RE: BMW Z3 M Roadster | Spotted
RE: BMW Z3 M Roadster | Spotted
Monday 13th February 2023

BMW Z3 M Roadster | Spotted

Not the most powerful Z3 ever, but a stunning car nonetheless


It’s the mid ‘90s. BMW is at the beginning of a purple patch that, arguably, produced a model line-up that it's never eclipsed. I for one wouldn’t challenge that. The classy E38 7 Series arrived in 1994, followed a year later by one of the best cars ever built, in terms of the completeness of its package, the E39 5 Series. And that was followed soon after by the E46 3 Series, which was as good to drive as it was pretty.

With the core of its models looking strong to the point of unbeatable, and feeling cash rich and potent, BMW decided to keep pressing on with new and exciting cars to enhance its brand’s reach. It had dabbled in the two-seater drop-top market in the late ‘80s with the Z1, but that was a quirky car with plastic panels and drop-down doors. It lasted just two years and BMW only sold 8,000 of them, but someone within the heart of the Munich machine obviously saw an opportunity left untapped in the sports car arena. It had to get it right this time, though, and appeal to more than just a few. It needed to tap into a zeitgeist, so it did. And the zeitgeist was retro styling.

The Dodge Viper was an early adopter, and by the end of the decade through to the beginning of the next, retro-looking cars were to become commonplace. The Audi TT, Ford Thunderbird, Chevy SSR, Jaguar S-Type and Rover 75 were just a few of the cars that took their inspiration from the past. Oh, and yes, I deliberately left out the PT Cruiser just in case you’re eating. But BMW was one of the very first mainstream car makers to see which way the wind was blowing, and with it came the scent of yesteryear.

The BMW Z3 was launched in 1995, and while not everyone appreciated its misty-eyed modernity, enough people were wowed by this period of the automotive renaissance that the order books were filled for two years. The excitement was palpable. I mean, what could possibly go wrong? You had a car company at the top of its game, styling that was bang on point, and the world had fallen in love with two-seater sports cars all over again. There was even a touch of glamour. The Z8 Roadster was waiting in the wings, which was to be something exclusive, and the Z3 offered a slice of that ‘50s nostalgia for a fraction of the price. On top of that, both cars were driven by James Bond, and that’s always a shot in the arm.

BMW did get it wrong, though. The Z3 wasn’t based on the full E36 3 Series platform, which was current at the time; it was based on the shorter wheelbase BMW Compact. That meant the rear suspension borrowed heavily from the E30, which is said to have been used because it took up less space than the E36’s more complex multi-link Z-axle, allowing for a flatter boot floor. Hampered by old tech, it couldn’t compete with the Porsche Boxster around corners, and that wasn’t the end of its issues. The puny eight-valve 1.9-litre four-cylinder was another. It was the only engine available at launch and offered just 120hp, which meant 0-62mph in, wait for it… 10.1 seconds. Oh gawd blimey, it was yawn inducing.

Realising it needed to act, BMW introduced the 2.8-litre ‘six’ in 1997. With nearly 200hp, that was more inline with the Porsche Boxster both in terms of power and its 0-62mph of 6.7 seconds, but what ended up fulfilling the Z3's early promise was the car featured here: the wonderful Z3 M Roadster. You voted the Z3 M tenth on our list of All-time best M cars, and for good reason. It came with the E36 M3’s S50 3.2-litre six-cylinder with 321hp, along with the accompanying limited-slip differential and larger brakes. To differentiate the Z3 M further from its lesser brethren, it had M oval wing mirrors, more aggressive front and rear bumpers, a wider rear track and those broad Roadstar wheels, necessitating meatier arches to cover them. It was also the first M car to come with quad exhausts, which have since become a trademark feature of anything M. At last the Z3 had become a truly exciting prospect, although this wasn’t the most powerful model ever built. There was a skunk-works prototype fitted with an M73 V12, would you believe. It was finished in bright orange and reputedly had just one more horsepower than the Z3 M, but was rather nose heavy.

This example looks fantastic in Cosmos black with twin-tone red and black hide, and it looks as clean as it should for a relatively light 43,000 miles. It’s not the cheapest around, but at £22,000 it seems to me it still offers a lot for the money: huge performance, thrill-a-minute handling, a great noise and, of course, those 507-esque looks, which have aged so very well.


SPECIFICATION | BMW Z3 M ROADSTER

Engine: 3,201cc, inline six
Transmission: Five-speed manual, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 321 @ 7,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 258 @ 3,250rpm
MPG: 25mpg
CO2: 258g/km
First registered: 1998
Recorded mileage: 43,000
Price new: £40,570
Yours for: £22,995

See the original advert here

Author
Discussion

Motormouth88

Original Poster:

791 posts

90 months

Monday 13th February 2023
quotequote all
Rare as hens teeth especially in that condition, would be a sensible investment for somebody

S600BSB

8,492 posts

136 months

Monday 13th February 2023
quotequote all
Doesn't do it for me - never liked the styling. Rather have my choice of MX-5s for the money.

SteBrown91

3,155 posts

159 months

Monday 13th February 2023
quotequote all
Motormouth88 said:
Rare as hens teeth especially in that condition, would be a sensible investment for somebody
Theres a house I drive past on the way to work who has two! Both in slightly ropey condition and barely seem to move!

J4CKO

46,968 posts

230 months

Monday 13th February 2023
quotequote all
Seems almost reasonable by the standards of the day price wise.

One near where I live in green, lives on the road, been there pretty much as long as we have lived there, we moved here in 1998 so must have had it from new.

TREMAiNE

4,164 posts

179 months

Monday 13th February 2023
quotequote all
I'm not sure about these.
I've always felt that the side profile and rear end look pretty mega but never really liked the front - the front end seems like it should be on a much bigger car and the rear end on a smaller car etc.

The interior is also horrendous in this specific example.

Great engine to shoehorn in, though. I would love to give one a drive and certainly not that stupidly priced in the current market and likely to go up over time...

Numeric

1,499 posts

181 months

Monday 13th February 2023
quotequote all
I had one for a year and while I loved the looks and the retro vibe, somehow it was never a car I felt excited driving. For me it just felt sort of inert.

In light of the fact that depending on the version there are some costly issues that can arise and it was a car I was happy to get rid of.

I've had quite a few higher powered BMW over the years and have one now which I love, so I was surprised by how indifferent the Z3M made me feel.

anonymous-user

84 months

Monday 13th February 2023
quotequote all
Another of my 'one day' dream cars. Always remember Tiff putting one up against some sort of TVR and preferring the BMW. Would be a brilliant daily I reckon, and that doesn't seem expensive in today's climate, I'd assumed these would be 30k plus

anonymous-user

84 months

Monday 13th February 2023
quotequote all
That's a relative bargain by today's standards and should be a fairly safe place to put your money. The Z3 in general is starting to go up in value as tidy examples become rarer. Plus, I sold my 2.8 last year so they're guaranteed to be worth a fortune soon.

wpa1975

14,770 posts

144 months

Monday 13th February 2023
quotequote all
Motormouth88 said:
Rare as hens teeth especially in that condition, would be a sensible investment for somebody
Agreed, looks nice condition

numtumfutunch

5,174 posts

168 months

Monday 13th February 2023
quotequote all

Its awful in my opinion, however if it was the breadvan version then lets talk smile

shalmaneser

6,459 posts

225 months

Monday 13th February 2023
quotequote all
I love this.

I had an E36 M3 Evo followed by an E46 M3 and I preferred the S50 motor in the evo - throttle cable so you didn't get the annoying rev hang you get on fly-by-wire engines. Also sounded better without the (admittedly initially amusing) rasp of the S54. But I seem to be in a minority so what do I know!

Interior is a bit marmite but the rest is great.

la grange

45 posts

177 months

Monday 13th February 2023
quotequote all
I had the breadvan (coupe) approx 16 years ago, bought from Munich Legends. On country roads it was not good, somewhat dangerous, it never settled when pushed hard, skitted around and felt very inert as previous poster stated in fact minus roof would I imagine be even worse than coupe. The engine was amazing and I loved the looks. My back was also crippled by seat/seating position.
The car was designed for per perfect roads and autobahn's.
In fact the best drive I had prior to speed cameras was driving in the early hours from Limoges to Brussels between 90-130mph, for several hours, on returning found bird wedged in front grill , dead of course, and minor oil seepage from head gasket. Apart from that drive was happy to get rid

Dombilano

1,458 posts

85 months

Monday 13th February 2023
quotequote all
Curves always age better than slashes. Z4.

jamesbilluk

4,142 posts

213 months

Monday 13th February 2023
quotequote all
Always preferred these to the Z4M, I love the rear view from them, with the wide rear arches.

Watcher of the skies

1,356 posts

67 months

Monday 13th February 2023
quotequote all
Motormouth88 said:
Rare as hens teeth especially in that condition, would be a sensible investment for somebody
Just as well.
The gawky clownshoe - my eyes!

Gad-Westy

16,613 posts

243 months

Monday 13th February 2023
quotequote all
"At last the Z3 had become a truly exciting prospect, although this wasn’t the most powerful model ever built. There was a skunk-works prototype fitted with an M73 V12, would you believe. It was finished in bright orange and reputedly had just one more horsepower than the Z3 M, but was rather nose heavy."

Did the roadster also get the S54 like the Coupe? In which case, did that not end up being the most powerful derivative, if the V12 only had 1bhp more than the S50 in the car the article is about?

I like these though. Came quite close to buying an imola red one many years ago but went for an Elise instead. I think I thought of the Z3M as a bit of a german TVR. A bit uncouth and not necessarily scalpel sharp in the corners but a big engine in a small car recipe. Obviously the elise was the exact opposite and I have no regrets but do still really have a soft spot for these. Right now, I'm a bit obsessive about the Coupes. I think they still look good value and are pretty much unique.

ScoobyChris

2,307 posts

232 months

Monday 13th February 2023
quotequote all
la grange said:
I had the breadvan (coupe) approx 16 years ago, bought from Munich Legends. On country roads it was not good, somewhat dangerous, it never settled when pushed hard, skitted around and felt very inert as previous poster stated in fact minus roof would I imagine be even worse than coupe. The engine was amazing and I loved the looks. My back was also crippled by seat/seating position.
The car was designed for per perfect roads and autobahn's.
In fact the best drive I had prior to speed cameras was driving in the early hours from Limoges to Brussels between 90-130mph, for several hours, on returning found bird wedged in front grill , dead of course, and minor oil seepage from head gasket. Apart from that drive was happy to get rid
I've only been in the convertible version about 15 years ago when a friend who'd been lusting after one found one locally for less than 5k. Was in great condition and actually completely changed my perception of them. We spent a couple of hours hooning around the local B-roads and the car didn't seem troubled by anything, with lots of acceleration between the bends and very planted pushing it through and out of them.

Chris

Water Fairy

6,635 posts

185 months

Monday 13th February 2023
quotequote all
I like it but at this money personally I would be looking at a Z4M Coupe

Bencolem

1,187 posts

269 months

Monday 13th February 2023
quotequote all
2 words: scuttle shake.

The open top Z3's had the structural rigidity of a wet lettuce. I had a breadvan version and that was bloody hairy when pushing on so when coupled with a bodyshell that's flopping and twisting about, the convertible Z3M is borderline dangerous when trying to take advantage of that (admittedly brilliant) engine.

There's a reason these are basically half the price of the breadvan - and it's not just about rarity...

Bencolem

1,187 posts

269 months

Monday 13th February 2023
quotequote all
Also, didn't know that "It was also the first M car to come with quad exhausts", so fun fact, thanks for that John!