RE: 2023 BMW M135i xDrive | PH Review
RE: 2023 BMW M135i xDrive | PH Review
Saturday 10th December 2022

2023 BMW M135i xDrive | PH Review

Do the mechanical revisions to the BMW M135i xDrive make a silk purse out of a sow's ear?


If ever a hot hatch needed some revisions, it was the BMW M135i xDrive. When the F40 usurped the rear-drive F20, it had a point to prove: that the move to a transverse four-pot and all-wheel drive was actually progress. It didn’t. It felt like a car designed by committee, then handed to a bunch of engineers to make the best of it. The concept felt contrived and the execution half-baked. As a pokey hatchback, you could argue it was broadly acceptable, but as a hot hatch it was a dullard. Sorry BMW, but it’s true.

And BMW knew it was, because it’s now been revised and claims to add all the added drama the old one was missing. The front wheels have more camber, there are new hydromounts for the front wishbones, which sounds like something for the updated Grease film, and there are redesigned mounts for the rear trailing and control arms. The spring and damper rates have been tweaked, too, which is all about reducing roll and improving steering feel - i.e. making the M135i finally come alive.

I see the committee has been reconvened, though. There’s a line in the press pack that says, ‘the retuned drive soundtrack in the cabin makes the driving experience even more emotionally engaging'. When phrases like ‘emotionally engaging’ are used, almost always the results are anything but.

And so it proves. The latest M135i is certainly quick enough, but out-and-out performance never was its problem. The little 2.0-litre turbo delivers some pep, let me tell you, thanks to 306hp, and with 332lb available between 1,800 and 4,500rpm, it’s jolly flexible as well. The problem is that the engine – despite claims that its emotional circuitry has been switch on at last – is still dull. BMW’s fours don’t sound very nice full stop. That’s an inherent issue, and painting over the cracks with some extra parp isn't going to solve it. I’m not saying it's horribly harsh, or anything of the sort, but it’s not a sweet-sounding and inspiring motor. And when you turn on even more synthesised 'emotions' with the Sport mode, which does the X-Box speaker thing and pops a bit, it still fails to impress.

Then there’s the gearbox. The eight-speed auto. It’s okay in manual mode, when the changes mostly come when you want them. It's also good enough in auto mode when you are driving in an everyday fashion. It's not brilliant, though. It fumbles for, say, third, if it’s been loafing in eighth on a light throttle and you suddenly hit the kickdown switch - but that's not what irks me. No, it's the way it behaves off the line and in slow-moving traffic that does it. It's quite jerky when you take up drive and, if you have to stop again, the grabby brakes are equally as bad, as is the clunky stop-start of the engine. The combination makes your passengers think there’s a lead-footed nincompoop behind the wheel.

But at least the steering will be brilliant, post the changes, right? Wrong. The steering has zero feel. On a slippery, cold day in the countryside, you make the sign of the cross before every bend, because there’s nothing tangible to rely on when it comes to sensing the grip. Even the on-centre feel is poor. When you’re ambling along a motorway it’s very easy to meander offline if you’re changing a setting in the cabin.

At least changing the settings is easy to do, because the 1 Series comes with lots of simple buttons that cover all the basics – temperature, heated rear window, power-folding mirrors and the like – and an iDrive controller is on-hand if you need to dive headlong into the infotainment menus. And because this is BMW’s older-generation iDrive, those menus are broadly simple to trawl through. So I'm not blind to the positives, which happen to include the interior fixtures and fittings. They’re not top-class, but they’re top-end for this class, with decent materials applied solidly. Overall, it's much nicer inside than a Mk8 Golf. 

Anyway, back to the driving. Another thing about the steering is the torque steer. This was a big issue with the previous model, so some of the changes were aimed at reducing it. It’s better, but the problem hasn't vanished entirely. The cold and slippery conditions probably didn’t help, but getting on the power when the front wheels have a grip differential still results in the M135i tugging left or right – and there's some camber sensitivity in there, too. The traction otherwise is good and so is the overall grip. It carries plenty of mid-corner speed, there's very little roll, and it can blast out of a turn with some conviction and even a little line-tightening rotation. That's a combination of the mechanical front diff and activated rear axle doing their bit to quell the understeer. It won’t go sideways, but that’s fine; hot hatches don’t need to in my book. They just need to tuck in tidily and the M135i does.

The standard car comes with passive M Sport suspension, but the car we were given came with adaptive dampers – a £500 option. I hate to think what the standard car rides like. There’s this perception that a sporty car has to be firm. It doesn’t. The very best sports cars ride sublimely – even the most outlandish ones, like the Lamborghini Aventador. That’s all very well, you might say, because that’s a very expensive car. Lower down the price ladder, with less high-end hardware to pick from, achieving compliance and control is a harder task. That’s not true, though, is it. The FK8 Honda Civic Type R is proof of that. That was a car so capable in terms of wheel control that it would demolish anything along a back road. Yet it was also extremely comfortable the rest of the time.

In contrast, the M135i isn’t particularly comfortable even in its Comfort mode. It’s not the worst hot hatch I’ve tried, true, and it doesn’t thump or jar horribly over bumps - but it never settles over the little imperfections. It's busy and reactive, and the consistent fidgeting becomes annoying because it doesn't calm down fully even at motorway speeds. The rolling refinement is good, though. The Michelin Pilot Sport 4s will kick up when interacting with a really coarse surface, but generally road noise is subdued and wind noise is soft and consistent at 70mph. The only thing that hurts its long-distance credentials is the front seats, which feel flat under the thighs and seem to perch you on top of them, rather than semi-submerge you within their bolsters.

Once again, then, I feel like the M135i would be fine if it were badged up as an everyday 128i, had softer suspension and a better gearbox. Then it would be a quick and worthy hatchback. But describing it as a hot hatch demands a bit more, and in that regard, the M135i fails to deliver. It’s a real shame that the latest Type R has become so expensive, because that stops it being the default it once was. Even so, its value for money as a proper hot hatch is still readily apparent next to the M135i. I wonder whether or not the fact that BMW has undercut the Golf R by a couple of grand speaks volumes about its expectations. Because if you're after an everyday fast car that's also fun, for me, the R wipes the floor with the M135i.

What if you can't deal with the Golf's iffy interior and infotainment, though? Is there a BMW that's fast and fun and easy to live with in equal measures? Yes, the 220i Coupe or, better still, the M240i xDrive. I know there's £7,000 between the M240i and the M135i but, if you can afford that, the extra is well worth it. The M240i is silky in almost every respect. The M135i, however, isn’t. It's still a bit of a sow's ear. 


Specification | 2023 BMW M135i xDrive

Engine: 1,998cc, four-cylinder, turbocharged
Transmission: eight-speed auto, four-wheel drive
Power (hp): 305 @ 5,000-6,250rpm
Torque (lb ft): 332 @ 1,800-4,500rpm
0-62mph: 4.8 seconds
Top speed: 155mph
Weight: 1,600kg (EU)
MPG: 38.2 (WLTP)
CO2: 168g/km (WLTP)
Price: £41,095

Author
Discussion

GreatScott2016

2,522 posts

118 months

Sunday 11th December 2022
quotequote all
Not much to get excited about then. Shame really as I was hoping that BMW would have "fixed" some of these issues but apparently not. I know we live in strange times, but i can't help thinking that it's still overpriced!

The Specials

107 posts

163 months

Sunday 11th December 2022
quotequote all
As an owner of a Mar 21 version the ride is too firm and gearbox is not great, at times. However, it is fast and the handling good enough for most normal drivers on UK and German roads. Living in Bavaria this bangs along the autobahn faster than most and the brakes work very well in a emergency stop, on winter Bridgestone tyres, 10c, dry, at 220kph when avoiding a lorry whose driver was on his mobile! Finally, it has buttons, the id drive controller, heated steering wheel (essential here and not available on S3) and a power tailgate (essential for my partner). Gearbox and ride aside I have only very good comments.

menousername

2,501 posts

172 months

Sunday 11th December 2022
quotequote all
Is it not possible for a manufacturer to achieve mpg and emissions though various means sufficient to allow them to use old school hydraulic steering? Or is it so heavy it simply is not viable anymore?

Could they not have done everything else like the 4-pot and some weight-saving but given it cracking steering?


roadie

880 posts

292 months

Sunday 11th December 2022
quotequote all
There's nothing wrong with electric steering. It seems this implementation is just not very good!

I probably preferred the electric steering in my 130i to the hydraulic in my current 335i.

I've been impressed riding in a 118i version of this car. It is a shame this range ripping version does not appear to hit the mark and the best is the 128i. No manual is a massive issue to me though!

BlindedByTheLights

2,000 posts

127 months

Sunday 11th December 2022
quotequote all
I had a 118i recently on hire, lovely inside but I found it awful to drive. Tram lined all over the place and pulling constantly, wandering on the motorway and torque steer even under moderate acceleration.

anonymous-user

84 months

Sunday 11th December 2022
quotequote all
I can get past the fat dumpy looks, its a no from me.

Dombilano

1,446 posts

85 months

Sunday 11th December 2022
quotequote all
Having owned the F40 m135i directly after a m140i, the main issues were blindingly obvious. It needed another 50bhp, and about 100kg + less weight.
Was it a bad car, no. It cornered far better than the m140i, nicer seats too. But it was 100% not better than the car it replaced.
So much so, that via an RS4, I got another m140i within a year.

nismo48

7,068 posts

237 months

Sunday 11th December 2022
quotequote all
LBW2020 said:
I can get past the fat dumpy looks, its a no from me.
scratchchin

cerb4.5lee

44,697 posts

210 months

Sunday 11th December 2022
quotequote all
I really like the style of the wheel, and I'd love a set of those in silver on the M4.

Having read the review, I think that I'd go in the direction of the M240i xDrive too.

johno333

95 posts

179 months

Sunday 11th December 2022
quotequote all
Swapped a MK7 Gti for a MY 2019 at the start of the panpanic. 55k miles later I still miss the Gti. The bmw does everything you want an all weather high mileage commuter to do. Get a mountain bike in the back, family holidays, traffic light drag races etc. But it’s not a car to have fun in. Was aiming to go back to VW, R or GTi, but VW seemed to have discovered a grade of plastic for their interiors that is so bad and low quality that a Lada Riva seems plush.

aestivator

265 posts

60 months

Sunday 11th December 2022
quotequote all
Well at least it's drop dead gorgeous... oh.

Loplop

2,012 posts

215 months

Sunday 11th December 2022
quotequote all
SWMBO is on her second JCW and the engine and gearbox let the rest of the car down massively.

How the B58 is as good as it is and B48 as bad as it is when the latter is the former just with two cylinders lopped off I'll never know and how Aisin is getting away with such a sub-par FWD 8 speed being used by so many I'll never know.

RonnieHotdogs

1,066 posts

131 months

Sunday 11th December 2022
quotequote all
Loplop said:
... how Aisin is getting away with such a sub-par FWD 8 speed being used by so many I'll never know.
My only guess is some sort of "tech swap" between BMW and Toyota / Aisin.

Had one of these back in 2020 and I got rid of it after about 6 months for an m340i.

As a car, as everyone else says, it was great. Well built, roomy, good tech etc. For driving though, I felt it was incredibly dull.

Never really felt that fast either to be honest. Leaving it in gear and letting it kick down on the motorway it felt like it had about 150bhp. Had a few cars unexpectedly walk away from it.

MissChief

7,989 posts

198 months

Sunday 11th December 2022
quotequote all
Loplop said:
SWMBO is on her second JCW and the engine and gearbox let the rest of the car down massively.

How the B58 is as good as it is and B48 as bad as it is when the latter is the former just with two cylinders lopped off I'll never know and how Aisin is getting away with such a sub-par FWD 8 speed being used by so many I'll never know.
This is the main issue. My 2015 428i had the frankly excellent ZF 8 speed which I cannot fault in any way. Well, if I'm being pedantic the brakes are a little bit grabby when coming to a stop but that's a very minor issue. I can only assume Aisin are far cheaper than ZF otherwise I don't see the point in making the change, everyone I know with an automatic 1 series says the gearbox is terrible.

Loplop

2,012 posts

215 months

Sunday 11th December 2022
quotequote all
RonnieHotdogs said:
Never really felt that fast either to be honest. Leaving it in gear and letting it kick down on the motorway it felt like it had about 150bhp. Had a few cars unexpectedly walk away from it.
Whilst I get that the JCW hatch has the 230bhp version of the B48 and not this full fat 300+bhp one, I have to say, her JCW just isn't as quick as my E350 CDI Estate.

The gearbox changes fast at full chat in sport mode, but the car just feels like it runs out of puff after 5k, but it's near enough completely flat before 2.5k, a surprisingly narrow powerband for a modern car.

It's also not particularly good on fuel, her previous 308 GTi was much better in every respect despite being a bigger car.

StRemy

401 posts

62 months

Sunday 11th December 2022
quotequote all
menousername said:
Is it not possible for a manufacturer to achieve mpg and emissions though various means sufficient to allow them to use old school hydraulic steering? Or is it so heavy it simply is not viable anymore?

Could they not have done everything else like the 4-pot and some weight-saving but given it cracking steering?
It’s probably the only way to implement the several driving assistance systems required these days.

Cobracc

3,520 posts

180 months

Sunday 11th December 2022
quotequote all
Ghastly!

Firebobby

994 posts

69 months

Sunday 11th December 2022
quotequote all
I don't think I've read a decent report on these. IIRC the ZF couldn't be turned around and that's why they went for the Aisin, probably cheaper too! When the time comes I won't be swapping the M135i for one of these, I'll either go EV, or go over to the dark side and get a Golf R.

Iamnotkloot

1,907 posts

177 months

Sunday 11th December 2022
quotequote all
I like it when a car drives like it looks

Donovfarm

38 posts

70 months

Sunday 11th December 2022
quotequote all
This write up is both irritating and pleasing at the same time. So the M135i was always a sows ear was it? I don’t recall reading that anywhere when it was launched. It seems that it is only when a new model is launched do we learn the foibles and demerits of the previous version and there are times when I really miss the moments when car journos had fangs and actually stood up to say a car was rubbish. Now advertising revenues seem to have taken precedence. I am genuinely pleased and uplifted to see that this crap car is revealed to be what it was and what it still is. BMW should be ashamed of being so lazy. Journos need to start to speak as they find and the author of this piece is to be (app)lauded.