Recent 3200 Recall
Discussion
A geometry check would only be neccessary where the track rod ends are removed from the rack or their settings disturbed. The latter cannot be done unless the locknuts are released.
My understanding is that the steering rack is released and the subframe supporting the engine and supension is lowered (to provide access for welding) at the rear whilst engine is independently supported. Remedial welding work then carried out to brackets on subframe and refit in reverse order.
I assume that rack is physically removed and that the track rod ends can be left assembled on the rack precisely to avoid altering tracking adjustment. This simply means that the taper seat of the trackrod end's swivel bearing will be split (from steering arm) each side to release the rack and subsequent refitting would not disturb tracking at all. So no, I don't see why a geo check would be necessary at Maserati's expense. Nonetheless as Mr T has pointed out, its good practice to avoid undue tyre wear as well as optimising handling and roadholding
On basis that Maserati HQ is paying for the recall, why shouldn't they do the job in the most cost effective and efficient manner?
HTH
ps: Some have apparently stated that the problem affects LHD and not RHD. This is wrong. The racks come in LHD / RHD variants but the subframe (on which the affected brackets are welded) is common to both - Probably dealers seeking to avoid a rush. The same reason is probably behind Maserati UK notifying VOSA on their INTENTION to recall but not confirming the recall was actually underway. VOSA cannot update their datatabase until the recall has actually started of course.
My understanding is that the steering rack is released and the subframe supporting the engine and supension is lowered (to provide access for welding) at the rear whilst engine is independently supported. Remedial welding work then carried out to brackets on subframe and refit in reverse order.
I assume that rack is physically removed and that the track rod ends can be left assembled on the rack precisely to avoid altering tracking adjustment. This simply means that the taper seat of the trackrod end's swivel bearing will be split (from steering arm) each side to release the rack and subsequent refitting would not disturb tracking at all. So no, I don't see why a geo check would be necessary at Maserati's expense. Nonetheless as Mr T has pointed out, its good practice to avoid undue tyre wear as well as optimising handling and roadholding
On basis that Maserati HQ is paying for the recall, why shouldn't they do the job in the most cost effective and efficient manner?
HTH
ps: Some have apparently stated that the problem affects LHD and not RHD. This is wrong. The racks come in LHD / RHD variants but the subframe (on which the affected brackets are welded) is common to both - Probably dealers seeking to avoid a rush. The same reason is probably behind Maserati UK notifying VOSA on their INTENTION to recall but not confirming the recall was actually underway. VOSA cannot update their datatabase until the recall has actually started of course.
Gassing Station | Supercar General | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff