RE: Mercedes CLK 55 AMG | Spotted
RE: Mercedes CLK 55 AMG | Spotted
Wednesday 8th February 2023

Mercedes CLK 55 AMG | Spotted

Brawny engine twinned with classy looks; if only our German friends could return to type...


I’m always intrigued by stereotypes. Take the Germans. Now, I’m very fond of the Germans. I spend a lot of time in das Varterland and I like the way its people go about things. And contrary to popular belief, most of the ones I’ve met ­– and I’ve even dated a couple – don’t meet the dour stereotype at all. Generally speaking, I find our Teutonic brethren jolly funny and highly engaging company. Yet when it comes to cars, national stereotypes do tend to work.

Think about it. Italy makes things that are beautiful but fragile, France does the quirky but sometimes maddening, and Germany prides itself in providing an oasis of calm dependability. Its cars aren’t over-styled; they’re simple and elegant, and they don’t break down. Or at least that used to be the case.

These days of course, most German car makers are acting a bit like those corporate entities that insist their staff have ‘fun’. What they end up enacting is a kind of forced fun, which isn’t fun at all. Looking at some of the latest car designs from the big-hitting Germans, they seem so over the top I find myself wondering whether the top-down edict of ‘make it exciting’ has been derived from an algorithm, rather than the free-thinking, creative mind of a human being.

This came to my mind the other day when I parked next to a W208 CLK. Now, I realise this was not a point in Mercedes’ history when its cars were built like the doors of a nuclear bunker, but I was struck by its pure and flowing form. It is elegant. That’s why I started searching around the classifieds for one, and I found this, a CLK 55. And even though this was the Brutus of the range, with a thumping 5.4-litre V8 wedged in its nose, it hasn’t been ruined by someone’s uninformed notion of what a performance car should look like.

There’s nothing too outlandish about this 55. The only things that separate it from the lesser CLKs are a pair of barely brawny bumpers, extended side skirts, a set of rather attractive five-spoke AMG alloys and two oval tailpipes sticking out the back. I suppose if you want to be picky about it, those side skirts, with the odd twist two-thirds the way along, look a bit Ripspeed, but they hardly constitute gauche. Not when the forthcoming M2 leaves you feeling sorry for those dubious tuners, which have nowhere to go in screwing up a design because BMW has done the job in-house.

I also like this CLK because it has the air of relative simplicity about it. The naturally aspirated M113 V8 is complemented and generally able to shrug off big miles as long as it’s well serviced, and there’s no air suspension, no electronic diffs or other complexities of the modern age. That means it shouldn't drive a fat wedge between you and your bank manager as you ask him or her for a, well, fat wedge to keep the thing going.

I’m not saying you should buy blind and all will be fine. As I’ve said, this era of Mercedes’ products can be sketchy, with electrics and gearboxes a known weakness. And of course, the panels perforate to form little brown doilies out of otherwise solid structures - but this one looks okay on that front. There’s some bubbling around the arches to be aware of, but as long as the tin worm’s not travelled too far behind that it should be salvageable – and there’s nothing in the MOT history to suggest it has. While it’s at the bodyshop, get the wheel rims refinished and you’ll have a very tidy-looking 54,000-miler for under ten grand.

That’s not a lot of money for a 350hp AMG coupe, is it? One that’ll bat off 0-62mph in 5.4 seconds, with a soundtrack to shake the putty loose in a few windows as it thunders by. There’s also something very charming about this era of AMG. Sure, it’s not a car that’ll clip every apex with precision, but it’s not a track car. It’s a road car, and the well-known unstickability of its rear tyres is what makes it fun. And not fun in inverted commas; the proper kind, spelt FUN for good measure.


Specification | Mercedes CLK 55 AMG (W208)

Engine: 5,439cc, V8, naturally aspirated
Transmission: five-speed automatic, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 347 @ 5,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 376 @ 3,000rpm
CO2: 281g/km (NEDC)
MPG: 23.9 (NEDC)
Recorded mileage: 54,000
Year registered: 2000
Price new: N/A
Yours for: £7,450

See the original advert here

Author
Discussion

Water Fairy

Original Poster:

6,636 posts

185 months

Wednesday 8th February 2023
quotequote all
Got to be worth a punt at that price. Excellent spotted.

Mark-C

7,690 posts

235 months

Wednesday 8th February 2023
quotequote all
Seems a reasonable price in the current market for a v8 bruiser ... won't be everyones cup of tea but that's OK too!

pb8g09

3,262 posts

99 months

Wednesday 8th February 2023
quotequote all
It’s a good spot in this market, but I have to admit I really dislike the interior. I’ve heard a few of these with some after market things done to the exhausts and they sound rather exciting.

KillerHERTZ

1,119 posts

228 months

Wednesday 8th February 2023
quotequote all
The main issue with these is the rust. These and the W210 E-Class models were worst during the dark times of MB Paint/Galvanisation issues.

Every single panel can and will rust on these, especally sliver ones.

Turbobanana

8,493 posts

231 months

Wednesday 8th February 2023
quotequote all
Keep it standard but put a CLK 200 badge on the back.

pb8g09

3,262 posts

99 months

Wednesday 8th February 2023
quotequote all
Turbobanana said:
Keep it standard but put a CLK 200 badge on the back.
Why?

Retro.74

325 posts

53 months

Wednesday 8th February 2023
quotequote all
If ever there was a car to define a street sleeper. Looks like someone put an AMG badge on for a bit of a laugh. None of the usual AMG styling cues like the 4 tailpipes, 5.5 V8 badge down the side etc. I guess the noise may point to something a bit lairy.

Seems good value in todays market esp at that mileage and seems well maintained. Can't imagine the running costs are great but what you'd expect when buying an old Merc.

trevalvole

2,079 posts

63 months

Wednesday 8th February 2023
quotequote all
Retro.74 said:
If ever there was a car to define a street sleeper. Looks like someone put an AMG badge on for a bit of a laugh. None of the usual AMG styling cues like the 4 tailpipes, 5.5 V8 badge down the side etc.
It does have the twisted side skirts. I don't think AMGs of this generation (e.g. W210) had engine size badges on their wings.

J4CKO

46,970 posts

230 months

Wednesday 8th February 2023
quotequote all
I like that, the problem with these old CLKs of this shape is they are prime targets for some less than tasteful modifications, i.e. festooned in chrome st, black wheels and all sorts of horrors, but this just looks very tidy and original. I think these have perhaps started moving from cheap old Merc into classic-ish.

Its about as cheap as you will get for an actual AMG Mercedes, assuming its as god as it looks, in todays market it seems really good value. Wont be the sportiest drive but I bet its really nice, still pretty quick at 5 ish to sixty and 11 and a bit to 100, 13.3 quarter mile, not massively quick in todays performance realm but not too shabby.


Hatchoo

218 posts

233 months

Wednesday 8th February 2023
quotequote all
Blimey, it had done 50k miles by 2010. Looks like the yearly itinerary was one trip to the garage and one trip to see the grand kids. If it's had a quiet garage-based life then it might be the one that isn't rusty...

cerb4.5lee

44,965 posts

210 months

Wednesday 8th February 2023
quotequote all
I'm finding myself more and more attracted to these old V8 Mercs currently. So much car for such relatively little money I reckon. I enjoyed reading the write up too.

Bencolem

1,188 posts

269 months

Wednesday 8th February 2023
quotequote all
There’s a reason these are “seemingly good value”. They rust and you better not pressure wash one as it will bring the lacquer off the paint (ask me how I know!). Such a shame Mercedes botched the quality of this era because it’s elegant, mechanically robust and has a fun, honest drive to it.

Turbobanana

8,493 posts

231 months

Wednesday 8th February 2023
quotequote all
pb8g09 said:
Turbobanana said:
Keep it standard but put a CLK 200 badge on the back.
Why?
Same reason everybody only ever buys fast cars in dull colours: stealf, innit?

JJJ.

5,628 posts

45 months

Wednesday 8th February 2023
quotequote all
Rust would be my only real concern. Electrics and g/box are not really issues and usually inexpensive to fix in the grand scheme of things.

In this day and age it looks good value if the mileage and history are correct.

Dombilano

1,459 posts

85 months

Wednesday 8th February 2023
quotequote all
Nearly got a clk 430 a decade ago, probably turned to rust by now. This clk55 looks worth saving, especially at that price

Slowlygettingit

946 posts

71 months

Wednesday 8th February 2023
quotequote all
Not a fan of this shape but I do keep looking at the following generation (not sure of the model number) the guy who used to live opposite me had one and always lied the thought of one as an occasional cobweb blower.

daveco

4,413 posts

237 months

Wednesday 8th February 2023
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
I like that, the problem with these old CLKs of this shape is they are prime targets for some less than tasteful modifications, i.e. festooned in chrome st, black wheels and all sorts of horrors, but this just looks very tidy and original. I think these have perhaps started moving from cheap old Merc into classic-ish.

Its about as cheap as you will get for an actual AMG Mercedes, assuming its as god as it looks, in todays market it seems really good value. Wont be the sportiest drive but I bet its really nice, still pretty quick at 5 ish to sixty and 11 and a bit to 100, 13.3 quarter mile, not massively quick in todays performance realm but not too shabby.
It was also fairly quick on track as well despite the auto 'box. 1 min 18 sec around Hockenheim Short track if I remember correctly.

Steveh007

1 posts

44 months

Wednesday 8th February 2023
quotequote all
I have to mention that the Mercedes CLK 55 is a hidden gem. I own a basic 200 Kompresser CLK LHD Black with tan leather interior. AMG alloys. Electric sun roof, Electric and heated seats with memory, parking sensors, rain sensors and total annalog! First owner imported it from Italy to Spain in 2012. And sold it to me 2021! I bought it as the condition is A1. 51000 miles ( 90500 km) Zero rust. Excellent paint and interior. Mercedes history. Its an amazing car for the condition. And the engineered quality is there. Im sure it will still be driving around for another 22 years.

nismo48

7,160 posts

237 months

Wednesday 8th February 2023
quotequote all
Mark-C said:
Seems a reasonable price in the current market for a v8 bruiser ... won't be everyones cup of tea but that's OK too!
Agree a good barge wink

GTRene

22,656 posts

254 months

Wednesday 8th February 2023
quotequote all
pricewise good and it seems to be aa very reliable engine the M113, same as in the SLK55 I believe.

personally I rather would have a SLK55 with such engine, more compact, better looking (I think) and the option to lower the roof.
no idea how much those are in the UK, although a while ago I saw some for around that 10k money in good state low mileage, but that was 2 years or so ago, no idea how prices are now.

great engine though, torque and so on, not more needed those days on busy streets, although welcome just to have more... kleemann kit and so on.