Smoke ban 'will widen health gap'
Smoke ban 'will widen health gap'
Author
Discussion

Witchfinder

Original Poster:

6,388 posts

281 months

Friday 19th August 2005
quotequote all
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4162352.stm

Now is it just me, or is this totally the wrong way of looking at things? Rather than saying "It'll improve health for lots of people", they're moaning that it won't improve the health of poor people. What is this obsession with "social justice" and equality all about?

JagLover

46,765 posts

264 months

Friday 19th August 2005
quotequote all
It is on a BBC website, what do you expect.

The BBC would quite cheerfully impose health equality by shooting the elderly middle class (with exceptions for their left wing buddies of course)

minimax

11,985 posts

285 months

Friday 19th August 2005
quotequote all
and why is it that people seem to accept in these reports/studies that it's somehow ok for poor people to smoke, as if they haven't any other pleasures?

I recall john reid getting in to hot water for saying that we can't expect poor people to stop smoking as it's one of the only pleasures they can afford...well excuse me but at £5.34 for a pack of cancer sticks if they can afford 20 a day they're either on the dodge or not poor.

why the distinction? why is it that the labour govt think that if you have no money normal rules do not apply?

"robbed an old lady and beat sh1t out of her did you? and you come from a disadvantaged council estate I hear? oh you poor misunderstood girl/boy, have a rehabilitation order"

or

"daddy not give you enough money to stop you robbing old ladies eh? you rich bastard, off to clink for 5 years"

or something along those lines...perhaps...

so why not equality across the board?

It's just like that quote, some people are just more equal than others....


/

tinman0

18,231 posts

269 months

Friday 19th August 2005
quotequote all
The bbc news website is doing its best at social engineering at the moment.

Its been in full meddle mode for the last 2 weeks. I think they employed a new woman editor.




ducks for cover....

>> Edited by tinman0 on Friday 19th August 10:29

Don

28,378 posts

313 months

Friday 19th August 2005
quotequote all
JagLover said:
The BBC would quite cheerfully impose health equality by shooting the elderly middle class (with exceptions for their left wing buddies of course)


Slightly unfair but I know what you mean. Same mentality as wanting to cancel guided walks in the Lake District because only middle-aged, middle-class white people were going on them...

simpo two

92,772 posts

294 months

Friday 19th August 2005
quotequote all
Reminds me of Ricky Gervais as a policeman doing the racism test last night. Very clever.

cotty

42,237 posts

313 months

Friday 19th August 2005
quotequote all
They say current proposals for a ban in England in 2008 would mean those in poorer areas would struggle to find a smoke-free pub

They can do what smokers do when they go to a non smoking pub, ie stand outside

Problem solved, next

MILF

1,209 posts

274 months

Friday 19th August 2005
quotequote all
You mean the poor can afford to drink & smoke !!

Seriously though am struggling to envisage how people can be described as "poor" when they have suffiecent disposable income to spend £5 a day on cancer sticks & spend their time/money ambling to various drinking establishments.

Perhaps one way to kill 2 birds with one stone is to lower the benefits paid to these poor people in the first place, so that not only can they no longer afford to deliberatly poison themselves with tabs, but in addition they wont have to endure the secondary effects of smoking from the affluent people who can afford to congregate in such drinking establishments.

In facts its 3 birds that are now deceased, since it would also reduce the amount of Tax that Mr Brown just loves plundering from my monthly salary.

RESULT !!