RE: 2022 Cayman GT4 RS vs 911 (992) GT3 | PH Video
RE: 2022 Cayman GT4 RS vs 911 (992) GT3 | PH Video
Monday 15th August 2022

2022 Cayman GT4 RS vs 911 (992) GT3 | PH Video

Which Porsche heavy hitter best suits its epic 4.0-litre naturally aspirated flat-six?


I feel like a broken record when I talk about the Porsche 911 GT3. Sorry about that, but it’s not my fault. Blame Porsche. You see, I like naturally aspirated cars. Not because I am necessarily hung up on yesteryear but because, when it comes to sports cars, they’re just more fun. When the manufacturers that are now producing electric and petrol-electric cars stop obsessing about delivering the quickest and most responsive cars ever – and instead tune them to be engaging on the road – maybe I’ll be able to call those fun, too.

I am talking about torque holes. Natural aspiration means a lot of those, usually at the lower end of the rev range. That sounds terrible but it isn’t. It’s good. Because when you’ve got upwards of 500hp, like the GT3, a lack of low-end torque allows you the breathing space to savour things. To pin the throttle for longer and enjoy the motor before doing a billion miles per hour. You use the lack of torque to your advantage, to make the experience last longer. Try doing that in a McLaren Artura, which is not only turbocharged but electrified as well. Any gear, any speed, pin the throttle in that and, just a couple of seconds later, you’ll be at imprisonable speeds. Is that your idea of fun? It ain’t mine.

Then there’s the noise. Noise is theatre. It’s what PHers thrive on – well, this one, anyway. And nothing makes a better noise than a crisp, naturally aspirated motor. No turbos to stifle things. True, the latest GT3 has lost a bit of depth with particulate filters but even so – there are few motors that sound crisper and more stupefying than the 4.0-litre MA1 flat-six. You know the drill: a 9,000rpm rev limit, the last 2,000 of which is like Cerberus with a spike up his bottom. It’s the stuff dreams I tell you.  

All this creates a paradox, though. The 911 GT3 isn’t a dedicated road car. It’s been compromised to go racing, pure and simple. It’s a homologation special, which means it shouldn’t be a great road car. Yet it is, mainly because of that engine. The performance is simply more accessible than the new breed of sports cars, which, while technically better, just aren’t better road cars. Faster, yes. More responsive, sure. But not more fun. That’s the bit that keeps getting forgotten in the pursuit of perfection. It turns out that true perfection is all about flaws.

Some would argue that even the 911 GT3 has got a little bit frenetic. Since the in 992 GT3 arrived, with that double-wishbone front end – there to improve the racing cars – it’s certainly hyper-alert. And on the road that isn’t to everyone’s taste. So, how about a more road-biased version? No, not the 911 GT3 Touring. That’s basically the same without a wing. A car that they said would never be built. A car that, on paper, is even better than the 911 GT3. A car with the engine where it should be if you're of an engineering mindset: in the middle. And not just any engine. That engine. The MA1, in all its breath-taking glory.

I don’t know why I am trying to create suspense. The Cayman GT4 RS isn’t a news story anymore. That doesn’t mean it’s not special, mind. Here is a car with all the sense of purpose of a GT3 – the wings, the vents, the silly revs – but it’s not meant to be a racing car. It’s a plaything, and I don’t just mean for the lucky owners. It feels like even its creation was playful. A way for a bunch of engineers to let off some steam and, well, have some fun. And in the process, they’ve created one of the most fun cars ever, and certainly in modern times. The suspension and steering are perfectly suited to road driving. That part of the GT4 RS is calmer.

But the engine, well that’s just completely uncut and unhinged. Can you think of many production sports cars that have no sealed bulkhead between you and the motor? Not even a sheet of glass? Well, from the driver's seat you can reach behind and touch the engine in the GT4, but there's no need to reach for the noise. It's there, enveloping you, and not just the thrashing cams and raging pistons, but the gulps of air it swigs through the inlet ducts right behind your ears. Combined it is, well, indescribable. So I won’t bother to try. Instead, we made a video of the Porsche Cayman GT4 RS and, just for fun, we brought along a 992 GT3 as well. It’s a celebration of fun, and I hope it brings you as much fun as we had making it.


Author
Discussion

sege

Original Poster:

604 posts

253 months

Monday 15th August 2022
quotequote all
That's the most convincing review I've seen yet on the GT4 RS. Lot of emotion, but I think that can be forgiven in the company of these two cars, and most importantly, it was all backed up with descriptive and sense-making observations anyway.

Great work John! Loved that.


esotericar

745 posts

58 months

Monday 15th August 2022
quotequote all
Great video.

For me it's a bit of a pity that the GT4 RS looks like something out of a tuning catalogue and that you can't have it in manual. I'd take it with regular GT4 styling (actually, I'd really prefer GTS styling) minus the wing but with the great engine and chassis hardware and with a manual gearbox. What a bloody car that would be.

One niggle with the video. Worth noting that the peak quoted downforce of 100kg means basically no downforce at road speeds and not much at track speeds. Downforce increases with the square of speed. The GT4 RS's top speed is 196mph. At half that speed, ie 98mph, you'll be getting about 25kg of downforce, which is basically nowt in the context of a car that weighs over 1,500kg fuelled up with a driver onboard. I really don't know why journalists can't grasp this instead of breathlessly regurgitating downforce numbers as if cars like this are being nailed to the tarmac with a couple of tonnes of force. This car is best viewed as not having any lift as opposed to having significant downforce.

GreatScott2016

2,579 posts

119 months

Monday 15th August 2022
quotequote all
Opening paragraph summed it up perfectly. EVs could travel at warp speed but if they lack soul and theatre, then they're not for me ..... these two on the other hand have it in bucket loads, quite selfish really smile

SuperSonicSloth

158 posts

103 months

Monday 15th August 2022
quotequote all
How wonderful it is that Porsche continue to build machines that are focussed around driver engagement and enjoyment? Yes I'm sure somebody will be along in a minute to talk about customer preference and waiting lists, but let's just celebrate the fact that these exist at all.

So much of the output of the other comparable marques leaves me cold these days. Thank you Porsche for giving us these at a time the competition are all going in other directions. If it's going to be all electric for the foreseeable future, then I just hope some engineering geniuses out there can figure out how to translate the experience...

cerb4.5lee

45,114 posts

211 months

Monday 15th August 2022
quotequote all
The write up was so good that it made me miss the NA S65 engine in the E92 M3...and I did nothing but slate that engine for its max power at 8300rpm and its relatively low torque to weight ratio.

I will look forward to watching the video later. thumbup

Mr_Sukebe

390 posts

239 months

Monday 15th August 2022
quotequote all
One point that I’m a little confused about is where you can wring 9000rpm out of either of the cars on a road in the UK and not receive a speeding fine or be arrested?

I get that both are engineering marvels, but still struggle with the concept of their use in the real world. They just seem unnecessarily fast. The older I get, the more I think that a Smart Roadster with a manual box would be about perfect

s2000db

1,423 posts

184 months

Monday 15th August 2022
quotequote all
For the ‘actual’ price you’ll pay for either of these (overs on a second hand car, or the depreciation on a dozen Cayennes), there are much better cars available.
For the sticker price alone… yup they’re remarkable!

Demonix

839 posts

243 months

Monday 15th August 2022
quotequote all
Both awesome cars but if I had to stump up my own cash for one I'd have the GT4-RS, just prefer the Cayman's smaller silhouette, would have to have bonnet and spoiler colour matched to the body though as black item is a bit Tokyo drift for my taste!

Maccmike8

1,612 posts

85 months

Monday 15th August 2022
quotequote all
The engine must surely be sealed from the driver? IVA wise its a must due to fumes etc.

stuckmojo

4,117 posts

219 months

Monday 15th August 2022
quotequote all
s2000db said:
For the ‘actual’ price you’ll pay for either of these (overs on a second hand car, or the depreciation on a dozen Cayennes), there are much better cars available.
For the sticker price alone… yup they’re remarkable!
That's it. At the nonexistent sticker price, they are phenomenal. At the racket price these are flipped for, no.

ChrisCh86

1,134 posts

75 months

Monday 15th August 2022
quotequote all
I'd take the Cayman (in my imaginary lottery garage) as the smaller car just works better as a package on our roads

Jon_S_Rally

4,508 posts

119 months

Monday 15th August 2022
quotequote all
I'm still struggling a bit with the rear end styling of the 992, but I'd happily have either of these to be honest. The fact the GT3 is available as a manual might swing it, but they're both stunning in reality.

esotericar

745 posts

58 months

Monday 15th August 2022
quotequote all
Maccmike8 said:
The engine must surely be sealed from the driver? IVA wise its a must due to fumes etc.
Yeah, that's what I thought, too.

esotericar

745 posts

58 months

Monday 15th August 2022
quotequote all
stuckmojo said:
s2000db said:
For the ‘actual’ price you’ll pay for either of these (overs on a second hand car, or the depreciation on a dozen Cayennes), there are much better cars available.
For the sticker price alone… yup they’re remarkable!
That's it. At the nonexistent sticker price, they are phenomenal. At the racket price these are flipped for, no.
The mark ups are silly. But if you want an NA driver's car, what is actually better for the same price as the inflated overs? There are faster cars available. But IMO not better cars.

NGK210

5,102 posts

176 months

Monday 15th August 2022
quotequote all
Great vid. Nicely shot. Well articulated.
thumbup

ReverendCounter

6,087 posts

207 months

Monday 15th August 2022
quotequote all
Oh look, another Porsche advertorial, hasn't been once since the day before yesterday. So Porsche don't see a good ROI on Sunday ads?

bosshog

1,800 posts

307 months

Monday 15th August 2022
quotequote all
Dammit Porsche, wish you'd take my money.

Mysstree

547 posts

77 months

Monday 15th August 2022
quotequote all
bosshog said:
Dammit Porsche, wish you'd take my money.
Buy some open back mens underwear.
Go to Porsche main dealer.
Plonk cash on table.
Lower trousers.
Bend over desk.

Simples biggrin

cayman-black

13,268 posts

247 months

Monday 15th August 2022
quotequote all
Mysstree said:
bosshog said:
Dammit Porsche, wish you'd take my money.
Buy some open back mens underwear.
Go to Porsche main dealer.
Plonk cash on table.
Lower trousers.
Bend over desk.

Simples biggrin
Boss tried that , didnt work! laugh

Jon_S_Rally

4,508 posts

119 months

Monday 15th August 2022
quotequote all
ReverendCounter said:
Oh look, another Porsche advertorial, hasn't been once since the day before yesterday. So Porsche don't see a good ROI on Sunday ads?
If it bothers you that much, don't read/watch it.

I don't think it should be a surprise that a website aimed at car enthusiasts is running features on two of the most desirable enthusiasts' cars of the last year.