RE: Jaw-dropping Eagle Speedster for sale
RE: Jaw-dropping Eagle Speedster for sale
Sunday 20th November 2022

Jaw-dropping Eagle Speedster for sale

You'll wait years for a new Eagle build; time to swoop in on one it finished earlier  


Years before the current restomodding craze, Eagle was very successfully doing its thing. Henry Pearman founded the company almost 40 years ago, with the simple aim of making the iconic E-Type as good as it could be. In fact, Eagle has been remanufacturing E-Types since 1991, meaning there are more than 30 years of experience in optimising the most famous Jaguar of them all. So it’s become quite good at that…

To spend five minutes on Eagle’s website is to lose an hour learning about E-Types. Because there’s not just one kind of Eagle, with everything available from a 4,000-hour, zero-mile restoration that closely resembles the original, to the more exotic recent projects like the Lightweight and Low Drag GTs. It’s the Speedster that’s perhaps the most famous of all the Eagle products, combining the obsessively optimised running gear with a beautifully reworked hot rod exterior. Once upon a time, it was intended to be unique for an American customer, but such was the response that Eagle decided to build a few more. ‘Few’ really is the operative word - the advert for this one suggests it’s the sixth Speedster made. Of six.

There are beautiful details throughout any Speedster, from the lowered and raked windscreen to the narrowed rear plate surround that allows US or UK plate to squeeze in. The attention to detail is off the scale, with the handbrake hidden under the cubby lid to clean up the dash and the aluminium centre console sculpted to flow into the body-coloured ‘waterfall’ between the seats. Like all the very best restomods, the Eagle E-Type is instantly familiar as the classic you know, yet also better in every single way.

This one was specced in what is now considered the trademark Speedster colour scheme, with Eagle Black Cognac paint contrasted against Speedster Red leather. Which looks as stunning today as it ever did. Like all the Speedsters, it’s powered by Eagle’s evolution of the Jaguar legendary straight six, with 4.7 litres and more than 310hp. With a quoted kerbweight of 985kg and a five-speed gearbox in place of the four, an Eagle E-Type is way faster than standard. As well as being better built, better looking, better-to-drive…

Of course, you know all this about the Eagle Speedster, but sometimes some things are worth repeating. As they all are, this one is extra special: once a 1967 Series 1 E-Type (complete with Jaguar Heritage Trust certificate to prove it), it’s now Eagle’s highest specification Speedster ever. With the GT, Sport and Supersport options added on to the build, the first buyer spent an additional £163,000 on top of whatever a Speedster commission costs in the first instance. Predictably enough, it’s superb in every single way.

Now Speedster six of six is for sale, with just 738 miles under its bespoke wheels since Eagle worked its magic. This means it looks like it’s just been finished and, heaven’s above, that Speedster spell remains compelling. Wherever the next owner ends up in this, there’s surely not going to be a more stylish car around. Which must make the price of admission - surely a seven-figure one - worth every single penny, before even driving a mile.


See the original advert here

Author
Discussion

SydneyBridge

Original Poster:

11,861 posts

188 months

Sunday 20th November 2022
quotequote all
Absolutely stunning

Arsecati

2,785 posts

147 months

Sunday 20th November 2022
quotequote all
Dear god, that is beautiful.

Robertb

3,901 posts

268 months

Sunday 20th November 2022
quotequote all
I think it looks over-wheeled and the screen looks too low.

I’d prefer a lightly enhanced Eagle.

ChocolateFrog

34,954 posts

203 months

Sunday 20th November 2022
quotequote all
Robertb said:
I think it looks over-wheeled and the screen looks too low.

I’d prefer a lightly enhanced Eagle.
It's like criticising a mole on a supermodel but I know what you mean. 1 or 2 inches smaller on the wheels and 3 or 4 onto the windscreen and it would look spot on to me and would be more useable, although that's irrelevant when it won't be used.

Draxindustries1

1,657 posts

53 months

Sunday 20th November 2022
quotequote all
Just a replica like all these recreations. Why not design something unique rather than try to emulate an E type which it isn't.
The bodywork is nothing like a genuine E type nor is the suspension, wheels & especially the track which is far too wide.
This kind of money is far better spent on the genuine article..

thundercolo

88 posts

202 months

Sunday 20th November 2022
quotequote all
The Low Drag GT is my favourite car ever. I'd rather have one of these than a Singer

993kimbo

3,003 posts

215 months

Sunday 20th November 2022
quotequote all
They were filming one near where I live a couple of Summers ago. Either the driver was very tall or the windscreen too low because he was looking over the windscreen rather than through it. A bit like Noddy.

It didn't sound that good, either.

Edited by 993kimbo on Sunday 20th November 10:05

ggdrew

267 posts

154 months

Sunday 20th November 2022
quotequote all
993kimbo said:
They were filming one near where I live a couple of Summers ago. Either the driver was very tall or the windscreen too low because he was looking over the windscreen rather than through it. A bit like Noddy.
This! Its telling that there's no pic of it with a driver, it will look 'off'. The low screen accentuates the wheel size, but I like the wheels (albeit I love the original wheel/body also).

I dislike the middle of the upper body where the screen pillars and door tops are all in body colour - the brightwork adds important highlights to the car, so makes it look like a moulded GRP kit car to my eyes:

Slowlygettingit

947 posts

71 months

Sunday 20th November 2022
quotequote all
I can’t square the time and cost of whoever commissioned it against the ridiculously low mileage before moving it on.

Although I’m guessing the speedster is too impractical to do any touring or long jaunts

Draxindustries1

1,657 posts

53 months

Sunday 20th November 2022
quotequote all
Slowlygettingit said:
Although I’m guessing the speedster is too impractical to do any touring or long jaunts
Anyone over around 5'8" will look ridiculous in it.
Goggles would be compulsory with wind/ grit blast plus a bucket for bailing in a downpour..


Iamnotkloot

1,915 posts

177 months

Sunday 20th November 2022
quotequote all
thundercolo said:
The Low Drag GT is my favourite car ever. I'd rather have one of these than a Singer
Snap! They are fantastic, though this Speedster is nice too.

As for the peeps saying the windscreen is too low for any use, didn’t Henry Catchpole drive one for Evo and, despite being about 6 ft 5, he loved it.

DevonPaul

1,751 posts

167 months

Sunday 20th November 2022
quotequote all
If I was going to splash 7 figures on a replica, it wouldn't be on a LHD version of an old Jag that I could pick a nice one up for 10% of the cost. And to spend that and then not drive it???

I don't really get these 'restomod' things - the charm of a classic car is the quirks. Sure a few small tweaks to improve reliability, but the extent of the renovations to make them drive like a modern car is pointless. Different engine, gearbox, suspension, brakes, retrim, about the only thing the same is the silhouette, and even that is often modified.

May as well go the whole hog and just rebody a Tesla.

Bemmer

1,195 posts

232 months

Sunday 20th November 2022
quotequote all
Draxindustries1 said:
This kind of money is far better spent on the genuine article..
I haven't seen how much it is.....?

Jon556

431 posts

56 months

Sunday 20th November 2022
quotequote all
Is this Simon Cowell’s one?

Dombilano

1,463 posts

85 months

Sunday 20th November 2022
quotequote all
Replica? How can something be a replica of something, when it already is what you're accusing it of being a replica of?

It's an enhancement of 60s classic, utterly gorgeous

Tom4398cc

569 posts

64 months

Sunday 20th November 2022
quotequote all
Err, PistonHeads, are you allowing yourselves to be led by commercial considerations over journalistic integrity? Isn’t this the car dealer that has generated many, many pages of unfavourable comment on PH?

I’m just going to start a stop watch to see how long it is before this post is deleted and I get banned from PH……..

wpa1975

14,784 posts

144 months

Sunday 20th November 2022
quotequote all
Dombilano said:
Replica? How can something be a replica of something, when it already is what you're accusing it of being a replica of?

It's an enhancement of 60s classic, utterly gorgeous
Agreed, it is stunning

TerryFarquit

113 posts

157 months

Sunday 20th November 2022
quotequote all
It looks a bit cut’n’shut where the doors meet the rear haunches.

Jon556

431 posts

56 months

Sunday 20th November 2022
quotequote all
Tom4398cc said:
Err, PistonHeads, are you allowing yourselves to be led by commercial considerations over journalistic integrity? Isn’t this the car dealer that has generated many, many pages of unfavourable comment on PH?

I’m just going to start a stop watch to see how long it is before this post is deleted and I get banned from PH……..
No, that’s Tommy two-phones Snr, this is Jnr. Which, whilst apples may not fall far, is not like “listen to me, clever prick” Snr.

Tom4398cc

569 posts

64 months

Sunday 20th November 2022
quotequote all
Thanks Jon556. I’m pleased to stand corrected.