Microsoft strikes again...
Microsoft strikes again...
Author
Discussion

scared but happy

Original Poster:

24,147 posts

258 months

Wednesday 17th August 2005
quotequote all
http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,31500-13411878,00.html

Amazing dont you think? Next Microsoft proves they invented the internet/cars and life.
(I recon it down to WMA technology - ie mp3 rip off).

but going by this article
http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,31500-1192482,00.html

perhaps its not a bad thing after all.

Podie

46,649 posts

304 months

Wednesday 17th August 2005
quotequote all
Sounds more like someone at Apple should get the boot... that's a major f**k up.

As for the tinitus thing... that's been going on since Walkmans came out...

rico

7,917 posts

284 months

Wednesday 17th August 2005
quotequote all
scared but happy said:
www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,31500-13411878,00.html

Amazing dont you think? Next Microsoft proves they invented the internet/cars and life.
(I recon it down to WMA technology - ie mp3 rip off).


From that article it seemed that Apple launched a product without patenting it?!?

scared but happy said:

but going by this article
www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,31500-1192482,00.html

perhaps its not a bad thing after all.


But surely this is the same for Discman etc users? They're blaming the iPod just because its very popular and lots of people use it.

scorp

8,783 posts

258 months

Wednesday 17th August 2005
quotequote all
WMA isnt a MP3 rip-off.

scared but happy

Original Poster:

24,147 posts

258 months

Wednesday 17th August 2005
quotequote all
scorp said:
WMA isnt a MP3 rip-off.

Sorry what I ment was a re-invent the wheel time. Due to licensing restrictions?

parrot of doom

23,075 posts

263 months

Wednesday 17th August 2005
quotequote all
As someone who thinks the whole iPod music thing is a gigantic ripoff, I laughed at this.

Serves them right for ripping the consumer off.

Bodo

12,596 posts

295 months

Wednesday 17th August 2005
quotequote all
Trivial patents are a ripoff anyway. Best idea is to register a few dozen trivial patents yourself, maintain them silently, and then mandate some zealot lawyer that rips the p*ss out of other zealot commercial patent holders that infringed one of your patents for years.

Size Nine Elm

5,167 posts

313 months

Wednesday 17th August 2005
quotequote all
Bodo said:
Trivial patents are a ripoff anyway. Best idea is to register a few dozen trivial patents yourself, maintain them silently, and then mandate some zealot lawyer that rips the p*ss out of other zealot commercial patent holders that infringed one of your patents for years.


Unisys LZW? (gif file compression amongst others)

Amazon 'one click' patent?

Load of bollox... or should I say ' a system with a plurality of spheroidal components...'

>> Edited by Size Nine Elm on Wednesday 17th August 19:07

alexkp

16,484 posts

273 months

Wednesday 17th August 2005
quotequote all
Hang on, I thought Microsoft own a large chunk of Apple?

scared but happy

Original Poster:

24,147 posts

258 months

Wednesday 17th August 2005
quotequote all
Stupid. All the patent is over is :

www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D8C12SSG2.htm?campaign_id=apn_tech_up&chan=tc

The jog wheel interface and thats it (unless I missed something)

>> Edited by scared but happy on Wednesday 17th August 20:50

cyberface

12,214 posts

286 months

Wednesday 17th August 2005
quotequote all
?? Where did you get the 40% drop figure from? Apple stock is doing pretty well - I sold all of mine when they announced the Intel transition (on the basis that nobody would buy Powerbooks until the *much* faster Yonahs turn up) and have been proved badly wrong.

The concepts behind the iPod aren't rocket science, yet again it's the Apple industrial design that made it popular (and, of course, the marketing).

(disclaimer: I have been described as a Mac zealot from time to time)

scared but happy

Original Poster:

24,147 posts

258 months

Wednesday 17th August 2005
quotequote all
- what planet am I on? I take the plummeting share back I did NOT read the date of the news posting as it was intertwined with a current news feed.

__Lee__

7,520 posts

272 months

Wednesday 17th August 2005
quotequote all
I think its all very amusing.

Apple have really dropped the ball lately with Tiger and all of its bugs.

Nobody needs to pay over the top prices for a smart looking machine anymore.

Why pay twice the cost for something that has a large amount of problems and has massive compatibility issues when you can get a PC that's looks at least as good, if not better in some cases and which costs less than half the price?.

I have always been a big fan of Mac's, especially when PC's looked very dull but can't really see any point in them beyond publishing at the moment.

Bodo

12,596 posts

295 months

Wednesday 17th August 2005
quotequote all
Size Nine Elm said:
Unisys LZW? (gif file compression amongst others)

Amazon 'one click' patent?
yay!
Looks like LZW has expired now.

I've just patented "thread hijacking"

Oi, you with the smug face in the last row! You gotta pay licence fees for that!

cyberface

12,214 posts

286 months

Wednesday 17th August 2005
quotequote all
^^ Lee - ought to resist but I can't.

Are you currently using their hardware and have run Panther for a while, and are currently using Tiger? My experience is that the system is the dog's bollox.

Tiger broke a few third party hack-type apps that mess with the UI, along with some kernel extensions (notably MS Virtual PC network switch) but, apart from the now-patched Dashboard exploit, has been not only stable but much faster on all of my Macs (5, from old stuff to brand new stuff).

They're still selling Powerbooks FFS, even though the Intel CPU replacement plan should have killed the market instantly. Looks like geeks aren't the main market and people still pay for a fully integrated design.

Yeah OS X is (IMO) very cool, but the extreme Linux fanboys and some MSers can point out big flaws in it. However, even with these flaws, people are still buying hardware that *massively* underperforms compared to similarly priced PC kit (apart from top-spec dual G5s)...

If the 'slow as ' Macs are still selling, then when they're using the same CPUs as Alienware et al, surely it's only going to get better? (unless they up the machines of course).

I just want 6 hours battery life and a top-speed P-M in my 12" Powerbook. That is all :dream-on:

__Lee__

7,520 posts

272 months

Wednesday 17th August 2005
quotequote all
cyberface said:
^^ Lee - ought to resist but I can't.

Are you currently using their hardware and have run Panther for a while, and are currently using Tiger? My experience is that the system is the dog's bollox.

Tiger broke a few third party hack-type apps that mess with the UI, along with some kernel extensions (notably MS Virtual PC network switch) but, apart from the now-patched Dashboard exploit, has been not only stable but much faster on all of my Macs (5, from old stuff to brand new stuff).

They're still selling Powerbooks FFS, even though the Intel CPU replacement plan should have killed the market instantly. Looks like geeks aren't the main market and people still pay for a fully integrated design.

Yeah OS X is (IMO) very cool, but the extreme Linux fanboys and some MSers can point out big flaws in it. However, even with these flaws, people are still buying hardware that *massively* underperforms compared to similarly priced PC kit (apart from top-spec dual G5s)...

If the 'slow as ' Macs are still selling, then when they're using the same CPUs as Alienware et al, surely it's only going to get better? (unless they up the machines of course).

I just want 6 hours battery life and a top-speed P-M in my 12" Powerbook. That is all :dream-on:


There are some good points in there.

Mac's will continue to sell because if you ask a large proportion of the buyers about the chip swap you will get a blank look as they have no idea wtf you are talking about.

I know plenty of people who have boughts mac's on there looks alone.

At work we use different model Mac's. I'm a neutral as I realize that all of OS's have Pros and cons.

Why are you slating Mac's for been slow anyway?.

I think Apple has lost its way recently as Mac's don't offer any major advantage over PC's except they don't catch all of the Spyware/virus/trojan's I suppose.

One thing is for sure it will be interesting to watch the events over the next year or two.

cyberface

12,214 posts

286 months

Wednesday 17th August 2005
quotequote all
__Lee__ said:
Why are you slating Mac's for been slow anyway?.

I think Apple has lost its way recently as Mac's don't offer any major advantage over PC's except they don't catch all of the Spyware/virus/trojan's I suppose.

Don't want to get into yet another OS argument, but I think what you've just posted is the biggest deal for Mr Average user without a reasonable amount of IT knowledge.

I use Macs, Linux boxes and Windows boxes. The Windows box takes more maintenance (patching) than the rest put together. I'm not anti-MS but it's easy for an ex-techie like me to understand the need to patch OS vulnerabilities and to block unused ports, etc.

For a home user without this tech knowledge, an unpatched Windows box on broadband quickly becomes a zombie or part of a botnet. I had the misfortune of installing W2k on a neighbour's PC a while back, and within 3 seconds of connecting to the internet on BT home broadband (to download patches) the machine was owned by automated hackers.

Current Mac systems avoid this, and given that Norton Internet Security Suite (essential for most MS boxes) costs £50, the Apple premium is worth it for many non-techies.

As to the speed thing... well I bought the dual 2.5 GHz G5 Mac as soon as it was announced. It's fast... and I love Macs... but stick a couple of Opterons under those monster water-cooled heatsinks in my G5 Powermac and I'll bet they're faster

(oh yeah, right now, as I post this, both CPUs are running at 85˚C and the memory controller is at 100.5˚C - these boxes are bouncing off the rev limiter )

munky

5,328 posts

277 months

Thursday 18th August 2005
quotequote all
My Apple shares are up 19% in under 2 months so they're doing something right.

Now, will you all please go and buy iPods and iMacs. Thanks

tycho

12,276 posts

302 months

Thursday 18th August 2005
quotequote all
parrot of doom said:
As someone who thinks the whole iPod music thing is a gigantic ripoff, I laughed at this.

Serves them right for ripping the consumer off.


Exactly how are they ripping the customer off?

scorp

8,783 posts

258 months

Thursday 18th August 2005
quotequote all
scared but happy said:

scorp said:
WMA isnt a MP3 rip-off.


Sorry what I ment was a re-invent the wheel time. Due to licensing restrictions?


MP3 isnt entirely perfect a lot of the newer formats surpass it in both compression strength and audio quality (OGG, WMA, AAC, AC3, etc), and yes there are patent restrictions. I don't think its re-inventing the wheel as the newer formats are technically better, its more progression of technology. Confusing for us consumers though