RE: Jaguar S-Type 2.7 XS | Shed of the Week
RE: Jaguar S-Type 2.7 XS | Shed of the Week
Friday 14th October 2022

Jaguar S-Type 2.7 XS | Shed of the Week

Big range, high esteem, minuscule money


This week's under-£1,500 titbit, a Jaguar S-Type 2.7 XS, has got Shed thinking about the good old days and how car styling mods can affect perceptions. Shed's first styling efforts involved fitting two strips of chequered flag tape to the sides of his 1961 Austin Mini. He later moved on to brushed-on matt black paint for the roof and a set of aftermarket Extendaswitches. These items allowed him to operate the Mini's dash toggle switches for the wipers and lights without having to stop and undo his static seat belt first. Extendaswitches look ludicrous now but they were cool back in the 1960s. 

Of course, no matter what Shed did to his Mini, and he ended up doing a lot to it, everybody knew it was still just a Mini. Now let's move on to the limited edition Jaguar S-Type XS. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder and all that, but to Shed's worn-out peepers the XS is a fascinating insight into how differently things might have worked out for the S-Type if only Jaguar had kicked it off with this mean and moody gangster look instead of the bowler-hatted image they went for. 

Positioned between the S and Sport models the XS was first released in early 2006 in a desperate attempt to tempt exec car buyers away from BMW showrooms. It had Sport suspension, 18in Mercury alloys, a Sport pack bodykit with bright-mesh grilles front and rear, boot spoiler and side skirts, double-stitched charcoal leather and aluminium Sport trim, a Sport steering wheel, and Comfort and Technology packs incorporating sat nav, voice activation, front and rear park distance control, rain-sensing wipers and electrochromic mirrors. It came in a choice of five classy colours: Indigo, Lunar Grey, Liquid Silver, and two sorts of black, Midnight or Ebony. Engine-wise it could be ordered with the 235hp 3.0 petrol V6 or the 207hp twin-turbo 2.7 V6 diesel that had been added to the S-Type range in 2004. 

Admittedly the XS wasn't cheap at £30,995 for the 3.0 petrol or £31,995 for the 2.7 (diesels were in their pomp back then), but in Shed's view those BMW buyers missed out. The post-2004 facelift S-Type was a fine car. In Shed's possibly worthless opinion, the 2.7 diesel version was not only the best S-Type by far but one of the best Jaguar all-rounders ever. 

All right, wipe the porridge off your screen. There's a reason why these 2.7s haven't appeared in SOTW up to now, and it's not just because they've all failed their MOTs either (although many have). Their 0-62 time of 8.1sec might not sound earth-shattering but 321lb ft at 1,900rpm was more than the contemporary 4.2 V8 Jaguar was putting out. The 2.7 was a smooth, fast, quiet, and highly effective touring tool with excellent mid-range squirt. You could get it with a six-speed manual, but that box's combination of a heavy clutch pedal and too-short ratios meant that the six-speed ZF 6HP26 auto – also used in the Aston DB9, DBS V12 and Rapide, the first Rolls-Royce Phantoms, and ironically many BMWs from the 7 to the 3 Series – was your best bet. 

Another 200 XSs were fed into the UK market in autumn 2006 but it was too late. Shunned examples like our shed were still being registered well into 2007, which turned out to be the last year of S-Type production. Shed can't tell from his own porridge-encrusted Amstrad screen which of the two blacks this car is painted in. If you possess superior viewing technology, which wouldn't be difficult, Midnight was a bluey-black metallic whereas Ebony was a solid black that wasn't highly recommended by Jaguar dealers on account of its vulnerability to scratches.

The MOT report is no help here because it just says 'black'. More usefully though it tells us that the last test in June was a clean pass, just like the two before it, and that what advisories there have been over the last ten years have been almost exclusively minor consumables. Fearing the worst, Shed uncharacteristically got his wallet out for a vehicle report. This showed nothing at all to worry about on the scrapped/damaged/written off/dodgy mileage front. He is now trying to get his report money back. 

S-Types obviously rust, and they go through suspension components for fun, but, on the positive side, the 2.7's average fuel consumption of 41mpg will give you a potential range of over 620 miles from the 15-gallon-plus tank. Even the vehicle tax isn't too burdensome at £290. Could be top Le Mans transport for you and three buddies, if you have that many.


See the full ad here

Author
Discussion

I would rather be sailing

Original Poster:

65 posts

90 months

Friday 14th October 2022
quotequote all
I'm first

anonymous-user

84 months

Friday 14th October 2022
quotequote all
I had a 2004 S-Type soot chucker when it was a relatively new car, and it drove well but I always felt that the engine needed another 50bhp or so, which of course it got in the 3.0 version in the XF. 200bhp just isn't enough for more than mooching in a car this heavy, and that tacky body kit is writing cheques the engine certainly can't cash in this example.

Mr Tidy

31,736 posts

157 months

Friday 14th October 2022
quotequote all
For some reason I've always liked these S-Types, although I thought the first generation looked better.

From time to time I do search for 3 litre petrol manuals. rolleyes

Maybe it's because I haven't owned a Jaguar yet so it's a potential itch to scratch?

But 204bhp in a car that size seems a bit under-powered - my 123d had 201bhp!

Jeanboi

2,856 posts

249 months

Friday 14th October 2022
quotequote all
I never liked the S or the X type Jags. This S type was so 'blobby' looking.
No elegance there.

Mr Tidy

31,736 posts

157 months

Friday 14th October 2022
quotequote all
Well our tastes all vary!

I prefer the S-Type to the XF, and the last generation XJ just looks like a minger.

pSyCoSiS

4,331 posts

235 months

Friday 14th October 2022
quotequote all
That's actually a decent Shed. Not too keen on the S Type, but have always liked these XS models with their body kit and wheels.

The 2.7 diesel isn't the most reliable of engines, but if this is running right and maintained properly, then it's worth a punt at under £1500. I had this 2.7 in a 2006 XJ, and it pulled that car well and returned over 50 mpg (that was a aluminium body, to be fair).

SirGriffin

259 posts

98 months

Friday 14th October 2022
quotequote all
Having loathed diesels for most of my motoring history, I have a renewed interest in them given my current "desperation" shed has a Massey Ferguson clattering away under the bonnet.

I was very impressed with the delicious sounding S-type diesel that whispered into a parking space recently, every bit the refined engine it's rivals were. Personally I'm not a fan of the "get rid of the wood and chrome to attract the yoofs" look.

Such a shame the S-type is so looked down upon, mine was a 2.5 petrol and was very nice, getting lots of positive comments.

Try one before dismissing them.

PSB1967

503 posts

186 months

Friday 14th October 2022
quotequote all
It must have at least 1 turbo, thus only a map away from a power hike. But the pics are somewhat fuzzy and low grade with poor lighting. I bet they are done so as to hide much paint issues. It also doesn't have a satnav (that makes two maps missing), so is it a real XS? Shame 'cos I quite like it.

Nsuro80

40 posts

95 months

Friday 14th October 2022
quotequote all
Lovin' the cows on that cormorant

fruitoftheloon

93 posts

64 months

Friday 14th October 2022
quotequote all
I remem being interested in one of these a good while ago, I am not particularly tall (5 ft 10), I got comfy in the front seat.

Then went to check the remaining toe-room in the back, I wouldn't even have been able to get in the space 'left', so that a was a big no, as in, where the hell had all the space gone??

2smoke

233 posts

141 months

Friday 14th October 2022
quotequote all
I would rather be sailing said:
I'm first
First in comments, last in life..

As for the car, you could do a lot worse for £1500. Would be a nice place to smoke around in for a year.

Bill

58,822 posts

285 months

Friday 14th October 2022
quotequote all
Great shed! FWIW I much prefer this to the chrome etc tartan rug look they normally have.

Jordie Barretts sock

6,018 posts

49 months

Friday 14th October 2022
quotequote all
Yes, yes and yes!

That is lush! So much want, zero need.

Alorotom

12,788 posts

217 months

Friday 14th October 2022
quotequote all
Definite st220 theme/clone in my eyes - no idea if that’s OEM or not (can’t recall seeing one kitted like this before - but they aren’t the most memorable of motors)

Between the body kit and the wheels (and the price) this is destined for a council estate near you soon.

Looks well presented in all fairness though.

V88Dicky

7,373 posts

213 months

Friday 14th October 2022
quotequote all
We had an S-Type (same reg BJ07) with the XS body kit and trim between 2010 and 2013. It never put a foot wrong and gave us sterling service.
(Un)fortunately? it didn’t have the Peugeot / Ford 2.7 oil burner under the bonnet, instead the 4.2 AJV8, an absolute peach of an engine.

Iirc the 2.7 had some major issues that were mostly resolved with the 3.0. Turbo issues?

Dombilano

1,465 posts

85 months

Friday 14th October 2022
quotequote all
Nice shed

parabolica

7,018 posts

214 months

Friday 14th October 2022
quotequote all
Second S-type SOTW after this one earlier in the year - someone at PH towers must like them. Prefer this one to the earlier one but would probably still look elsewhere.

richinlondon

900 posts

152 months

Friday 14th October 2022
quotequote all
Gangsta in a trilby.........

yme402

668 posts

132 months

Friday 14th October 2022
quotequote all
A lot of flash for the money. Cracking shed this week, although no mention of Mrs Shed?

J4CKO

46,991 posts

230 months

Friday 14th October 2022
quotequote all
richinlondon said:
Gangsta in a trilby.........
Yeah, like this ?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hIUKRVKG-0s

Good shed, might be my age but the S type has grown on me and that looks half decent for £1500.