RE: BMW raids DTM, F1 and Formula E to create new V8
RE: BMW raids DTM, F1 and Formula E to create new V8
Thursday 14th July 2022

BMW raids DTM, F1 and Formula E to create new V8

BMW's return to sportscars couldn't have any old V8 - here's how the 640hp P66/3 came to be


There’s nothing like an old V8 to make a new race car even more exciting. The Porsche 963, for example, uses an evolution of the screaming 4.6 first used in the RS Spyder 15 years ago. Now BMW is following suit (kind of), confirming that its new M Hybrid V8 has a combustion engine with roots in an old DTM car.

Back when DTM was using properly exotic race cars unique to the series (and wasn’t just another GT3 championship), BMW’s M4 DTM was using a ‘P66’ V8. It was a naturally aspirated 4.0-litre 90-degree unit, making peak power at 7,500rpm; for 2017 and 2018 it produced more than 500hp and was known as the P66/1 - that’s the engine that’s been used to build the M Hybrid’s V8.

Which is odd, because the new LMDh’s engine is twin-turbocharged, and BMW already has a twin turbo V8 race engine - the P63 as found in the M8 GTE. But apparently that was too heavy. The four-cylinder engine in the later M4 DTM was dismissed on the grounds of durability. A new engine would have been too expensive and time consuming to create. So P66/1 it was - keeping up?

There’s plenty more to recommend the V8 than merely being light and tough, too. “It is a huge plus that we were able to make use of existing materials such as steel and aluminium from BMW’s time in Formula 1 for the basis of the engine, as well as for individual components – like shafts, housing and small parts” said Ulrich Schulz, Head of Drivetrain Design at BMW M Motorsport. Interesting that BMW’s time in F1 can still have an influence.

Then the hard work on the P66/3 could begin, given it was an originally an N/A V8 that needed to be turbocharged and work as part of a hybrid system. A middle-ground P66/2 was made by BMW, adding the two turbos and modifying the crank, which was then extensively put through its paces on the test bench. Only then was the P66/3 given the go ahead, with a little bit of help from the Formula E team in getting the electric motor integrated.

And that seems like the easy bit, in truth, with the P66 requiring its injection system to be rebuilt for direct injection, having its block and head recast and then the pair of turbos fitted. “Converting the normally-aspirated P66/1 engine into a bi-turbo and then working with the electric drivetrain colleagues to turn it into a hybrid drive system was very complex” said Schulz, presumably underselling the challenge somewhat.

What an engine they’ve come up with, though. The 3,999cc of V8 produces approximately 640hp and 479lb ft, revving all the way to 8,200rpm. That’s before the electrical assistance too, don’t forget. “We now feel that nothing is standing in the way of testing” added Schulz.

Which is good news, as there’s really not much time for it. With the engine first started at the end of last month, the end of July will see a rollout in Italy, with ‘intensive’ testing to follow. The Daytona 24 in January is sounding more exciting by the week.


 

Author
Discussion

GT9

Original Poster:

9,089 posts

203 months

Thursday 14th July 2022
quotequote all
Methinks BMW should put this engine into the CSL Hommage R for a limited production run available to PH members who have loyally stood by them in the last few years of 'experimental' aesthetics, whilst holding back a sea of negativity from angry boomers.
So that's just Nickfrog and I then smile

BOR

5,152 posts

286 months

Thursday 14th July 2022
quotequote all
Are those bhp numbers correct?

Seems quite low, unless there is an air restrictor, but then a 6 cylinder might have made more sense?

CraigyMc

18,373 posts

267 months

Thursday 14th July 2022
quotequote all
BOR said:
Are those bhp numbers correct?

Seems quite low, unless there is an air restrictor, but then a 6 cylinder might have made more sense?
It'll be restricted by the regs, no doubt.

MissChief

8,007 posts

199 months

Thursday 14th July 2022
quotequote all
CraigyMc said:
BOR said:
Are those bhp numbers correct?

Seems quite low, unless there is an air restrictor, but then a 6 cylinder might have made more sense?
It'll be restricted by the regs, no doubt.
The cars end up with a Balance of Power adjustment anyway so chasing peak power is pointless. What they're after is driveability and torque.

Twinair

1,050 posts

173 months

Thursday 14th July 2022
quotequote all
GT9 said:
Methinks BMW should put this engine into the CSL Hommage R for a limited production run available to PH members who have loyally stood by them in the last few years of 'experimental' aesthetics, whilst holding back a sea of negativity from angry boomers.
So that's just Nickfrog and I then smile
I get one too! I even have the latest ‘ugly’ - ‘non pure’ M4Cx…

Hoofty

822 posts

221 months

Friday 15th July 2022
quotequote all
Thanks for this PH - this and the PDK article are some of my favourite stuff in ages. More please.

BOR said:
a 6 cylinder might have made more sense?
I6 matches the brand, if that's what you mean - but would be suicide for enduro racing (see the 2011 Aston AMR-One, the most recent abject lesson in crank vibration (apparently)).

This is a really niche complaint, but I'm increasingly bummed about how endurance racing powertrains seem to be coalescing almost entirely around 4-ish litre flat crank V8s. Now even Corvette have gone the same way (dead to me, I tell you), the only car with anything else in recent WEC and Le Mans races has been the Porsche RSR, which is considerably more sonorous than the rest of the field.

Yes yes, I understand the need for/drive towards efficient powertrains, but one of the most enjoyable aspects of endurance racing has always been the sheer variety of tunes being played, and a dearth thereof just makes me sad. Even V10s became dull when they were the only sound coming from F1 cars, so I do hope that one of the other players implements something with a differing (and, ahem, nicer) timbre.

mat205125

17,790 posts

244 months

Friday 15th July 2022
quotequote all
BOR said:
Are those bhp numbers correct?

Seems quite low, unless there is an air restrictor, but then a 6 cylinder might have made more sense?
It'll definitely be restricted (shown in the pictures), and 500bhp from 4.0L at 7500rpm is pretty good

SturdyHSV

10,443 posts

198 months

Friday 15th July 2022
quotequote all
New crank, recast block and heads, added turbos, undoubtedly thus different intake and exhaust, different rpm range and such so no doubt different cams, it's sounding a bit like a P66/trigger's broom isn't it? hehe

Either way, more engine porn please, this is Pistonheads after all thumbup

CraigyMc

18,373 posts

267 months

Friday 15th July 2022
quotequote all
SturdyHSV said:
New crank, recast block and heads, added turbos, undoubtedly thus different intake and exhaust, different rpm range and such so no doubt different cams, it's sounding a bit like a P66/trigger's broom isn't it? hehe

Either way, more engine porn please, this is Pistonheads after all thumbup
It's really BMW saying "we have a decent level of depth to our motorsport engine department".

In an LMP car they'll care a fair amount about fuel economy, reliability and heat rejection as well as more obvious racing things such as outright power/torque/driveability measurements.

nismo48

7,221 posts

238 months

Friday 15th July 2022
quotequote all
+1 smile

Hoofty said:
Thanks for this PH - this and the PDK article are some of my favourite stuff in ages. More please.

BOR said:
a 6 cylinder might have made more sense?
I6 matches the brand, if that's what you mean - but would be suicide for enduro racing (see the 2011 Aston AMR-One, the most recent abject lesson in crank vibration (apparently)).

This is a really niche complaint, but I'm increasingly bummed about how endurance racing powertrains seem to be coalescing almost entirely around 4-ish litre flat crank V8s. Now even Corvette have gone the same way (dead to me, I tell you), the only car with anything else in recent WEC and Le Mans races has been the Porsche RSR, which is considerably more sonorous than the rest of the field.

Yes yes, I understand the need for/drive towards efficient powertrains, but one of the most enjoyable aspects of endurance racing has always been the sheer variety of tunes being played, and a dearth thereof just makes me sad. Even V10s became dull when they were the only sound coming from F1 cars, so I do hope that one of the other players implements something with a differing (and, ahem, nicer) timbre.

Hoofty

822 posts

221 months

Sunday 17th July 2022
quotequote all
Hoofty said:
This is a really niche complaint, but I'm increasingly bummed about how endurance racing powertrains seem to be coalescing almost entirely around 4-ish litre flat crank V8s. Now even Corvette have gone the same way (dead to me, I tell you), the only car with anything else in recent WEC and Le Mans races has been the Porsche RSR, which is considerably more sonorous than the rest of the field.

Yes yes, I understand the need for/drive towards efficient powertrains, but one of the most enjoyable aspects of endurance racing has always been the sheer variety of tunes being played, and a dearth thereof just makes me sad. Even V10s became dull when they were the only sound coming from F1 cars, so I do hope that one of the other players implements something with a differing (and, ahem, nicer) timbre.
Nobody is reading this but merely for completeness, I've just learned that the Cadillac LMDH car has a 5.5l N/A crossplane V8 - and it sounds gooooood.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6NFUwCahhhU

As you were. smile

blade7

11,311 posts

247 months

Sunday 17th July 2022
quotequote all
mat205125 said:
BOR said:
Are those bhp numbers correct?

Seems quite low, unless there is an air restrictor, but then a 6 cylinder might have made more sense?
It'll definitely be restricted (shown in the pictures), and 500bhp from 4.0L at 7500rpm is pretty good
Wondered why the intakes were so small.