Holy $hit !! 10 meg and no CAP !! YEAH !!
Holy $hit !! 10 meg and no CAP !! YEAH !!
Author
Discussion

nick heppinstall

Original Poster:

9,083 posts

310 months

Thursday 11th August 2005
quotequote all
http://www.blueyonder.co.uk/blueyonder/getContent.jspx?page=bbs_evenfaster

Good old Telewest. Can't wait !

_dobbo_

14,619 posts

278 months

Thursday 11th August 2005
quotequote all
Only of course assuming your exchange can support that kind of speed. Mine can't.

Don Veloci

2,203 posts

311 months

Thursday 11th August 2005
quotequote all
I'm a telwest phone only customer at the moment.

I'm looking to install broadband for work & personal use once I get a machine at home to take advantage (work supplied - I can hope)

I take telewest broadband service is quite good and reliable then?

I was considering ditching them for a BT line.

trevorw

2,875 posts

312 months

Thursday 11th August 2005
quotequote all
_dobbo_ said:
Only of course assuming your exchange can support that kind of speed. Mine can't.


Its cable, not via telephone points.


Good new, so i'll be up to 4mb connection, pah just as i'm gonna be moving to a NThell area aswell.

page3

5,193 posts

281 months

Friday 12th August 2005
quotequote all
Shame the upload is pathetically slow

squirrelz

1,186 posts

301 months

Friday 12th August 2005
quotequote all
what, 384k? as opposed to the 256k that you get with ADSL?

Yes it would be nice to have 10mb in both directions, but that aint gonna happen with current technology.

DanL

6,587 posts

295 months

Friday 12th August 2005
quotequote all
squirrelz said:
what, 384k? as opposed to the 256k that you get with ADSL?

Yes it would be nice to have 10mb in both directions, but that aint gonna happen with current technology.
Pretty sure the reason the upload bandwidth is capped is because they don't want people running websites/webservers from their home boxes...

Dan

mcflurry

9,190 posts

283 months

Friday 12th August 2005
quotequote all
...and if you ask Telewest nicely they might upgrade your 2mb to 4mb line free of charge until the 10mb kicks in

rico

7,917 posts

285 months

Friday 12th August 2005
quotequote all
I've had to cancel my Bulldog 4mbps in London as I've moved (which is bloody hard... cancelling that is... ) but they offered me 8mbps for just £17.99/month.

Blooooody good value

x1m

5,889 posts

257 months

Friday 12th August 2005
quotequote all
Sorry lads.

www.bethere.co.uk/index.html

Am on the waiting list for this. I win.

page3

5,193 posts

281 months

Friday 12th August 2005
quotequote all
DanL said:

squirrelz said:
what, 384k? as opposed to the 256k that you get with ADSL?

Yes it would be nice to have 10mb in both directions, but that aint gonna happen with current technology.

Pretty sure the reason the upload bandwidth is capped is because they don't want people running websites/webservers from their home boxes...

Dan
As squirrelz says its a technical issue with cable

Why cannot customers run a web server? - I means its a perfectly good use for an internet connection. And what about VOIP, Web-cams, Gaming, Radio streaming, P2P etc - all perfectly good reasons for faster upload bandwidth.

If the customer wants the bandwidth then the ISP should sell it to them

pdV6

16,442 posts

291 months

Friday 12th August 2005
quotequote all
Cool - I'll have a faster connection at home than I do at work!

viper_larry

4,376 posts

286 months

Friday 12th August 2005
quotequote all
NTL announced earlier this week they'll be providing 10Mb links to all customers starting with the 3mb custimers first - then all by end 2006

miniandy

1,512 posts

267 months

Friday 12th August 2005
quotequote all
Then they'll merge with Telewest in 2007!

-DeaDLocK-

3,368 posts

281 months

Friday 12th August 2005
quotequote all
page3 said:
As squirrelz says its a technical issue with cable
Incorrect (unless I'm misinformed).

ADSL by definition (asymmetric) incurs a higher bandwidth downstream than upstream.

With cable (fibre optic cable capable of FAR MORE data transmission than your 100Mbps card is capable of carrying), there is no such inherent limitation.

There may be a limitation with the routing hardware or the way the software is set-up at the server end, but the technology itself is more than capable of supporting ridiculous downstream AND upstream speeds.

What has been said is correct: the reason upstream speed is limited is to prevent the usage of the line for commercial purposes (because as a home user on a home contract, that is expressly forbidden). They don't want you running webservers and the like on the network.

If you want a bigger up pipe, you have to pay for it like business do.

page3

5,193 posts

281 months

Saturday 13th August 2005
quotequote all
-DeaDLocK- said:
What has been said is correct: the reason upstream speed is limited is to prevent the usage of the line for commercial purposes (because as a home user on a home contract, that is expressly forbidden). They don't want you running webservers and the like on the network.

If you want a bigger up pipe, you have to pay for it like business do.
Sorry but I believe that is a very narrow viewpoint. Wanting faster upload doesn't necessarily mean business use. As stated before there are many reasons for wanting faster upload all of which fit into a 'home use' definition.

I am very aware of the benefits of business broadband and agree with you that uses requiring that functionality should pay for it.