I just go" and the answer was yes - I drove on, gently into him and accelerated slowly though him, he jumped out of the way after realizing that he wasn't going to stop a moving van and I cracked on and left. I heard nothing more but understand he was well known to the police and picked up subsequently.

Canon_Fodder

1,775 posts

92 months

Friday 13th May 2022
quotequote all
kiethton said:
Have done so once

Guy threatening me with a screwdriver and trying to block me leaving a residential car park (olld flat) while his mate went to collect a van to block me in. I was already on the phone to the police - "I fear for my safety, can I just go" and the answer was yes - I drove on, gently into him and accelerated slowly though him, he jumped out of the way after realizing that he wasn't going to stop a moving van and I cracked on and left. I heard nothing more but understand he was well known to the police and picked up subsequently.
That's an interesting real-world example

98elise

32,536 posts

190 months

Friday 13th May 2022
quotequote all
untakenname said:
If it's self defence then it's ok, guy killed a knifeman with his car a couple of months back and was released without charge.
https://inews.co.uk/news/maida-vale-stabbing-drive...
This. If I felt threatened enough I would have no problem using my car for self defence.



anonymous-user

83 months

Friday 13th May 2022
quotequote all
The best to do is make your way to the nearest service station and arm yourself with one of those microwaveable apple pies.

jamei303

3,084 posts

185 months

Friday 13th May 2022
quotequote all
Be aware that most new cars won't let you do this, the pedestrian and vehicle detection auto-braking will kick in. In the event you need to ram your way past an ambushing vehicle, if you sustain damage, the safety systems may even disable your car and switch of the ignition requiring a hard reset which can't be done in a hurry.

Driveeasy

87 posts

55 months

Friday 13th May 2022
quotequote all
Newarch said:
The best to do is make your way to the nearest service station and arm yourself with one of those microwaveable apple pies.
This. They are hotter than the sun.

rfisher

5,063 posts

312 months

Friday 13th May 2022
quotequote all
Remember seeing a video of a bloke in the USA who nudged a Hell's Angel and his bike went over.

Did it because he panicked as 30+ of them were passing him on both sides.

Bikers then forced him to stop, smashed the window to get in, and either killed him or did some serious damage to him.

So don't try it with a group of bikers.

OutInTheShed

14,423 posts

55 months

Friday 13th May 2022
quotequote all
This assault is sounding pre-meditated already!

</devils_advocate>

NMNeil

5,860 posts

79 months

Friday 13th May 2022
quotequote all
Considering you are in a tin box with lockable doors and tough to break windows, going to be hard to prove that driving over someone was your only method of self defense, and you had no other alternatives. scratchchin


SeekerOfTruthAndPies

266 posts

66 months

Friday 13th May 2022
quotequote all
As with any hypothetical situation, it would depend on the actual circumstances unfortunately. The law allows you to use reasonable force to defend yourself - the key word here being reasonable.

The real world example above of man with knife being killed was deemed reasonable. Running over a moped rider because you're in a Golf R and he's riding erratically is probably (definitely) not.

georgeyboy12345

4,601 posts

64 months

Friday 13th May 2022
quotequote all
Pixelpeep 135 said:
only reason i bring it up now is that story that was in the news about the woman who nudged a protester and got banned from driving. The common theme seems to be you shouldn't use your vehicle as a weapon.
That is nothing like being carjacked.

K4sper

356 posts

101 months

Friday 13th May 2022
quotequote all
NMNeil said:
Considering you are in a tin box with lockable doors and tough to break windows, going to be hard to prove that driving over someone was your only method of self defense, and you had no other alternatives. scratchchin
Neither of which are part of the legal test.

You will need to show that (1) you actually believed that the use of force (i.e. some force) was necessary in the circumstances and (2) you actually believed that the amount of force you used was reasonable in the circumstances.

If you can convince a jury / magistrate that in that very moment you only did what you honestly and instinctively thought necessary, then the defence should succeed

donkmeister

12,837 posts

129 months

Friday 13th May 2022
quotequote all
jamei303 said:
Be aware that most new cars won't let you do this, the pedestrian and vehicle detection auto-braking will kick in. In the event you need to ram your way past an ambushing vehicle, if you sustain damage, the safety systems may even disable your car and switch of the ignition requiring a hard reset which can't be done in a hurry.
My LS460 allows you to disable these features - switch by the TPMS reset button IIRC... Might have to acquaint myself with the operation just in case!

Pica-Pica

16,555 posts

113 months

Friday 13th May 2022
quotequote all
K4sper said:
NMNeil said:
Considering you are in a tin box with lockable doors and tough to break windows, going to be hard to prove that driving over someone was your only method of self defense, and you had no other alternatives. scratchchin
Neither of which are part of the legal test.

You will need to show that (1) you actually believed that the use of force (i.e. some force) was necessary in the circumstances and (2) you actually believed that the amount of force you used was reasonable in the circumstances.

If you can convince a jury / magistrate that in that very moment you only did what you honestly and instinctively thought necessary, then the defence should succeed
You would have a hard job convincing me, it would have to be extreme, and the vehicle trapped.

K4sper

356 posts

101 months

Friday 13th May 2022
quotequote all
Pica-Pica said:
K4sper said:
NMNeil said:
Considering you are in a tin box with lockable doors and tough to break windows, going to be hard to prove that driving over someone was your only method of self defense, and you had no other alternatives. scratchchin
Neither of which are part of the legal test.

You will need to show that (1) you actually believed that the use of force (i.e. some force) was necessary in the circumstances and (2) you actually believed that the amount of force you used was reasonable in the circumstances.

If you can convince a jury / magistrate that in that very moment you only did what you honestly and instinctively thought necessary, then the defence should succeed
You would have a hard job convincing me, it would have to be extreme, and the vehicle trapped.
But they wouldn't have to convince you that it was necessary, only that they thought it was. There are a thousand situations where someone in a car might honestly believe it would be reasonable to push someone out of the way with their car. Granted, a moped weaving around in front of you might not cut it... but 5 moped riders that stopped all around you car shouting at the driver might lead a little old lady to think she has no choice but to floor it.

Also doesn't matter if that belief is mistakenly held, as long as it is genuinely held