16 inch front wheels - pros and cons?
16 inch front wheels - pros and cons?
Author
Discussion

sawman

Original Poster:

5,063 posts

246 months

Thursday 8th December 2022
quotequote all
currently have the standard 15 /16 imolas on my 400 (has power steering) . In terms of wider choice for tyres, I am wondering about picking up some 16s for the front, obviously this also opens up the possibility of a brake upgrade. Are there any particular downsides? optimum tyre width / profile?

Cheers in advance

Unweder

19,218 posts

237 months

Friday 9th December 2022
quotequote all
Yes if you dont have steering rack lock limiter bushes full lock may mean the wheels rub on the suspension lower wishbone they are 1/2" wider than 15's wink however please note May

sixor8

7,063 posts

284 months

Friday 9th December 2022
quotequote all
As well as being 1/2" wider the 16" wheels from the rears have a higher offset (ET33) whilst the original 15" fronts are ET25. The inside edge of the wheel therefore sits further into the wheelarch and you'd likely need spacers to avoid said catching. Presumably TVR did this for the last few models?

Many people have done this and therefore, there are plenty of second hand 15" front wheels about, but very few 16". frown You'd probably be better off getting hold of a set of 4 x 16" (or even 17") Ford wheels (or other 4 x 108 donor wheels) for the price of 2 x 16" Imolas. scratchchin

Belle427

10,785 posts

249 months

Friday 9th December 2022
quotequote all
They do pop up for sale now and again.
No major cons really, my car didn't foul with them luckily.
The car was designed to have a nose down stance from the factory so this may be the only minor con, although this is probably nothing.
I think they do look better with 16s all round.

indigochim

1,973 posts

146 months

Monday 12th December 2022
quotequote all
sawman said:
also opens up the possibility of a brake upgrade.
You can get brake upgrades to fit under 15" rims I fitted 4 pot callipers to the front and they'll still allow for 15's it depends on how large a disc you want to fit.

sawman said:
Are there any particular downsides? optimum tyre width / profile?
As others have stated they may rub and you'll probably need to run a spacer. I don't think 8mm are available but I found 5mm to be sufficient if you do fit spacers apparently you want hub centric ones rather than the flat plates.

Belle427 said:
The car was designed to have a nose down stance from the factory so this may be the only minor con, although this is probably nothing.
I think they do look better with 16s all round.
You can avoid any noticeable change in stance by ensuring the diameter of your wheel/tyre combo is close to the original I used this site to check.

These are the sizes I went from - to.




As you can see they only raise the car 2.45mm which is less than the difference between a new and worn tyre.

edit to add the above image is without spacers. You can see the 16" rim sits further towards the suspension. Below is with a 5mm spacer which would effectively change the offset of a rear from 33mm to 28mm the fronts are 25mm



Edited by indigochim on Monday 12th December 17:13