RE: Is the F512 M the most underrated Ferrari?
RE: Is the F512 M the most underrated Ferrari?
Tuesday 27th September 2022

Is the F512 M the most underrated Ferrari?

Whether you love its looks or loathe them, the flat-12 F512 M earned its place in the history books


The Ferrari F512 M might just be the most polarising production car to come out of Maranello. (Well, until the Purosangue came along, of course.) When the covers came off the revamped Testarossa at the 1994 Paris Motor Show, people were instantly taken aback by the lack of pop-up headlights, the removal of the body-wide strakes at the rear and those canted five-spoke wheels. 

A shame, really, because it clouded the idea that the F512 M played an important role in the Ferrari story. Not only was this the last chapter in the iconic Testarossa lineage, but it would also prove to be the final setting for Ferrari’s flat-12 engine in a production car. To send off the Testarossa in style, Ferrari introduced a raft of updates for the F512 M – or ‘Modificata’. On the engine side, the 4.9-litre flat-12 was fitted with titanium con rods, forged aluminium pistons and a new crankshaft, bringing the total output up to 440hp – 13hp more than its 512 TR predecessor. Of course, that was all managed exclusively through a five-speed (gated) manual, with a 0-62mph time of 4.7 seconds possible if you got your shifts right. That’s impressive by today’s standards, let alone in the mid-1990s. 

The, er, controversial redesign was also functional. Well, as functional as you can make a giant, two-metre-wide wedge. When in use, the new fixed headlights were more aerodynamically efficient than the old pop-up lights, and those cantered 18-inch wheels are both lighter and, allegedly, aided brake cooling. Those aforementioned engine upgrades also played a part in reducing weight, as did a fruity stainless steel exhaust system. Throw in a few minor interior tweaks and the F512 M was a significant step forward from its predecessors, yet retained that distinctly Testarossa silhouette – so long as you only look at it from the side. 

Whereas the Testarossa and 512 TR sold in the thousands, the F512 M was limited to just 501 examples. And given that there have only been four mid-engine, twelve-cylinder flagships (F50, Enzo, LaFerrari and Daytona SP3) since the F512 M, it’s a wonder that values have yet to breach the seven-figure mark. Perhaps it’s the car’s grand tourer reputation, or that people have yet to come around to its cross-era design. Regardless, when this particular example - one of just 41 UK cars - appeared in the classifieds, we decided to call in at DK Engineering to see if the F512 M really qualifies as one of the most underrated cars ever to come out of Maranello.


See the full ad here

Author
Discussion

ballans

Original Poster:

939 posts

135 months

Tuesday 27th September 2022
quotequote all
There’s a whole industry dedicated to backdating Porsches so surprised no one has given one of these the same treatment.
Change the front & rear lights and wheels to the older style and you have a great looking Testarossa.

Mark_Blanchard

1,044 posts

285 months

Tuesday 27th September 2022
quotequote all
It might be a great car, but I've never been able to get past those daft headlamps and 355 copy and past grill.
The earlier 512 TR looked a great car, maybe they should have stopped it there.

Gad-Westy

16,624 posts

243 months

Tuesday 27th September 2022
quotequote all
Mark_Blanchard said:
It might be a great car, but I've never been able to get past those daft headlamps and 355 copy and past grill.
The earlier 512 TR looked a great car, maybe they should have stopped it there.
I had a great big Athena poster of a 512M on my wall when growing up so it always had a place in my heart but as you grow older you develop some taste! Would always be the 512TR for me now.

cayman-black

13,268 posts

246 months

Tuesday 27th September 2022
quotequote all
Fabulous!

Six Potter

5,987 posts

243 months

Tuesday 27th September 2022
quotequote all
The cosmetic changes ruined the design purity of the Tesstarossa, but the mechanical developments made for better driving car if I recall.

I'd rather a Tesstarossa as a garage queen to cast my gaze over and drive at 40mph to car shows in the summer, and something much cheaper to generally thrash and drive the wheel off of.

satfinal

2,625 posts

192 months

Tuesday 27th September 2022
quotequote all
A bit of an awkward crossover in design language for Ferrari imo. It's not hideous though, just awkward looking.

Dapster

9,566 posts

210 months

Tuesday 27th September 2022
quotequote all
The 512 TR was such a beautiful starting point. How did they tit up the redesign so badly?


Gad-Westy

16,624 posts

243 months

Tuesday 27th September 2022
quotequote all
satfinal said:
A bit of an awkward crossover in design language for Ferrari imo. It's not hideous though, just awkward looking.
That's definitely the issue. Very mid 90's front end stuck on where it has no right to be. To me the 512TR was the perfect rounding off of the iconic Testarossa lines and brought it fairly up to date in the early 90's in a very similar way to the Esprit's reworking. The 512M seemed like a bit of a desperate attempt to flog just a few more until the 550 arrived. I seem to remember reading at the time that it was appreciably better to drive than the 512TR though.

Krikkit

27,938 posts

211 months

Tuesday 27th September 2022
quotequote all
Mark_Blanchard said:
It might be a great car, but I've never been able to get past those daft headlamps and 355 copy and past grill.
The earlier 512 TR looked a great car, maybe they should have stopped it there.
Same here, 512TR is the absolute king of this generation imho.

dibblecorse

7,644 posts

222 months

Tuesday 27th September 2022
quotequote all
Its all been said above .... this just doesn't really work, its like the awkward cousin that the fit girls take out with them to make them look more attractive !!!

nofitstate

10 posts

72 months

Tuesday 27th September 2022
quotequote all
It's a very awkward looking design. The front end really looks like an aftermarket update kit.

cerb4.5lee

45,080 posts

210 months

Tuesday 27th September 2022
quotequote all
Dapster said:
The 512 TR was such a beautiful starting point. How did they tit up the redesign so badly?

That picture really does highlight how ugly this is in comparison to the previous cars for sure. Other than the looks though this car definitely appeals to me. There is just something special about a manual gated Ferrari I reckon.

I'd still buy a Lamborghini over a Ferrari if I had the money though!

Schermerhorn

4,353 posts

219 months

Tuesday 27th September 2022
quotequote all
The 512 TR was the Ferrari Testarossa sweetspot.

The F512M looks like it was upgraded quickly and on a very tight budget.

WCZ

11,559 posts

224 months

Tuesday 27th September 2022
quotequote all
the front is perfect!

Motormatt

508 posts

248 months

Tuesday 27th September 2022
quotequote all
The technical tweaks and an extra 13hp will not have elevated the driving experience any way near enough to compensate for the styling changes that have basically ruined one of the most iconic designs of the era, the treatment at the rear is particularly bad.

This car has covered less than 700 miles a year so definitely something to look at rather than drive, in which case the TR or earlier Testarossa are both superior.

But such is the way with collecting classic Ferraris, chances are the buyer will have all three.


McAndy

16,840 posts

207 months

Tuesday 27th September 2022
quotequote all
I'd like to see the M bonnet and lights on a TR. I could take than on either TR or Testarossa alloys. Underpinnings can be all M, from my memory of road tests at the time.

Limpet

6,627 posts

191 months

Tuesday 27th September 2022
quotequote all
Wonderful car (and I'd happily give one garage room), but it was an unfortunate collision of two generations of styling that didn't really work.

Not enough to put me off wanting one though smile

varsas

4,076 posts

232 months

Tuesday 27th September 2022
quotequote all
OK, I'll be the first. It's not a flat-12, it's a 180 degree V12.

The pistons share a crankpin, instead of having them on a common one as per 'proper' flat engines. You could say it's a non-boxer flat 12, but it's easier to call it a 180 degree V12.

Muzzer79

13,206 posts

217 months

Tuesday 27th September 2022
quotequote all
I think it's the wheels that bother me. They're just not attractive.

The rest of the styling is fine and it's essentially the most modern and refined Testarossa.

Wheels are easily changed, although if it was my 300 large, it would probably be going into a good 512TR if I was that way inclined.

Six Potter

5,987 posts

243 months

Tuesday 27th September 2022
quotequote all
Muzzer79 said:
I think it's the wheels that bother me. They're just not attractive.
Yeah I've always thought they are a bit weird looking on these. They appear to be split rims, which can look great on period cars when they have a decent bit of dish, but I don't like how the spokes protrude on this set.

As a general rule I prefer to see wheels with some dish on super/hyper cars, otherwise wheels that are very flat faced can look a bit hatchbacky, IMHO.