RE: BMW to build new supercar?
RE: BMW to build new supercar?
Tuesday 9th August 2005

BMW to build new supercar?

Z10 to replace failed retro-look Z8


New Z10 won't look like this!
New Z10 won't look like this!
BMW is on the brink of deciding whether to make a successor to the £84,000 Z8 -- a stab at the supercar market which didn't work visually or financially.

A report in this week's Autocar based on conversations with BMW engineers suggests that the car is likely to come out of the Bavarian company's Californian studios and be called the Z10.

Saving weight is the central theme, with an aluminium spaceframe chassis, first used in the Z8, the centrepiece. It'll be about the same size as a Lamborghini Gallardo but weigh 250Kg less at around 1,200Kg. Motive power will come from the now-established 500bhp V10 found in the nose of the M5 and M6 -- a chunky but potent motor. The report suggests that BMW may bore it out to 5.5-litres to boost power to 550bhp, driving through a seven-speed sequential gearbox. That kerb weight gives it a power-weight ratio of 458bhp/tonne, beating both the Porsche Carrera GT and the Ferrari F430.

It will include all the electronics you would expect to keep it on the road while pressing on, together with active spoilers and a venturi underbody to suck onto the tarmac. Open-topped, it will feature a carbon fibre folding roof to allow it to compete with the likes of the Mercedes SL while keeping weight and the centre of gravity down.

Since the Z8 sold poorly -- fewer than 6,000 were sold during the three years it was on sale -- the studio is being asked to come with a more aggressive style than the retro look it plastered on the hapless Z8. It will be built using spare capacity at the Rolls Royce factory at Goodwood.

Expect it to be sold close to top-end 911 money -- similar to the Aston Martin V8 Vantage -- at around £80,000-90,000.

Author
Discussion

munky

Original Poster:

5,328 posts

277 months

Tuesday 9th August 2005
quotequote all
80 to 90 grand for a BMW? They're having a laugh.

r988

7,495 posts

258 months

Tuesday 9th August 2005
quotequote all
1,200Kg & 550bhp, sounds like fun.

pounana

41 posts

304 months

Tuesday 9th August 2005
quotequote all
I disagree. I think the Z8 was an achingly beautiful, potent car. Yes, it was retro, but would you prefer a Bangle?

phatgixer

4,988 posts

278 months

Tuesday 9th August 2005
quotequote all
I reckon a V10 3 series CSL (sub 1200kg) would sell. £75k waiting....

munky

Original Poster:

5,328 posts

277 months

Tuesday 9th August 2005
quotequote all
Saw a Z8 quite recently, looks pretty good IMO. I did think it would sell better after its product placement in a Bond film, but it didn't unfortunately

oppressed mass

217 posts

312 months

Tuesday 9th August 2005
quotequote all
hapless? Cannot agree. Are you looking at the Z8 through a wonky mirror? The Z8 is a beautiful car, just far too expensive.

v15ben

16,217 posts

270 months

Tuesday 9th August 2005
quotequote all
There are a few Z8s around London and the more I see,the less I am convinced by them really. Look OK but nothing special!!

vladd

8,196 posts

294 months

Tuesday 9th August 2005
quotequote all
I agree with most of the comments below, I thought it was a very beautiful car. Can the reason it didn't sell well be the price?

fidgits

17,202 posts

258 months

Tuesday 9th August 2005
quotequote all
the problem with the Z8 was simple..

Yes it was glorious to look at - but it was like driving any other american saloon - hopelessly detached and wallowy...

so much for the 'ultimate driving machine'

munky

Original Poster:

5,328 posts

277 months

Tuesday 9th August 2005
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]


Because you'd buy the Aston. You just would. Or possibly a Typhon, if you're slightly mad.

Zod

35,295 posts

287 months

Tuesday 9th August 2005
quotequote all
munky said:


anonymous said:
[redacted]




Because you'd buy the Aston. You just would. Or possibly a Typhon, if you're slightly mad.

BMW haters care. When you can spend double that on a Merc, it's a silly comment.

I'm interested in the AMV8, but it just isn't enough. Power/Weight is lower than my CSL. It's a more "special" car, but with a 500BHP M6 at the same price and the M5 £20k less plus the products of Porsche AG, I just can't go for it.

As for buying a TVR for that money. Er no.

>> Edited by Zod on Tuesday 9th August 11:06

dinkel

27,776 posts

287 months

Tuesday 9th August 2005
quotequote all
It's a very classic looking beauty . . . and will be considered a classic over the years to come.

The V10 in a monster sporter is a great idea. Nazca anyone?

Slightly off topic: when TVR would consider a US V8 iso a AJP8 mk2 . . . this V10 is something to consider . . .

burwoodman

18,718 posts

275 months

Tuesday 9th August 2005
quotequote all
There is no way they will produce an £80K car with this sort of power to weight/performance. More like £130k

An M6 is £85K with a decent spec.

granville

18,764 posts

290 months

Tuesday 9th August 2005
quotequote all
The 'Z10' as in the latest Autocar: looks amazing with a smattering of Carrera GT about the flanks and a touch of Gallardo at the rear.

1200kg? 458bhp/tonne?

Sounds reasonable.

Adam B

29,710 posts

283 months

Tuesday 9th August 2005
quotequote all
fidgits said:
the problem with the Z8 was simple..

Yes it was glorious to look at - but it was like driving any other american saloon - hopelessly detached and wallowy...

so much for the 'ultimate driving machine'


plus LHD only (we buy more convertibles in UK than Italy, Spain and France added together)

gibo993

966 posts

294 months

Tuesday 9th August 2005
quotequote all
munky said:
80 to 90 grand for a BMW? They're having a laugh.


A risk manager with a TVR!!
(no offence intended just thought it was funny)

Sounds like a great car, if the M5 is faster than a 430 imagine what this little beast will be like.

Sounds like good value.

Raify

6,556 posts

277 months

Tuesday 9th August 2005
quotequote all
munky said:
80 to 90 grand for a BMW? They're having a laugh.


Why? People are happy to pay £100k+ for an Audi (o.k., it has a Lambo badge stuck on it). Why can one car company do a supercar and not another?

munky

Original Poster:

5,328 posts

277 months

Tuesday 9th August 2005
quotequote all
Zod said:

munky said:

anonymous said:
[redacted]


Because you'd buy the Aston. You just would. Or possibly a Typhon, if you're slightly mad.


BMW haters care. When you can spend double that on a Merc, it's a silly comment.

I'm interested in the AMV8, but it just isn't enough. Power/Weight is lower than my CSL.


It looks an awful lot nicer though, and is made in Brtiain.
Zod said:

It's a more "special" car, but with a 500BHP M6 at the same price and the M5 £20k less plus the products of Porsche AG, I just can't go for it.

Well, there we're getting off topic because the M5 and 6 aren't sports cars, they're fast saloons and thus incomparable. It's not about power alone or even power to weight, which doesn't help you in corners. I need a 2 seater convertible (the less electronics the better) not a big computer controlled saloon, and therefore wouldn't even consider M3/5/6. WIth circa 80k, I'd be looking primarily at the Aston, a second hand 'rarri, the carbon fibre 215mph TVR, the Z10 or a Porker. In that order, pretty much.

Zod said:
As for buying a TVR for that money. Er no.


Whereas I would. Wouldn't the world be dull if everyone had the same tastes?

ErnestM

11,621 posts

296 months

Tuesday 9th August 2005
quotequote all
They need to drastically alter the path that they are on with the Z/family

If BMW built an updated M1 with a V-10 engine it would sell by the truckloads...




ErnestM

nickytwohats

2,093 posts

270 months

Tuesday 9th August 2005
quotequote all
Put me on the waiting list please